Skip to main content
Log in

Inclusion problems in trace monoids

  • Published:
Cybernetics and Systems Analysis Aims and scope

Abstract

Efficient pattern matching algorithms for traces and their dependence graphs are proposed. Pattern matching problems related to problems of recognizing frequent patterns in structured data and counting the number of trace object windows that include a pattern are considered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Y. Chi, H. Wang, P. S. Yu, and R. R. Muntz, “Catch the moment: Maintaining closed frequent itemsets over a date stream sliding window,” Knowledge and Inform. Systems, 10, No. 3, 265–294 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. H-F. Li, M-K. Shan, S-Y. Lee, “DSM-FI: An efficient algorithm for mining frequent itemsets in data streams,” Knowledge and Inform. Systems, 17, No. 1 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  3. C. Ba, M. H. Ferrari, and M. A. Musicante, “Composing Web Services with PEWS: A trace-theoretical approach,” in: 4th Europ. Conf. on WEB Services (2006).

  4. H. Mannila, H. Toivonen, and A. Verkamo, “Discovering frequent episodes in sequences,” in: Proc. KDD Conf. (1955).

  5. A. Avellone and M. Goldwurm, “Analysis of algorithms for the recognition of rational and context-free trace languages,” Theoretical Inform. and Appl., 32, 141–152 (1998).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Y. Chi, R. Muntz, S. Nijssen, and J. Kok, “Frequent subtree mining: An overview,” Fundamenta Inform., 21, 161–198 (2001).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. M. Crochemore and L. Ilie, “Maximal repetitions in strings,” J. of Comput. and System. Sci., 74, 796–807 (2008).

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. L. Boasson, P. Cegielski, I. Guessarian, and Y. Matiyasevich, “Window-accumulated subsequence problem is linear,” Annals of Pure and Appl. Logic, 113, 74–87 (2001).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. P. Cegielski, I. Guessarian, and Y. Matiyasevich, “Tree inclusion problems,” RAIRO-Theoretical Inform. and Appl., 42, 5–20 (2008).

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. I. Guessarian and P. Cegielski, “Tree inclusions in windows and slices,” in: CSIT Conf. (2000).

  11. J. Messner, “Pattern matching in trace monoids,” Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Comput. Sci. (1997).

  12. V. Dikert and G. Rozenberg, The Book of Traces: Handbook of Formal Languages, Springer, N.Y. (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  13. A. A. Letichevsky, “On the equivalence of automata over a semigroup,” Teoret. Kibernetika, 6, 3–71 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  14. K. V. Shakhbazyan and Yu. H. Shoukourian, “On process languages in finite graphs,” J. of Mathemat. Sci., 101, No. 4, 205–215 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. V. Shahbazyan.

Additional information

Translated from Kibernetika i Sistemnyi Analiz, No. 4, pp. 31–38, July–August 2010.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shahbazyan, K.V., Shoukourian, Y.H. Inclusion problems in trace monoids. Cybern Syst Anal 46, 546–553 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10559-010-9231-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10559-010-9231-0

Keywords

Navigation