Abstract
Both interatrial block (IAB) and left atrium (LA) strain are associated with atrial arrhythmias in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients, but the relationship between IAB and LA strain has not yet been reported. This study was to investigate the correlation between LA strain and IAB in STEMI patients. This is a single-center retrospective clinical observational study. The STEMI patients with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) were enrolled, and all patients completed cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR). A standard 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) was recorded on the same day as CMR. IAB was measured by p duration on ECG at follow-up. 302 patients were enrolled, including 91 (30.1%) with IAB. The reservoir strain, conduit strain and booster strain were included in model 1, model 2 and model 3, respectively. In model 1, age (OR 1.025; 95%CI 1.003–1.047; p = 0.026), hypertension (OR 2.188; 95%CI 1.288–3.719; p = 0.004), and reservoir strain (OR 0.947; 95%CI 0.920–0.974; p < 0.001) were independent factors for IAB. In model 2, age (OR 1.031; 95%CI 1.009–1.053; p = 0.006), hypertension (OR 2.058; 95%CI 1.202–3.522; p = 0.008), RCA lesions (OR 1.797; 95%CI 1.036–3.113; p = 0.037), and conduit strain (OR 0.910; 95%CI 0.868–0.953; p < 0.001) were independent factors for IAB. In model 3, age (OR 1.022; 95%CI 1.001–1.045; p = 0.044), hypertension (OR 2.239; 95%CI 1.329–3.773; p = 0.002), and booster strain (OR 0.948; 95%CI 0.908–0.991; p = 0.019) were independent factors for IAB. With the lowest AIC and BIC values, model 2 was the best-fit model. LA strain associated with IAB in STEMI patients. The model including conduit strain was the best-fit one.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available by request.
References
Li S, Gao X, Yang J, Xu H, Wang Y, Zhao Y et al (2022) Number of standard modifiable risk factors and mortality in patients with first-presentation ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: insights from China acute myocardial infarction registry. BMC Med 20:217. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-022-02418-w
Schmitt J, Duray G, Gersh BJ, Hohnloser SH (2009) Atrial fibrillation in acute myocardial infarction: a systematic review of the incidence, clinical features and prognostic implications. Eur Heart J 30:1038–1045. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehn579
Rathore SS, Berger AK, Weinfurt KP, Schulman KA, Oetgen WJ, Gersh BJ et al (2000) Acute myocardial infarction complicated by atrial fibrillation in the elderly: prevalence and outcomes. Circulation 101:969–974. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.101.9.969
Kottkamp H (2013) Human atrial fibrillation substrate: towards a specific fibrotic atrial cardiomyopathy. Eur Heart J 34:2731–2738. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/eht194
Power DA, Lampert J, Camaj A, Bienstock SW, Kocovic N, Bayes-Genis A et al (2022) Cardiovascular complications of interatrial conduction block: JACC State-of-the-art review. J Am Coll Cardiol 79:1199–1211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2022.01.030
Escobar-Robledo LA, Bayés-de-Luna A, Lupón J, Baranchuk A, Moliner P, Martínez-Sellés M et al (2018) Advanced interatrial block predicts new-onset atrial fibrillation and ischemic stroke in patients with heart failure: the Bayes’ syndrome-HF study. Int J Cardiol 271:174–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.05.050
Baranchuk A, Torner P, de Luna AB (2018) Bayés syndrome: what is it. Circulation 137:200–202. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.032333
Kovács A, Oláh A, Lux Á, Mátyás C, Németh BT, Kellermayer D et al (2015) Strain and strain rate by speckle-tracking echocardiography correlate with pressure-volume loop-derived contractility indices in a rat model of athlete’s heart. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 308:H743–H748. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.00828.2014
Gan G, Ferkh A, Boyd A, Thomas L (2018) Left atrial function: evaluation by strain analysis. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther 8:29–46. https://doi.org/10.21037/cdt.2017.06.08
Singh A, Medvedofsky D, Mediratta A, Balaney B, Kruse E, Ciszek B et al (2019) Peak left atrial strain as a single measure for the non-invasive assessment of left ventricular filling pressures. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 35:23–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-018-1425-y
Habibi M, Lima J, Gucuk Ipek E, Zimmerman SL, Zipunnikov V, Spragg D et al (2016) The association of baseline left atrial structure and function measured with cardiac magnetic resonance and pulmonary vein isolation outcome in patients with drug-refractory atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm 13:1037–1044. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2016.01.016
Khurram IM, Habibi M, Gucuk Ipek E, Chrispin J, Yang E, Fukumoto K et al (2016) Left atrial LGE and arrhythmia recurrence following pulmonary vein isolation for paroxysmal and persistent AF. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 9:142–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2015.10.015
Dogdus M, Dindas F, Akhan O, Yenercag M, Yildirim A, Abacioglu OO et al (2021) Impaired left atrial strain in the presence of interatrial block in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 37:2127–2134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-021-02278-0
Maceira AM, Cosín-Sales J, Roughton M, Prasad SK, Pennell DJ (2010) Reference left atrial dimensions and volumes by steady state free precession cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 12:65. https://doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-12-65
Kawel-Boehm N, Hetzel SJ, Ambale-Venkatesh B, Captur G, Francois CJ, Jerosch-Herold M et al (2020) Reference ranges (normal values) for cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) in adults and children: 2020 update. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 22:87. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12968-020-00683-3
Çinier G, Tekkeşin Aİ, Genç D, Yıldız U, Parsova E, Pay L et al (2018) Interatrial block as a predictor of atrial fibrillation in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Clin Cardiol 41:1232–1237. https://doi.org/10.1002/clc.23029
