Skip to main content
Log in

Communication process in clinical diagnostics: the semiotic approach

  • Published:
Cybernetics and Systems Analysis Aims and scope

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

The nature of a sign, its functions, distinctive features of a sign situation in clinical diagnostics, and also various aspects of transpersonal communications are investigated. Objective indications such as signs, symptoms, and their verbal denotations are considered that are necessary to translate diagnostic information from the level of signals to the level of a message by extraction their meaning during their understanding.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. L. S. Kozachkov, Applied Logic of Informatics [in Russian], Naukova Dumka, Kiev (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  2. C. Morris, “Foundations of theory of signs,” in: Semiotics, Raduga, Moscow (1983), pp. 37–89.

    Google Scholar 

  3. C. S. Peirce, Selected Philosophical Writings [Russian translation], Logos, Moscow (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  4. V. I. Dal’, Explanatory Dictionary of the Living Great-Russian Language: Semiotics [in Russian], Vol. 4, Astral’, Moscow (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. R. Usmanova, Umberto Eco: Paradoxes of Interpretation [in Russian], Propolei, Minsk (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  6. A. S. Kleshchev, F. M. Moskalenko, and M. Yu. Chernyakhovskaya, “A model for the ontology of the medical diagnosis subject area,” NTI, Ser. 2, Part 1, No. 12, 1–7 (2005); Part 2, No. 2, 19–30 (2006).

  7. Yu. K. Subbotin, Methodological Questions of Medical Semiotics [in Russian], Meditsina, Moscow (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  8. N. I. Osipov and P. V. Kopnin, Principal Problems of Diagnosis Theory [in Russian], Izd. Tomsk. Un-ta, Tomsk (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  9. I. N. Dolgopolov, “Denotative theory of signs of clinical diagnostics,” in: XIth Intern. Conf. “System analysis and information technologies,” Vol. 1, KPI, Kiev (2009), pp. 56–70.

    Google Scholar 

  10. I. N. Dolgopolov, “Object technologies of designing corporate information systems of mass medical service,” Cybernetics and Systems Analysis, No. 1, 42–52 (2001).

  11. I. R. Lozovskii, Handbook of Clinical Symptoms and Syndromes [in Russian], Meditsina, Moscow (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  12. V. V. Nalimov, Probabilistic Model of Language [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  13. A. S. Popov and V. G. Kondrat’ev, Essays on the Methodology of Clinical Thinking [in Russian], Meditsina, Leningrad (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  14. I. N. Dolgopolov, “Frames technology in the design of intelligent computer-aided systems for clinical diagnostics,” Cybernetics and Systems Analysis, No. 2, 282–291 (1998).

  15. I. N. Dolgopolov, “Semiotic aspects of the process of understanding in clinical diagnostics,” in: Proc. Vth Intern. Congress “Neuroscience for medicine and psychologies,” Sudak-Moscow (2009), p. 259.

  16. Yu. A. Shreider, “A system description language,” in: System Investigations, Yearbook (1973), Nauka, Moscow (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  17. L. I. Ibraev, “To the problem of the genesis of signs and their classification,” Filosofsk. Nauki, No. 5, 30–39 (1984).

  18. I. N. Dolgopolov, “Research of semiotic aspect of understanding process in clinical diagnostics,” in: Proc. 2nd Intern. Conf. on Inductive Modeling (ICIM 2008), Kyiv (2008), pp. 286–289.

  19. V. V. Tarasenko, “Management paradigms in an information-communicative culture,” in: Synergetics and Social Management, Izd. RAGS, Moscow (1998), pp. 4–67.

    Google Scholar 

  20. S. San’ko, “Cybersemiotics: Cybernetic Cemiotics?” Komp. Vesti, No. 4 (2000), http://www.maurer.demon.co.uk.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to I. N. Dolgopolov.

Additional information

Translated from Kibernetika i Sistemnyi Analiz, No. 5, pp. 60–70, September–October 2009.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dolgopolov, I.N. Communication process in clinical diagnostics: the semiotic approach. Cybern Syst Anal 45, 723–731 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10559-009-9135-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10559-009-9135-z

Keywords

Navigation