Skip to main content

Cost-effectiveness of Dabigatran and Rivaroxaban Compared with Warfarin for Stroke Prevention in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation

Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy volume 28, pages 575–585 (2014)Cite this article

Abstract

Purpose

This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of dabigatran and rivaroxaban compared with warfarin for the prevention of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) in Singapore.

Methods

A Markov model was constructed to compare the lifetime costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) of dabigatran 110 and 150 mg, rivaroxaban 20 mg and adjusted-dose warfarin from the perspective of the Singapore healthcare system, using clinical data from published studies, utilities from a patient-reported survey and costs from hospital databases. The target population was a hypothetical cohort of 65-year-old AF patients with no contraindications to anticoagulation.

Results

In the base-case analysis, the QALYs were 8.75 with warfarin, 8.73 with dabigatran 110 mg, 8.82 with dabigatran 150 mg, and 9.33 with rivaroxaban. The costs were Singapore dollar (SG$) 34,648 for warfarin, SG$54,919 for dabigatran 110 mg, SG$50,484 for dabigatran 150 mg and SG$51,975 for rivaroxaban. The ICER of rivaroxaban versus warfarin was SG$29,697 (US$26,727) per QALY. Rivaroxaban and warfarin had extended dominance over the high-dose dabigatran. The low-dose dabigatran was dominated by warfarin. Deterministic sensitivity analyses showed that the ICER of rivaroxaban versus warfarin was sensitive to cost of rivaroxaban and utilities for rivaroxaban and warfarin. Probability sensitivity analysis demonstrated that the probability of rivaroxaban being the optimal choice was 97.8 % and 99.5 % at a willingness-to-pay threshold of SG$65,000 (US$58,500) and SG$130,000 (US$117,000) per QALY, respectively.

Conclusion

Rivaroxaban may be a cost-effective alternative to warfarin for the prevention of stroke in patients with AF in Singapore.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

43,34 €

Price includes VAT (Finland)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  1. Singer DE, Albers GW, Dalen JE, Go AS, Halperin JL, Manning WJ. Antithrombotic therapy in atrial fibrillation: the seventh ACCP conference on antithrombotic and thrombolytic therapy. Chest. 2004;126:429S–56S.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. World Health Organization. Fact sheet—the top 10 causes of death in 2011. 2012. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs310/en/index.html. Accessed 1 Aug 2013.

  3. Albers GW, Amarenco P, Easton JD, Sacco RL, Teal P. Antithrombotic and thrombolytic therapy for ischemic stroke: the seventh ACCP conference on antithrombotic and thrombolytic therapy. Chest. 2004;126:483S–512S.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Singapore Ministry of Health. Singapore health facts: population and vital statistics in 2012. 2013. http://www.moh.gov.sg/content/moh_web/home/statistics/Health_Facts_Singapore/Population_And_Vital_Statistics.html. Accessed 26 Aug 2013.

  5. Ansell J, Hirsh J, Poller L, Bussey H, Jacobson A, Hylek E. The pharmacology and management of the vitamin K antagonists: the seventh ACCP conference on antithrombotic and thrombolytic therapy. Chest. 2004;126:204S–33S.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hylek EM, Go AS, Chang Y, Jensvold NG, Henault LE, Selby JV, et al. Effect of intensity of oral anticoagulation on stroke severity and mortality in atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:1019–26.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Levine MN, Raskob G, Beyth RJ, Kearon C, Schulman S. Hemorrhagic complications of anticoagulant treatment: the seventh ACCP conference on antithrombotic and thrombolytic therapy. Chest. 2004;126:287S–310S.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Merli GJ, Tzanis G. Warfarin: what are the clinical implications of an out-of-range-therapeutic international normalized ratio. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2009;27:293–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Connolly SJ, Ezekowitz MD, Yusuf S, Reilly PA, Wallentin L. Newly identified events in the RE-LY trial. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:1875–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Patel MR, Mahaffey KW, Garg J, Pan G, Singer DE, Hacke W, et al. Rivaroxaban versus warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:883–91.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Singapore Department of Statistics. Singapore’s 2012 per capita GDP. 2013. http://www.singstat.gov.sg/statistics/latest_data.html. Accessed 3 July 2013.

