Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Comparison of Corrosion Monitoring Instrument Methods for Hydrocarbon Processing Object Conditions

  • MATERIALS SCIENCE. CORROSION PROTECTION
  • Published:
Chemical and Petroleum Engineering Aims and scope

Various corrosion monitoring methods are used in order to monitor the corrosion state of gas object equipment. The main parameter for evaluation is corrosion rate. In addition to the main gravimetric method, two more determination methods are used: an electrical resistance ER-method, and linear polarization resistance LPR-method. In the course of testing ER- and LPR-probes the possibility of their use in corrosive-aggressive conditions of hydrocarbon processing facilities, as well as the influence of various factors on the data obtained for corrosion rate are evaluated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A. V. Prokopov, V. A. Istomin, D. M. Fedulov, and A. G. Dedov, “Increasing the efficiency of hydrocarbons C5+ extraction from the gas of condensate fields by a low temperature absorption process,” Theor. Found. Chem. Eng., 53, No. 5, 886 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. R. K. Vagapov and D. N. Zapevalov, “Corrosion activity of operating conditions for the steel equipment and pipelines in the plants extracting CO2 -containing gases,” Metallurgist, 65, No. 1-2, 50–61 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. V. V. Burov, “Contemporary approaches to resolving the problem of protecting OPP equipment fro corrosion,” Neft. i Neftekhimi, Nauch. Tekhn. Dost Pered. Opyt., No. 3, 64–68 (2013).

  4. A. Yu. Koryakin, V. F. Kobeychev, V. V. Aleksandrov, et al., “Experience of modernizing production equipment for gas preparation of the Achimov gas deposit of the Urengoi oil and gas condensate deposits,” Gaz. Prom. Special issue, No. 1, 64–70 (2009).

  5. M. L. Medvedeva and V. V. Gur’yanpov, “Corrosion condition of installations for natural gas purification from acid components,” Zashch. Met., 38, No. 3, 322–326 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  6. D. S. de Freitas, I. L. M. Gonçalves, and G. I. Vaz, “The effect of ethanol added to the natural gas stream on the top of line corrosion: An approach on vapor phase condensation and carbonic acid generation yield,” J. Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 96, Art. 104297 (2021).

  7. R. K. Vagapov, “Comparing and interpreting results of processing in-line inspection data for corrosive gas transportation conditions,” Russian Journal of Nondestructive Testing, 57, No. 8, 717–726 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. GОSТ 9.514-99. ЕSZКS. Metal Corrosion Inhibitors for Aqueous Systems. Electrochemical Method for Determining Protective Capacity.

  9. GOST Р 9.905-2007. ЕSZKS. Corrosion Test Method. General Requirements.

  10. R. K. Vagapov and I. S. Tomskiy, “Dependence of corrosion process rate on carbon dioxide medium containing flow rate,” Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, 57, No. 5-6, 507–512 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Y. Chen, M. Gopal, and W. P. Jepson, “Comparison of ECN and EIS measurement for corrosion monitoring under multiphase flow conditions,” in: NACE Corrosion Conference (1997), Paper 276.

  12. R. K. Vagapov, R. R. Kantyukov, and D. N. Zapevalov, “Internal corrosion and anticorrosion protection of offshore facilities in the presence of increased amounts of carbon dioxide,” Intern. J. Corrosion and Scale Inhibition, 10, No. 3, 1128–1140 (2021).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. R. K. Vagapov, R. R. Kantyukov, and D. N. Zapevalov, “Investigation of the corrosiveness of moisture condensation conditions at gas production facilities in the presence of CO2 ,” Intern. J. Corrosion and Scale Inhibition, 10, No. 3, 994–1010 (2021).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. C. Torres, C. Costa, A. Pereira, et al., “Corrosion failure analysis in a biodiesel plant using electrical resistance probes,” Engineering Failure Analysis, 66, 365–372 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Gazprom VNIIGAZ, Razvilka, Moscow Region, Russia

    R. K. Vagapov, K. А. Ibatullin & V. V. Yarkovoi

Authors
  1. R. K. Vagapov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. K. А. Ibatullin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. V. V. Yarkovoi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. K. Vagapov.

Additional information

Translated from Khimicheskoe i Neftegazovoe Mashinostroenie, Vol. 58, No. 4, pp. 38−41, April, 2022.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vagapov, R.K., Ibatullin, K.А. & Yarkovoi, V.V. Comparison of Corrosion Monitoring Instrument Methods for Hydrocarbon Processing Object Conditions. Chem Petrol Eng 58, 328–333 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10556-022-01095-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10556-022-01095-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation