Skip to main content
Log in

Sacubitril/Valsartan Can Reduce Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence After Catheter Ablation in Patients with Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

This study compared the effectiveness of sacubitril/valsartan (SV) vs. valsartan (V) for treating persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) after radio-frequency catheter ablation (RFCA).

Methods

Patients with persistent AF who received RFCA were randomly assigned to the SV or V treatment group with the intervention lasting for 12 months. The primary outcome included any atrial arrhythmia episode lasting ≥ 30 s after a 3-month blanking period. The secondary outcome included any atrial arrhythmia episode lasting ≥ 24 h or requiring cardioversion after a 3-month blanking period. The H2FPEF score was used to assess the possibility of patients suffering from heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

Results

A total of 143 patients with persistent AF who received RFCA were randomized for the study, with 5 patients failing to follow-up. Among them, 29 (42%) out of 69 patients receiving V and 15 (21.7%) out of 69 patients receiving SV reached the primary endpoint (P < 0.001). A total of 26 (37.7%) out of 69 patients receiving V and 7 (10.1%) out of 69 patients receiving SV reached the secondary endpoint (P < 0.001). A decrease in the H2FPEF score after a 1-year follow-up seemed to be related to the recurrence of AF (OR, 0.065; 95% CI: 0.018–0.238, P < 0.001).

Conclusions

SV can decrease AF recurrence after catheter ablation in patients with persistent AF at the 1-year follow-up. The mechanism for this process may be related to the reduction in the H2FPEF score in patients with preserved ejection fraction heart failure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Data will be made available on reasonable request.