  12. The World Bank. 2012 PPP conversion factor (GDP) to market exchange rate ratio. 2013. http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/PA.NUS.PPPC.RF. Accessed 2 Feb 2014.

  13. World Health Organization. CHOosing Interventions that are Cost Effective (WHO-CHOICE): cost-effectiveness thresholds. 2013. http://www.who.int/choice/costs/CER_thresholds/en/index.html. Accessed 4 Dec 2013.

  14. Lee S, Anglade MW, Pham D, Pisacane R, Kluger J, Coleman CI. Cost-effectiveness of rivaroxaban compared to warfarin for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. Am J Cardiol. 2012;110:845–51.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gage BF, Waterman AD, Shannon W, Boechler M, Rich MW, Radford MJ. Validation of clinical classification schemes for predicting stroke: results from the National Registry of Atrial Fibrillation. JAMA. 2001;285:2864–70.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Laupacis. Risk factors for stroke and efficacy of antithrombotic therapy in atrial fibrillation: analysis of pooled data from five randomized controlled trials. Arch Intern Med. 1994;154:1449–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Freeman JV, Zhu RP, Owens DK, Garber AM, Hutton DW, Go AS, et al. Cost-effectiveness of dabigatran compared with warfarin for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. Ann Intern Med. 2011;154:1–11.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ariesen MJ, Claus SP, Rinkel GJ, Algra A. Risk factors for intracerebral hemorrhage in the general population: a systematic review. Stroke. 2003;34:2060–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Singapore Department of Statistics. Population trends in 2013. 2014. http://www.singstat.gov.sg/publications/publications_and_papers/population_and_population_structure/population2013.pdf. Accessed 25 Jan 2014.

  20. Dries DL, Exner DV, Gersh BJ, Domanski MJ, Waclawiw MA, Stevenson LW. Atrial fibrillation is associated with an increased risk for mortality and heart failure progression in patients with asymptomatic and symptomatic left ventricular systolic dysfunction: a retrospective analysis of the SOLVD trials—studies of left ventricular dysfunction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998;32:695–703.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wyse DG, Love JC, Yao Q, Carlson MD, Cassidy P, Greene LH, et al. Atrial fibrillation: a risk factor for increased mortality—an AVID registry analysis. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2001;5:267–73.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Dennis MS, Burn JP, Sandercock PA, Bamford JM, Wade DT, Warlow CP. Long-term survival after first-ever stroke: the Oxfordshire community stroke project. Stroke. 1993;24:796–800.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Yuan Z, Bowlin S, Einstadter D, Cebul RD, Conners Jr AR, Rimm AA. Atrial fibrillation as a risk factor for stroke: a retrospective cohort study of hospitalized medicare beneficiaries. Am J Public Health. 1998;88:395–400.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Sherman DG, Kim SG, Boop BS, Corley SD, DiMarco JP, Hart RG, et al. Occurrence and characteristics of stroke events in the Atrial Fibrillation Follow-up Investigation of Sinus Rhythm Management (AFFIRM) study. Arch Intern Med. 2005;165:1185–91.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Cantor SB. Cost-effectiveness analysis, extended dominance, and ethics: a quantitative assessment. Med Dec Making. 1994;14:259–65.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Harrington AR, Armstrong EP, Nolan Jr PE, Malone DC. Cost-effectiveness of apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and warfarin for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. Stroke. 2013;44:1676–81.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Shah SV, Gage BF. Cost-effectiveness of dabigatran for stroke prophylaxis in atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 2011;123:2562–70.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. NHS Choices. Anticoagulant medicines: pradaxa side-effects. 2013. http://www.nhs.uk/conditions/anticoagulant-medicines/pages/MedicineSideEffects.aspx?condition=Blood%20clotting&medicine=Pradaxa&preparation=Pradaxa%20110mg%20capsules. Accessed 20 Jan 2013.

