Skip to main content
Log in

The value of serial echocardiography in risk assessment of patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Progression from paroxysmal to persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. We examined the association of left atrial (LA) remodeling by serial echocardiography, and AF progression over an extended follow-up period. Two-hundred ninety patients (mean age 61  ±  11 years, 73% male) who underwent transthoracic echocardiography performed at first presentation for non-valvular paroxysmal AF (PAF) and repeat echocardiogram 1-year later, were followed for progression to persistent AF. LA and left ventricular (LV) dimensions, volumes, LA reservoir, conduit and booster pump strains, LV global longitudinal systolic strain (GLS) assessed by 2D speckle tracking, and PA-TDI (time delay between electrical and mechanical LA activation– reflecting the extent of LA fibrosis) were compared on serial echocardiography. Sixty-nine (24%) patients developed persistent AF over a mean follow-up period of 6.3 years. At baseline, patients with subsequent persistent AF had larger LA dimensions (46 mm vs. 42 mm, p < 0.001), indexed LA volumes (41 ml/m2 vs. 34 ml/m2, p < 0.001), lower LA reservoir and conduit strain (17.6% vs. 27.6%, p < 0.001; 10.5% vs. 16.3%, p < 0.001; respectively) and longer PA-TDI (155 ms vs. 132 ms, p < 0.001) compared to the PAF group. Patients with subsequent persistent AF showed over time significant enlargement in LA volumes (from 37.7 ml/m2 to 42.4 ml/m2, p < 0.001), lengthening of PA-TDI (from 142.2 ms to 162.2 ms, p = 0.002), and decline in LA reservoir function (from 21.9% to 18.1%, p = 0.024) after adjusting for age, gender, diabetes and LV GLS. There were no changes in LA diameter, LA conduit or booster pump function. Conversely, the PAF group showed no decline in LA function. Patients who developed persistent AF had larger LA size and impaired LA function and atrial conduction times at baseline, compared to patients who remained PAF. Over the 1-year time course of serial echocardiographic evaluation, there was progression of LA remodeling in patients who subsequently developed persistent AF, but not in patients who remained in PAF.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

2D:

Two-dimensional

AF:

Atrial fibrillation

CHA2DS2-VASc:

Acronym for congestive heart failure, hypertension, age ≥ 75 (doubled), diabetes, stroke (doubled), vascular disease, age 65–74, and sex category (female)]

ECG:

Electrocardiogram

GLS:

Global longitudinal strain

IQR:

Interquartile range

LA:

Left atrial

LV:

Left ventricular

NYHA:

New York Heart Association

PAF:

Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

PA-TDI:

Time interval between left atrial electrical and mechanical activation of the left atrium

References

  1. Kannel WB et al (1982) Epidemiologic features of chronic atrial fibrillation: the Framingham study. N Engl J Med 306(17):1018–1022

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Steinberg BA et al (2015) Higher risk of death and stroke in patients with persistent vs. paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: results from the ROCKET-AF Trial. Eur Heart J 36:288–296

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Benjamin EJ et al (1998) Impact of atrial fibrillation on the risk of death the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation 98(10):946–952

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Wang M et al (2003) Peak early diastolic mitral annulus velocity by tissue Doppler imaging adds independent and incremental prognostic value. J Am Coll Cardiol 41(5):820–826

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hart RG et al (2000) Stroke with intermittent atrial fibrillation: incidence and predictors during aspirin therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol 35(1):183–187

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hohnloser SH et al (2007) Incidence of stroke in Paroxysmal versus sustained atrial fibrillation in patients taking oral anticoagulation or combined antiplatelet therapy: an ACTIVE W substudy. J Am Coll Cardiol 50(22):2156–2161

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. van Walraven C et al (2002) Oral anticoagulants vs aspirin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: an individual patient meta-analysis. JAMA 288(19):2441–2448

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hart RG, Pearce LA, Aguilar MI (2007) Meta-analysis: antithrombotic therapy to prevent stroke in patients who have nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Ann Intern Med 146(12):857–867

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Connolly SJ et al (2009) Dabigatran versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 361(12):1139–1151

