Skip to main content

Do Limitations in the Design of PARADIGM-HF Justify the Slow Real World Uptake of Sacubitril/Valsartan (Entresto)?

A Correction to this article was published on 01 October 2018

This article has been updated

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Change history

  • 01 October 2018

    The original version of this article unfortunately contained a mistake. There was a typo in the second sentence of the paragraph under the section Was the Dose of Drugs Fair?; "320 mg twice a day" should read "160mg twice a day". The corrected paragraph is shown below.

References

  1. Packer M, McMurray JJ, Desai AS, et al. PARADIGM-HF Investigators and Committees. Angiotensin-neprilysin inhibition versus enalapril in heart failure. N Engl J Med 2014; 371:993–1004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Uptake of new heart failure drug slow, say makers. http://www.cardiomyopathy.org/news%2D%2Dmedia/latest-news/post/126-uptake-of-new-heart-failure-drug-slow-say-makers. Updated November 6, 2015. Accessed 18 Oct, 2017.

  3. Packer M. Kicking the tyres of a heart failure trial: physician response to the approval of sacubitril/valsartan in the USA. Eur J Heart Fail. 2016;18:1211–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Packer M, Armstrong WM, Rothstein JM, Emmett M. Sacubitril-valsartan in heart failure: why are more physicians not prescribing it? Ann Intern Med. 2016;165:735–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Packer M, Poole-Wilson PA, Armstrong PW, Cleland JGF, Horowitz JD, Massie BM, et al. Comparative effects of low and high doses of the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, lisinopril, on morbidity and mortality in chronic heart failure. Circulation. 1999;100:2312–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Khan MS, Fonarow GC, Ahmed A, Greene SJ, Vaduganathan M, Khan H, et al. Dose of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers and outcomes in heart failure: a meta-analysis. Circulation: Heart Failure. 2017;10:e003956.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Pablos-Mendez A, Barr RG, Shea S. Run-in periods in randomized trials: implications for the application of results in clinical practice. JAMA. 1998;279(3):222–5.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vinay Prasad.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ahn, R., Prasad, V. Do Limitations in the Design of PARADIGM-HF Justify the Slow Real World Uptake of Sacubitril/Valsartan (Entresto)?. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther 32, 633–635 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10557-018-6830-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10557-018-6830-x