  29. MedlinePlus. Drugs and supplements: dabigatran. 2013. http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/druginfo/meds/a610024.html. Accessed 20 Jan 2013.

  30. O’Brien CL, Gage BF. Costs and effectiveness of ximelagatran for stroke prophylaxis in chronic atrial fibrillation. JAMA. 2005;293:699–706.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Coyle D, Coyle K, Cameron C, Lee K, Kelly S, Steiner S, et al. Cost-effectiveness of new oral anticoagulants compared with warfarin in preventing stroke and other cardiovascular events in patients with atrial fibrillation. Value Health. 2013;16:498–506.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Hylek EM, Singer DE. Risk factors for intracranial hemorrhage in outpatients taking warfarin. Ann Intern Med. 1994;120:897–902.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Hohnloser SH, Oldgren J, Yang S, Wallentin L, Ezekowitz M, Reilly P, et al. Myocardial ischemic events in patients with atrial fibrillation treated with dabigatran or warfarin in the RE-LY (randomized evaluation of long-term anticoagulation therapy) trial. Circulation. 2012;125:669–76.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. You JHS, Tsui KKN, Wong RSM, Cheng G. Cost-effectiveness of dabigatran versus genotype-guided management of warfarin therapy for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e39640.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Krumholz HM, Merrill AR, Schone EM, Schreiner GC, Chen J, Bradley EH, et al. Patterns of hospital performance in acute myocardial infarction and heart failure 30-day mortality and readmission. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcome. 2009;2:407–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge the National University of Singapore for providing us with a research grant.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, One Brigham Circle, 1620 Tremont Street, 4-020, Boston, MA, 02120, USA

    Ye Wang

  2. Department of Clinical Epidemiology & Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada

    Feng Xie

  3. Department of Pharmacy, Singapore General Hospital, Outram Park, Singapore

    Ming Chai Kong

  4. Department of Hematology, Singapore General Hospital, Outram Park, Singapore

    Lai Heng Lee & Heng Joo Ng

  5. Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Science, National University of Singapore, Level 3, Block S4A, 18 Science Drive 4, Singapore, 117543, Singapore

    Yu Ko

Authors
  1. Ye Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Feng Xie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ming Chai Kong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Lai Heng Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Heng Joo Ng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Yu Ko
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Ye Wang or Yu Ko.

Appendix

Appendix

Part 1

Descriptions of health states

Descriptions of health states (available upon request) were developed based on preference assessment guidelines, medical textbooks, published literature and expert opinions (i.e., two researchers with Ph.D. degrees in pharmacy, two physicians with master’s degrees in medicine, a clinical pharmacist with a master’s degree in pharmacy and a Ph.D. candidate in pharmacy). Important attributes of the health states were described. Examples are shown below.

Well on warfarin

You need to take an oral medicine once daily with occasional dose adjustments. You need to attend the outpatient clinic at a hospital or polyclinic about once a month for a blood test. You are not able to drink too much alcohol. You may bruise more easily, but generally you are in your good health state.

Well on dabigatran

You need to take an oral medicine twice daily with a fixed dose. You may have dyspepsia (i.e., stomach discomfort or burning pain), but generally you are in your good health state.

Well on rivaroxaban

You need to take an oral medicine once daily with a fixed dose. Generally you are in your good health state.

Part 2

Table 3 Parameterization of distributions for the probabilistic sensitivity analysis
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, Y., Xie, F., Kong, M.C. et al. Cost-effectiveness of Dabigatran and Rivaroxaban Compared with Warfarin for Stroke Prevention in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther 28, 575–585 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10557-014-6558-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10557-014-6558-1

Keywords

  • Anticoagulation
  • Atrial fibrillation
  • Cost-effectiveness
  • Dabigatran
  • Rivaroxaban
  • Warfarin