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Patel MR et al (2011) Rivaroxaban versus warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 365(10):883–891

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. de Vos CB et al (2010) Progression from paroxysmal to persistent atrial fibrillation: clinical correlates and prognosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 55(8):725–731

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Link MS et al (2017) Stroke and mortality risk in patients with various patterns of atrial fibrillation: results from the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 trial (Effective Anticoagulation With Factor Xa Next Generation in Atrial Fibrillation-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 48). Circ Arrhythmia Electrophysiol 10(1):e004267

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Steinberg BA et al (2015) Higher risk of death and stroke in patients with persistent vs. paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: results from the ROCKET-AF Trial. Eur Heart J 36(5):288–296

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Go AS et al (2018) Association of burden of atrial fibrillation with risk of ischemic stroke in adults with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: the KP-RHYTHM study. JAMA Cardiolo 3(7):601–608

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Leung M et al (2018) The impact of atrial fibrillation clinical subtype on mortality. JACC: Clin Electrophysiol 4(2):221–227

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. den Uijl DW et al (2011) Impact of left atrial fibrosis and left atrial size on the outcome of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. Heart 97(22):1847–1851

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hwang HJ et al (2009) Left atrial strain as predictor of successful outcomes in catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: a two-dimensional myocardial imaging study. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 26(2):127–132

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Yoon YE et al (2015) Echocardiographic predictors of progression to persistent or permanent atrial fibrillation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (E6P study). J Am Soc Echocardiogr 28(6):709–717

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kerr CR et al (2005) Progression to chronic atrial fibrillation after the initial diagnosis of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: results from the Canadian Registry of Atrial Fibrillation. Am Heart J 149(3):489–496

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Suzuki T et al (2011) Echocardiographic predictors of frequency of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) and its progression to persistent AF in hypertensive patients with paroxysmal AF: results from the Japanese Rhythm Management Trial II for Atrial Fibrillation (J-RHYTHM II Study). Heart Rhythm 8(12):1831–1836

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kuppahally SS et al (2010) Left atrial strain and strain rate in patients with paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation: relationship to left atrial structural remodeling detected by delayed-enhancement MRI. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 3(3):231–239

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Platonov PG et al (2011) Structural abnormalities in atrial walls are associated with presence and persistency of atrial fibrillation but not with age. J Am Coll Cardiol 58(21):2225–2232

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Teh AW et al (2012) Long-term effects of catheter ablation for lone atrial fibrillation: progressive atrial electroanatomic substrate remodeling despite successful ablation. Heart Rhythm 9(4):473–480

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Oakes RS et al (2009) Detection and quantification of left atrial structural remodeling with delayed-enhancement magnetic resonance imaging in patients with atrial fibrillation. Circulation 119(13):1758–1767

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Mueller P et al (2013) Correlation between total atrial conduction time estimated via tissue Doppler imaging (PA-TDI Interval), structural atrial remodeling and new-onset of atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 24(6):626–631

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Leung M et al (2018) Relation of echocardiographic markers of left atrial fibrosis to atrial fibrillation burden. Am J Cardiol 122(4):584–591

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Hindricks G et al (2020) 2020 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS): the task force for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) developed with the special contribution of the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) of the ESC. Eur Heart J 42(5):373–498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Camm AJ et al (2010) Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation: the task force for the management of atrial fibrillation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 31(19):2369–2429

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Lip GY et al (2010) Refining clinical risk stratification for predicting stroke and thromboembolism in atrial fibrillation using a novel risk factor-based approach: the euro heart survey on atrial fibrillation. Chest J 137(2):263–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Lang RM et al (2015) Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American society of echocardiography and the European association of cardiovascular imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 28(1):1–39

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Mor-Avi V et al (2011) Current and evolving echocardiographic techniques for the quantitative evaluation of cardiac mechanics: ASE/EAE consensus statement on methodology and indications endorsed by the Japanese Society of Echocardiography. Eur J Echocardiogr 12(3):167–205

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Malavasi VL et al (2021) Atrial fibrillation pattern and factors affecting the progression to permanent atrial fibrillation. Intern Emerg Med 16:1131–1140

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Pillarisetti J et al (2009) Evolution of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation to persistent or permanent atrial fibrillation: predictors of progression. J Atrial Fibrillation 2(1):388–394

    Google Scholar 

  34. Su H-M et al (2013) Global left ventricular longitudinal systolic strain as a major predictor of cardiovascular events in patients with atrial fibrillation. Heart 99(21):1588–1596

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Parkash R et al (2004) The association of left atrial size and occurrence of atrial fibrillation: a prospective cohort study from the Canadian Registry of Atrial Fibrillation. Am Heart J 148(4):649–654

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Leung M et al (2018) Assessing Atrial Function. In: Nihoyannopoulos P, Kisslo J (eds) Echocardiography. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 661–681

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  37. Shinagawa K et al (2002) Dynamic nature of atrial fibrillation substrate during development and reversal of heart failure in dogs. Circulation 105(22):2672–2678

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Nattel S, Burstein B, Dobrev D (2008) Atrial remodeling and atrial fibrillation: mechanisms and implications. Circ Arrhythmia Electrophysiol 1(1):62–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Kainuma S et al (2011) Advanced left-atrial fibrosis is associated with unsuccessful maze operation for valvular atrial fibrillation. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 40(1):61–69

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Wang TJ et al (2003) Temporal relations of atrial fibrillation and congestive heart failure and their joint influence on mortality: the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation 107(23):2920–2925

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Botto GL et al (2009) Presence and duration of atrial fibrillation detected by continuous monitoring: crucial implications for the risk of thromboembolic events. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 20(3):241–248

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Deng H et al (2017) Clinical scores for outcomes of rhythm control or arrhythmia progression in patients with atrial fibrillation: a systematic review. Clin Res Cardiol 106:813–823

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Cosedis Nielsen J et al (2012) Radiofrequency ablation as initial therapy in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 367(17):1587–1595

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Calkins H et al (2012) 2012 HRS/EHRA/ECAS expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation: recommendations for patient selection, procedural techniques, patient management and follow-up, definitions, endpoints, and research trial design: a report of the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) Task Force on Catheter and Surgical Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation. Developed in partnership with the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA), a registered branch of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Cardiac Arrhythmia Society (ECAS); and in collaboration with the American College of Cardiology (ACC), American Heart Association (AHA), the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS), and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS). Endorsed by the governing bodies of the American College of Cardiology Foundation, the American Heart Association, the European Cardiac Arrhythmia Society, the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Society of Thoracic Surgeons, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, and the Heart Rhythm Society. Heart Rhythm 9(4):632-696.e21

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Bollmann A (2007) Pulmonary venous flow assessed by Doppler echocardiography in the management of atrial fibrillation. Echocardiography 24(4):430–435

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors have not disclosed any funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

ML: Conception and design of the study; collection, analysis and interpretation of data; drafting of the manuscript; final approval of the manuscript. PJvanR Conception and design of the study; collection, analysis and interpretation of data; final approval of the manuscript. MVR Collection, analysis and interpretation of data; final approval of the manuscript. SE van W Collection, analysis and interpretation of data; final approval of the manuscript. NAM Conception and design of the study; collection, analysis and interpretation of data; final approval of the manuscript. DYL Conception and design of the study; drafting of the manuscript; final approval of the manuscript. VD Conception and design of the study; collection, analysis and interpretation of data; drafting of the manuscript; final approval of the manuscript. A CT N Interpretation of data; drafting of the manuscript; final approval of the manuscript. JJB Conception and design of the study; collection, analysis and interpretation of data; drafting of the manuscript; final approval of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Melissa Leung.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The Department of Cardiology, LUMC, received research grants from Medtronic, Biotronik, Boston Scientific and Edwards Lifesciences. VD received speaker fees from Abbott Vascular. JJB received speaker fees from Abbott and Edwards Lifesciences.

Ethical approval

The Institutional Review Board approved this retrospective analysis of clinically acquired data and waived the need for patient written informed consent.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Leung, M., van Rosendael, P.J., van der Bijl, P. et al. The value of serial echocardiography in risk assessment of patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 40, 499–508 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-023-03014-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-023-03014-6

Keywords

Navigation