References

  1. Ziegler PD, Glotzer TV, Daoud EG, et al. Detection of previously undiagnosed atrial fibrillation in patients with stroke risk factors and usefulness of continuous monitoring in primary stroke prevention. Am J Cardiol. 2012;110(9):1309–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Wang TJ, Larson MG, Levy D, et al. Temporal relations of atrial fibrillation and congestive heart failure and their joint influence on mortality: the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. 2003;107(23):2920–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Shih HT, Webb CR, Conway WA, Peterson E, Tilley B, Goldstein S. Frequency and significance of cardiac arrhythmias in chronic obstructive lung disease. Chest. 1988;94(1):44–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Dunning J, Treasure T, Versteegh M, Nashef SA, EACTS Audit and Guidelines Committee. Guidelines on the prevention and management of de novo atrial fibrillation after cardiac and thoracic surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2006;30(6):852–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. January CT, Wann LS, Calkins H, et al. 2019 AHA/ACC/HRS focused update of the 2014 AHA/ACC /HRS guideline for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. Heart Rhythm. 2019;16(8):e66–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Tilz RR, Rillig A, Thum AM, et al. Catheter ablation of long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation: 5-year outcomes of the Hamburg Sequential Ablation Strategy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60(19):1921–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Desai AS, McMurray JJ, Packer M, et al. Effect of the angiotensin-receptor- neprilysin inhibitor LCZ696 compared with enalapril on mode of death in heart failure patients. Eur Heart J. 2015;36(30):1990–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Martens P, Nuyens D, Rivero-Ayerza M, et al. Sacubitril/valsartan reduces ventricular arrhythmias in parallel with left ventricular reverse remodeling in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Clin Res Cardiol. 2019;108(10):1074–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. de Diego C, González-Torres L, Núñez JM, et al. Effects of angiotensin-neprilysin inhibition compared to angiotensin inhibition on ventricular arrhythmias in reduced ejection fraction patients under continuous remote monitoring of implantable defibrillator devices. Heart Rhythm. 2018;15(3):395–402.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Valentim Gonçalves A, Pereira-da-Silva T, Galrinho A, et al. Antiarrhythmic effect of sacubitril-valsartan: cause or consequence of clinical improvement? J Clin Med. 2019;8(6):869.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Suo Y, Yuan M, Li H, et al. Sacubitril/valsartan improves left atrial and left atrial appendage function in patients with atrial fibrillation and in pressure overload-induced mice. Front Pharmacol. 2019;10:1285.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Wang Q, Shang Y, Wang Z, et al. Perindopril for the prevention of atrial fibrillation recurrence after radiofrequency catheter ablation: one-year experience. Heart Rhythm. 2016;13(10):2040–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. De Vecchis R, Paccone A, Di Maio M. Favorable effects of sacubitril/valsartan on the peak atrial longitudinal strain in patients with chronic heart failure and a history of one or more episodes of atrial fibrillation: a retrospective cohort study. J Clin Med Res. 2020;12(2):100–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Stokes MB, Sanders P. Does left ventricular systolic function matter? Treating atrial fibrillation in HFrEF versus HFpEF. Cardiol Clin. 2019;37(2):157–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Reddy YNV, Carter RE, Obokata M, Redfield MM, Borlaug BA. A simple, evidence-based approach to help guide diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Circulation. 2018;138(9):861–70.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Camm AJ, Lip GY, De Caterina R, et al. 2012 focused update of the ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation: an update of the 2010 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation. Developed with the special contribution of the European Heart Rhythm Association. Eur Heart J. 2012;33(21):2719–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Cacciatore F, Abete P, Mazzella F, et al. Six-minute walking test but not ejection fraction predicts mortality in elderly patients undergoing cardiac rehabilitation following coronary artery bypass grafting. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2012;19(6):1401–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Newman D. Quality of life as an endpoint for atrial fibrillation research: pitfalls and practice. Heart Rhythm. 2004;1(2 Suppl):B20–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sullivan M, Karlsson J, Ware JE Jr. The Swedish SF-36 Health Survey–I. Evaluation of data quality, scaling assumptions, reliability and construct validity across general populations in Sweden. Soc Sci Med. 1995;41(10):1349–58.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ichijo S, Miyazaki S, Kusa S, et al. Impact of catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation on long-term clinical outcomes in patients with heart failure. J Cardiol. 2018;72(3):240–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Santos AB, Roca GQ, Claggett B, et al. Prognostic relevance of left atrial dysfunction in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Circ Heart Fail. 2016;9(4):e002763.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Chang CM, Wu TJ, Zhou S, et al. Nerve sprouting and sympathetic hyperinnervation in a canine model of atrial fibrillation produced by prolonged right atrial pacing. Circulation. 2001;103(1):22–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Swissa M, Zhou S, Paz O, Fishbein MC, Chen LS, Chen PS. Canine model of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and paroxysmal atrial tachycardia. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2005;289(5):H1851–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Masuda M, Yamada T, Mizuno H, et al. Impact of atrial fibrillation ablation on cardiac sympathetic nervous system in patients with and without heart failure. Int J Cardiol. 2015;199:65–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kang KW, Kim TH, Park J, et al. Long-term changes in heart rate variability after radiofrequency catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: 1-year follo w-up study with irrigation tip catheter. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2014;25(7):693–700.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (Grant no. 2016YFC1301003), the National Science Foundation of China (Grant nos. 30900612, 81800231, and 81873484), the Clinical Research Fund of Zhejiang Provincial Medical Association (2015ZYC-A16 and 2018ZYC-A11), the Nature Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province (Grant no. LZ16H020001), the grant of Medical Science Research Foundation of Zhejiang Province (Grant no. 2018ZD017), grants from the Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation (Grant no. LY15H020002 and Y17H020020), and a grant from the Department of Science and Technology, Zhejiang Province (Grant no. LGF19H020011), People’s Republic of China.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Liangrong Zheng, Qiqi Wang, Qi Xia, and Jie Han conceived the study. Qiqi Wang, Chengui Zhuo, and Zewei Sun designed the study. Jiajia Jiang and Jianqiang Zhao drafted the paper. Bifeng Wu, Dongchen Zhou, and Zheyue Shu collected the data. Miao Chen, Heng Chen, and Biqi Zhang analyzed and interpreted the data. All authors provide comments on the draft. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Liangrong Zheng.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval

The institutional review boards at Zhejiang University (Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China) approved the review of these data. The study was registered at http://www.chictr.org.cn (identifier: ChiCTR-TRC- 2000034257).

Consent for Publication

All authors agree to publish.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all patients included in the study.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

ESM 1

(DOCX 11.9 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, Q., Zhuo, C., Xia, Q. et al. Sacubitril/Valsartan Can Reduce Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence After Catheter Ablation in Patients with Persistent Atrial Fibrillation. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther 37, 549–560 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10557-022-07315-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10557-022-07315-1

Keywords

Navigation