Abstract
A new approach is proposed to studying queuing systems with request-specific channels and a common finite buffer for requests of different types. For sharing the common buffer, a virtual partitioning strategy is used. Explicit formulas for blocking probabilities of different requests are derived and optimization problems are solved. The results of numerical experiments are presented.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
F. Kamoun and L. Kleinrock, “Analysis of shared finite storage in a computer networks node environment under general traffic conditions,” IEEE Trans. Commun., 28, No.7, 992–1003 (1980).
T. P. Yum and C. Dou, “Buffer allocation strategies with blocking requirements,” Perform. Eval., 4, No.4, 285–295 (1984).
M. Irland, “Buffer management in a packet switch,” IEEE Trans. Commun., 26, 328–337 (1978).
G. Latouch, “Exponential servers sharing a finite storage: comparison of space allocation politics,” IEEE Trans. Commun., 28, 910–915 (1980).
X. Cheng and A. Akyildiz, “A finite buffer two class queue with different scheduling and push-out schemes,” in: Proc. IEEE INFOCOM 92, May 1992 (1992), pp. 231–241.
N. Endo, “Shared buffer memory switch for an ATM exchange,” IEEE Trans. Commun., 41, 237–245 (1993).
S. Fong and S. Sing, “Performance evaluation of shares-buffer ATM switches under self-similar traffic, ” in: IEEE Int. Performance, Computing and Comm. Conf., Feb. 1997 (1997), pp. 252–258.
A. K. Choudhury and E. L. Hahne, “Dynamic queue length thresholds for shared-memory packet switch,” IEEE/ACM Trans. on Networking, 6, 130–140 (1998).
R. Guerin and V. Peris, “Quality-of-service in a packet networks: Basic mechanism and directions,” Comp. Networks, 31, 1927–1933 (1999).
M. Arpaci and J. A. Copeland, “Buffer management for shared-memory ATM switches,” IEEE Commun. Surveys and Tutorials, 3, No.1 (2000).
A. K. Thareja and A. K. Agrawala, “On the design of optimal policy for sharing finite buffers,” IEEE Trans. Commun., 32, 737–741 (1984).
I. Cidon, L. Georgiadis, R. Guerin, and A. Khamisy, “Optimal buffer sharing,” IEEE J. Select. Areas in Commun., 13, 1229–1240 (1995).
G. L. Wu and J. W. Mark, “A buffer allocation scheme for ATM networks: complete sharing based on virtual partition,” IEEE/ACM Trans. on Networking, 3, 660–670 (1995).
S. Sharma and Y. Viniotis, “Optimal buffer management policies for shared-buffer ATM switching,” IEEE/ACM Trans. on Networking, 7, 575–587 (1999).
V. S. Korolyuk, Stochastic Models of Systems [in Russian], Naukova Dumka, Kiev (1989).
A. Z. Melikov and M. I. Fattakhova, “Computational algorithms to optimization of buffer allocation strategies in a packet switching networks,” Appl. Comput. Math. (Baku), 1, No.1, 51–58 (2002).
A. Z. Melikov and M. I. Fattakhova, “An approximate analysis of service quality of demands in the nodes of integral networks,” Avtom. Vych. Tekhn. No. 2, 41–48 (2002).
L. A. Ponomarenko, A. Z. Melikov, and M. I. Fattakhova, “The generalized algorithm for calculation of the characteristics of Kleinrok-Kamoun strategies for buffer allocation in packet switching networks,” System Research and Information Technologies, No. 2, 63–72 (2002).
A. Z. Melikov and M. I. Fattakhova, “Optimization problems for service quality parameters in integration network nodes,” Avtom. Vych. Tekhn., No. 1, 67–73 (2003).
A. Z. Melikov and F. N. Nagiev, “Approximate calculation of the characteristic of the push-out access strategy in integration network nodes,” Izv. NAN Azerb., Informatika i Probl. Upravl., No. 2–3, 10–15 (2002).
A. G. Greenberg, R. Srikant, and W. Whitt, “Resource sharing for book-ahead and instantaneous-request calls,” IEEE/ACM Trans. on Networking, 7, 10–22 (1999).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Translated from Kibernetika i Sistemnyi Analiz, No. 6, pp. 162–172, November–December 2004.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ponomarenko, L.A., Melikov, A.Z. & Fattakhova, M.I. Numerical methods for analysis of multiflow queuing systems with virtual partition of a common buffer. Cybern Syst Anal 40, 928–935 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10559-005-0032-9
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10559-005-0032-9