Busquet J, Fontan F, Anderson RH, Ho SY, Davies MJ (1984) The surgical significance of the atrial branches of the coronary arteries. Int J Cardiol 6:223–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-5273(84)90357-7
Martínez-Sellés M, Massó-van Roessel A, Álvarez-García J, de la García B, Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Vidán MT et al (2016) Interatrial block and atrial arrhythmias in centenarians: prevalence, associations, and clinical implications. Heart Rhythm 13:645–651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2015.10.034
Cotter PE, Martin PJ, Pugh PJ, Warburton EA, Cheriyan J, Belham M (2011) Increased incidence of interatrial block in younger adults with cryptogenic stroke and patent foramen ovale. Cerebrovasc Dis Extra 1:36–43. https://doi.org/10.1159/000327346
Alexander B, MacHaalany J, Lam B, van Rooy H, Haseeb S, Kuchtaruk A et al (2017) Comparison of the extent of coronary artery disease in patients with versus without interatrial block and implications for new-onset atrial fibrillation. Am J Cardiol 119:1162–1165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.12.032
Bernal E, Bayés-Genís A, Ariza-Solé A, Formiga F, Vidán MT, Escobar-Robledo LA et al (2018) Interatrial block, frailty and prognosis in elderly patients with myocardial infarction. J Electrocardiol 51:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2017.08.026
Ninios I, Pliakos C, Ninios V, Karvounis H, Louridas G (2007) Prevalence of interatrial block in a general population of elderly people. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol 12:298–300. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1542-474X.2007.00178.x
DiDio LJ, Lopes AC, Caetano AC, Prates JC (1995) Variations of the origin of the artery of the sinoatrial node in normal human hearts. Surg Radiol Anat 17:19–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01629494
Álvarez-García J, Vives-Borrás M, Gomis P, Ordoñez-Llanos J, Ferrero-Gregori A, Serra-Peñaranda A et al (2016) Electrophysiological effects of selective atrial coronary artery occlusion in humans. Circulation 133:2235–2242. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.021700
Cameli M, Mandoli GE, Loiacono F, Sparla S, Iardino E, Mondillo S (2016) Left atrial strain: a useful index in atrial fibrillation. Int J Cardiol 220:208–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.06.197
Ersbøll M, Andersen MJ, Valeur N, Mogensen UM, Waziri H, Møller JE et al (2013) The prognostic value of left atrial peak reservoir strain in acute myocardial infarction is dependent on left ventricular longitudinal function and left atrial size. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 6:26–33. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.112.978296
Burstein B, Nattel S (2008) Atrial fibrosis: mechanisms and clinical relevance in atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol 51:802–809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2007.09.064
Bertelsen L, Diederichsen SZ, Haugan KJ, Brandes A, Graff C, Krieger D et al (2020) Left atrial late gadolinium enhancement is associated with incident atrial fibrillation as detected by continuous monitoring with implantable loop recorders. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 13:1690–1700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2020.03.024
Lee SP, Lee W, Lee JM, Park EA, Kim HK, Kim YJ et al (2015) Assessment of diffuse myocardial fibrosis by using MR imaging in asymptomatic patients with aortic stenosis. Radiology 274:359–369. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.14141120
Imai M, Ambale Venkatesh B, Samiei S, Donekal S, Habibi M, Armstrong AC et al (2014) Multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis: association between left atrial function using tissue tracking from cine MR imaging and myocardial fibrosis. Radiology 273:703–713. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.14131971
Longobardo L, Todaro MC, Zito C, Piccione MC, Di Bella G, Oreto L et al (2014) Role of imaging in assessment of atrial fibrosis in patients with atrial fibrillation: state-of-the-art review. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 15:1–5. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jet116
DeSanctis RW, Block P, Hutter AM Jr (1972) Tachyarrhythmias in myocardial infarction. Circulation 45:681–702. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.45.3.681
Gorcsan J (2021) Can left atrial strain forecast future fibrillation. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 14:145–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2020.09.012
Kim J, Yum B, Palumbo MC, Sultana R, Wright N, Das M et al (2020) Left atrial strain impairment precedes geometric remodeling as a marker of post-myocardial infarction diastolic dysfunction. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 13:2099–2113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2020.05.041
Leng S, Ge H, He J, Kong L, Yang Y, Yan F et al (2020) Long-term prognostic value of cardiac MRI left atrial strain in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Radiology 296:299–309. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2020200176
Funding
The authors have not disclosed any funding.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
LC and DZ performed this study and wrote the manuscript. CS and LC analyzed the CMR imaging. YW and YR were involved in data collection. YL directed the entire research work and corrected the articles. All authors read and approve the manuscript and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the research in ensuring that the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work is appropriately investigated and resolved.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the study was conducted without any commercial or financial relationships construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
The study was reviewed by the Ethics Committee of the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Chen, L., Zhang, D., Sang, C. et al. Left atrial strain associated with interatrial block in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 40, 477–485 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-023-03011-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-023-03011-9