Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of the Effects of Levosimendan and Papaverine on Human Internal Mammary Artery and Saphenous Vein

  • Published:
Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Internal mammary artery (IMA) and saphenous vein (SV) are two most common vessels used in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). In the present study, the effect of levosimendan (a novel inotropic/vasodilator compound) and papaverine are compared, using IMA and SV obtained from CABG patients.

Methods

Unused segments of IMA and SV of each patient were cut into two rings of 3 mm length. Four rings (two from IMA, two from SV) were suspended in an organ bath, contracted with norepinephrine and then the responses to the cumulative concentrations of levosimendan and papaverine were recorded.

Results

Levosimendan relaxed IMA but failed to relax SV completely. In addition, its IC50 value (concentration which reduced 50% of initial contraction) to relax SV was about 300 times higher than the IC50 value for IMA. Its arteriodilating concentration was in the range of its clinically effective inotropic concentration. Papaverine relaxed both vascular preparations completely. Its IC50 value was about 2.4 times higher toward SV in comparison to that of IMA.

Conclusions

It is concluded that levosimendan is much more potent to relax norepinephrine-induced contraction of human IMA in comparison to its effect on human SV. It may have the potential to be used as a mixed inotropic/arteriodilator compound in several clinical settings including CABG in which it can increase cardiac contractility and prevent IMA vasospasm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jett GK, Arcidi JM Jr, Dorsey LM, Hatcher CR Jr, Guyton RA. Vasoactive drug effects on blood flow in internal mammary artery and saphenous vein grafts. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1987;94:2–11.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Formica F, Ferro O, Brustia M, Corti F, Colagrande L, Bosisio E, et al. Effects of papaverine and glycerylnitrate-verapamil solution as topical and intraluminal vasodilators for internal thoracic artery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006;81:120–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Mahmoudian M, Shafiei M, Mirkhani H, Omrani GR. Effects of different vasodilators on human internal mammary artery in vitro. Adv Exp Med Biol. 1999;471:419–26.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Uydeş-Doğan BS, Nebigil M, Aslamaci S, Onuk E, Kanzik I, Akar F. The comparison of vascular reactivities of arterial and venous grafts to vasodilators: management of graft spasm. Int J Cardiol. 1996;53:137–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. He GW, Rosenfeldt FL, Buxton BF, Angus JA. Reactivity of human isolated internal mammary artery to constrictor and dilator agents. Implications for treatment of internal mammary artery spasm. Circulation. 1989;80:I141–50.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. DiNardo JA, Bert A, Schwartz MJ, Johnson RG, Thurer RL, Weintraub RM. Effects of vasoactive drugs on flows through left internal mammary artery and saphenous vein grafts in man. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1991;102:730–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Holley AD, Ziegenfuss M. Levosimendan: a new option in acute cardiac failure. Emerg Med Australas. 2006;18:505–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Yildiz O, Seyrek M, Yildirim V, Demirkilic U, Nacitarhan C. Potassium channel-related relaxation by levosimendan in the human internal mammary artery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006;81:1715–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Höhn J, Pataricza J, Petri A, Tóth GK, Balogh A, Varró A, et al. Levosimendan interacts with potassium channel blockers in human saphenous veins. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2004;94:271–3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Rang HP, Dale MM, Ritter M, Flower RJ. Rang & Dale’s pharmacology. 6th ed. Churchill Livingston; 2007.

  11. Montes FR, Echeverri D, Buitrago L, Ramírez I, Giraldo JC, Maldonado JD, et al. The vasodilatory effects of levosimendan on the human internal mammary artery. Anesth Analg. 2006;103:1094–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Antila S, Kivikko M, Lehtonen L, Eha J, Heikkilä A, Pohjanjousi P, et al. Pharmacokinetics of levosimendan and its circulating metabolites in patients with heart failure after an extended continuous infusion of levosimendan. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2004;57:412–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Giessler C, Wangemann T, Silber RE, Dhein S, Brodde OE. Norepinephrine-induced contraction of human saphenous vein and human internal mammary artery: involvement of different alpha-adrenoceptor subtypes. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2002;366:104–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Pataricza J, Hõhn J, Petri A, Balogh A, Papp JG. Comparison of the vasorelaxing effect of cromakalim and the new inodilator, levosimendan, in human isolated portal vein. J Pharm Pharmacol. 2000;52:213–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Nieminen MS, Akkila J, Hasenfuss G, Kleber FX, Lehtonen LA, Mitrovic V, et al. Hemodynamic and neurohumoral effects of continuous infusion of levosimendan in patients with congestive heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;36:1903–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Slawsky MT, Colucci WS, Gottlieb SS, Greenberg BH, Haeusslein E, Hare J, et al. Acute hemodynamic and clinical effects of levosimendan in patients with severe heart failure. Circulation. 2000;102:2222–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Poelzl G, Zwick RH, Grander W, Metzler B, Jonetzko P, Frick M, et al. Safety and effectiveness of levosimendan in patients with predominant right heart failure. Herz. 2008;33:368–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hurax C, Makita T, Montes F, Szlam F, Levy JH. Comparative evaluation of the effects of multiple vasodilators on human internal mammary artery. Anesthesiology. 1998;88:1654–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gao YJ, Yang H, Teoh K, Lee RM. Detrimental effects of papaverine on the human internal thoracic artery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003;126:179–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Dr. S. Lotfi, cardiovascular surgeon at University Hospital Aachen, Germany, for his help and comments; Ms. R. Gholipour for her technical assistance; Ms. A. Besharati and Ms. S. Saberi , the cardiovascular nurses of Namazi and Shahid Faghihi hospitals for their cooperation to obtain human vascular tissues.

This work was supported by grant No. 87-4229 from Vice-chancellory of Research, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hossein Mirkhani.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mirkhani, H., Shafa, M. & Khazraei, H. Comparison of the Effects of Levosimendan and Papaverine on Human Internal Mammary Artery and Saphenous Vein. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther 23, 355–359 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10557-009-6197-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10557-009-6197-0

Key words

Navigation