Skip to main content
Log in

Hemodynamic Response to Oral Vasodilator Therapy in Systemic Sclerosis-Related Pulmonary Hypertension

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 20 January 2023

This article has been updated

Abstract

Purpose

Although classified as group 1 pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), patients with systemic sclerosis-related pulmonary hypertension (SSc-PH) experience poorer clinical response to PAH therapy and increased mortality compared to those with idiopathic PAH. Due to heterogeneity in phenotypes, identifying patients likely to respond to therapy is challenging. The goal of this study was to determine clinical factors associated with hemodynamic response, defined by a > 20% reduction in pulmonary vascular resistance on repeat right heart catheterization.

Methods

We applied a time-to-event model using a retrospective cohort of 39 patients with precapillary SSc-PH, defined by a mean pulmonary artery pressure of ≥ 25 mmHg and pulmonary arterial wedge pressure (PAWP) ≤ 15 mmHg on right heart catheterization.

Results

Patients with PAWP ≤ 8 mmHg were nearly fourfold more likely to achieve a hemodynamic response compared to those with PAWP > 8 mmHg (HR 3.88; 95% CI: 1.20, 12.57); each 1 mmHg increase in PAWP was associated with a decreased hazard for hemodynamic response (HR 0.84; 95% CI: 0.70, 1.00).

Conclusion

In patients with precapillary SSc-PH, PAWP was associated with time to hemodynamic response, suggesting the importance of subclinical cardiac disease in determining hemodynamic response to oral vasodilator therapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Data Availability

Data will be made available upon request on an individual basis. To protect the rights and privacy of subjects in the study, in addition to removing direct identifiers, indirect identifiers and other information that could lead to “deductive disclosure” of participants’ identities or be considered as identifiers under HIPAA (such as facility names, exact dates of birth, and examination dates) will be removed, ensuring HIPAA compliance. Even though the final dataset will be stripped of identifiers prior to release for sharing, there remains the possibility of deductive disclosure of subjects with unusual characteristics. Thus, the data and associated documentation will be made available to users only under a data sharing agreement that provides for (1) a commitment to using the data only for research purposes and not to identify any individual participant, (2) a commitment to securing the data using appropriate computer technology, and (3) a commitment to destroying or returning the data after analyses are completed. Investigators requesting the data will be required to go through the Boston University Medical Campus and Boston Medical Center IRB and to comply with HIPAA exemption requirements. Disclosures to outside sources will be documented, in compliance with HIPAA requirements.

Change history

References

  1. Yaqub A, Chung L. Epidemiology and risk factors for pulmonary hypertension in systemic sclerosis. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2013;15(1):302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Simonneau G, Montani D, Celermajer DS, et al. Haemodynamic definitions and updated clinical classification of pulmonary hypertension. Eur Respir J. 2019;53(1):1801913.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Galiè N, Humbert M, Vachiery JL, et al. 2015 ESC/ERS guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary hypertension: the Joint Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Pulmonary Hypertension of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Respiratory Society (ERS): Endorsed by: Association for European Paediatric and Congenital Cardiology (AEPC), International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT). Eur Respir J. 2015;46(4):903–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Rosenkranz S, Preston IR. Right heart catheterisation: best practice and pitfalls in pulmonary hypertension. Eur Respir Rev. 2015;24(138):642–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Fisher MR, Mathai SC, Champion HC, et al. Clinical differences between idiopathic and scleroderma-related pulmonary hypertension. Arthritis Rheum. 2006;54(9):3043–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Launay D, Sobanski V, Hachulla E, Humbert M. Pulmonary hypertension in systemic sclerosis: different phenotypes. Eur Respir Rev. 2017;26(145):170056.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fox BD, Shimony A, Langlebon D, et al. High prevalence of occult left heart disease in scleroderma-pulmonary hypertension. Eur Respir J. 2013;42(4):1083–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lui JK, Sangani RA, Chen CA, et al. Prognostic value of cardiac axis deviation in systemic sclerosis-related pulmonary hypertension. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2022;74(7):1219–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kahan A, Allanore Y. Primary myocardial involvement in systemic sclerosis. Rheumatol (Oxford). 2006;45(Suppl 4):iv14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Tonelli AR, Alnuaimat H, Mubarak K. Pulmonary vasodilator testing and use of calcium channel blockers in pulmonary arterial hypertension. Respir Med. 2010;104(4):481–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Benza RL, Gomberg-Maitland M, Miller DP, et al. The REVEAL Registry risk score calculator in patients newly diagnosed with pulmonary arterial hypertension. Chest. 2012;141(2):354–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Benza RL, Gomberg-Maitland M, Elliott CG, et al. Predicting survival in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension: the REVEAL risk score calculator 2.0 and comparison with ESC/ERS-based risk assessment strategies. Chest. 2019;156(2):323–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Benza RL, Kanwar MK, Raina A, et al. Development and validation of an abridged version of the REVEAL 2.0 risk score calculator, REVEAL Lite 2, for use in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension. Chest. 2021;159(1):337–46.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

J. K. L. was supported by NIH/NHLBI 1F32HL156614-01 and received research support from United Therapeutics. K. R. G. was supported by a Parker B. Francis Fellowship Award. A. M. B. was supported by NIH/NHLBI 1R01HL155955-01A1. D. M. G. was supported by the American Heart Association: FTF17FTF33670369. R. S. W. was supported in part by resources from the VA Boston Healthcare system. M. P. L. was supported by NIAMS CCCR P30 AR072571. E. S. K. was supported by NIH/NHLBI 1UG3 HL143192-01A1, NCATS 2UL1TR001430-05A1, and HRSA U1EMC27864-08–00 and received research support from Bayer, Forma Therapeutics, Novartis, and United Therapeutics.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

J. K. L.: conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, investigation, methodology, roles/writing—original draft, writing—review and editing. R. A. S.: data curation, methodology, writing—review and editing. K. R. G.: formal analysis, methodology, writing—review and editing. J. V.: data curation, methodology, writing—review and editing. M. A. T.: data curation, methodology, writing—review and editing. A M. B.: data curation, methodology, writing—review and editing. D. M. G.: methodology, writing—review and editing. R. S. W.: methodology, writing—review and editing. M. P. L.: formal analysis, investigation, methodology, writing—review and editing. E. S. K.: conceptualization, formal analysis, investigation, methodology, writing—review and editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Justin K. Lui.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate

This was retrospective, single-center, observational study of patients with systemic sclerosis enrolled into the Scleroderma Biorepository at Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine. At the time of enrollment, patients were consented for inclusion in this longitudinal clinical registry. The study was approved by the Boston University Medical Campus and Boston Medical Center Institutional Review Board.

Consent for Publication

The authors affirm that the study participants provided informed consent for publication of results in a medical book or journal.

Competing Interests

J. K. L. received research support from United Therapeutics. E. S. K. received royalties for 3 topic cards in UpToDate. She is a consultant/advisory board member for Bluebird Bio, FORMA Therapeutics, Vertex, and CSL Behring for sickle cell disease-related clinical trials (no conflict with the present work). All other authors declare no financial interests.

Disclaimer

The views presented here do not necessarily reflect the views of the Department of Veterans Affairs or the US government.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lui, J.K., Sangani, R.A., Gillmeyer, K.R. et al. Hemodynamic Response to Oral Vasodilator Therapy in Systemic Sclerosis-Related Pulmonary Hypertension. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10557-022-07420-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10557-022-07420-1

Keywords

Navigation