Skip to main content
Log in

Reasons for disagreement between screening and standard echocardiography in primary care: data from the PROVAR + study

Disagreement between screening and standard echo

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We aimed to evaluate the reasons for disagreement between screening echocardiography (echo), acquired by nonexperts, and standard echo in the Brazilian primary care (PC). Over 20 months, 22 PC workers were trained on simplified handheld (GE VSCAN) echo protocols. Screening groups, consisting of patients aged 17-20, 35-40 and 60-65 years, and patients referred for clinical indications underwent focused echo. Studies were remotelyinterpreted in US and Brazil, and those diagnosed with major or severe HD were referred for standard echoperformed by an expert. Major HD was defined as moderate to severe valve disease, ventriculardysfunction/hypertrophy, pericardial effusion or wall-motion abnormalities. A random sample of exams wasselected for evaluation of variables accounting for disagreement. A sample of 768 patients was analyzed, 651(85%) in the referred group. Quality issues were reported in 5.8%, and the random Kappa for major HD between screening and standard echo was 0.51. The most frequent reasons for disagreement were: overestimation of mitral regurgitation (MR) (17.9%, N=138), left ventricular (LV) dysfunction (15.7%, N=121), aortic regurgitation (AR) (15.2%, N=117), LV hypertrophy (13.5%, N=104) and tricuspid regurgitation (12.7%, N=98). Misdiagnosis of mitral and aortic morphological abnormalities was observed in 12.4% and 3.0%, and underestimation of AR and MR occurred in 4.6% and 11.1%. Among 257 patients with suspected mild/moderate MR, 129 were reclassified to normal. In conclusion, although screening echo with task-shifting in PC is a promising tool in low-income areas, estimation of valve regurgitation and LV function and size account for considerable disagreement with standard exams.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data analytic methods and study materials will be made available to other researchers for purposes of reproducing the results or replicating the procedure, from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Oliveira GMM, Brant LCC, Polanczyk CA, Biolo A, Nascimento BR, Malta DC, Souza MFM, Soares GP, Xavier Junior GF, Machline-Carrion MJ, Bittencourt MS, Pontes Neto OM, Silvestre OM, Teixeira RA, Sampaio RO, Gaziano TA (2020) Roth GA and Ribeiro ALP. Cardiovascular Statistics - Brazil 2020. Arq Bras Cardiol 115:308–439

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Stevens B, Pezzullo L, Verdian L, Tomlinson J, George A, Bacal F (2018) The Economic Burden of Heart Conditions in Brazil. Arq Bras Cardiol 111:29–36

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Capotosto L, Massoni F, De Sio S, Ricci S, Vitarelli A (2018) Early diagnosis of Cardiovascular Diseases in Workers: Role of Standard and Advanced Echocardiography. Biomed Res Int 2018:7354691

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Nilsson G, Soderstrom L, Alverlind K, Samuelsson E, Mooe T (2019) Hand-held cardiac ultrasound examinations performed in primary care patients by nonexperts to identify reduced ejection fraction. BMC Med Educ 19:282

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Ramm C, Carter P, Goins A, Centeno R, Wofford R, Stewart J, Kurz J, Vavalle J (2019) Handheld Echocardiography by Primary Care Physicians to screen for Valvular Heart Disease: a pilot study. J Am Coll Cardiol 73:2007–2007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Nascimento BR, Beaton AZ, Nunes MCP, Tompsett AR, Oliveira KKB, Diamantino AC, Barbosa MM, Lourenco TV, Teixeira IM, Ruiz GZL, Rios JPP, Ribeiro ALP (2019) Sable C and investigators P. Integration of echocardiographic screening by non-physicians with remote reading in primary care. Heart 105:283–290

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Alkmim MB, Figueira RM, Marcolino MS, Cardoso CS, Pena de Abreu M, Cunha LR, da Cunha DF, Antunes AP, Resende AG, Resende ES, Ribeiro AL (2012) Improving patient access to specialized health care: the Telehealth Network of Minas Gerais, Brazil. Bull World Health Organ 90:373–378

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) Guidelines. ASE Guidelines (2018) ;2018

  9. Singh S, Bansal M, Maheshwari P, Adams D, Sengupta SP, Price R, Dantin L, Smith M, Kasliwal RR, Pellikka PA, Thomas JD, Narula J, Sengupta PP, Investigators A-RS (2013) American Society of Echocardiography: Remote Echocardiography with web-based assessments for referrals at a Distance (ASE-REWARD) study. J Am Soc Echocardiography: official publication Am Soc Echocardiography 26:221–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lopes EL, Beaton AZ, Nascimento BR, Tompsett A, Dos Santos JP, Perlman L, Diamantino AC, Oliveira KK, Oliveira CM, Nunes MD, Bonisson L, Ribeiro AL (2016) Sable C and Programa de Rastreament OdVRi. Telehealth solutions to enable global collaboration in rheumatic heart disease screening.J Telemed Telecare.

  11. Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG (2009) Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform 42:377–381

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Nascimento BR, Sable C, Nunes MCP, Oliveira KKB, Franco J, Barbosa MM, Reese AT, Diamantino AC, Ferreira Filho DSG, Macedo FVB, Raso LAM, Paiva SMW, Ribeiro ALP, Beaton AZ (2021) Echocardiographic screening of pregnant women by non-physicians with remote interpretation in primary care. Fam Pract 38:225–230

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Jenkins S, Alabed S, Swift A, Marques G, Ryding A, Sawh C, Wardley J, Shah BN, Swoboda P, Senior R, Nijveldt R, Vassiliou VS, Garg P (2021) Diagnostic accuracy of handheld cardiac ultrasound device for assessment of left ventricular structure and function: systematic review and meta-analysis. Heart 107:1826–1834

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Chamsi-Pasha MA, Sengupta PP, Zoghbi WA (2017) Handheld Echocardiography: current state and future perspectives. Circulation 136:2178–2188

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ruddox V, Norum IB, Stokke TM, Edvardsen T, Otterstad JE (2017) Focused cardiac ultrasound by unselected residents-the challenges. BMC Med Imaging 17:22

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Mjolstad OC, Andersen GN, Dalen H, Graven T, Skjetne K, Kleinau JO, Haugen BO (2013) Feasibility and reliability of point-of-care pocket-size echocardiography performed by medical residents. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 14:1195–1202

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Prinz C, Dohrmann J, van Buuren F, Bitter T, Bogunovic N, Horstkotte D, Faber L (2012) The importance of training in echocardiography: a validation study using pocket echocardiography. J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown) 13:700–707

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lucas BP, Candotti C, Margeta B, Evans AT, Mba B, Baru J, Asbury JK, Asmar A, Kumapley R, Patel M, Borkowsky S, Fung S, Charles-Damte M (2009) Diagnostic accuracy of hospitalist-performed hand-carried ultrasound echocardiography after a brief training program. J Hosp Med 4:340–349

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Andersen GN, Haugen BO, Graven T, Salvesen O, Mjolstad OC, Dalen H (2011) Feasibility and reliability of point-of-care pocket-sized echocardiography. Eur J Echocardiogr 12:665–670

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Andersen GN, Viset A, Mjolstad OC, Salvesen O, Dalen H, Haugen BO (2014) Feasibility and accuracy of point-of-care pocket-size ultrasonography performed by medical students. BMC Med Educ 14:156

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Pathan F, Fonseca R, Marwick TH (2016) Usefulness of hand-held Ultrasonography as a gatekeeper to Standard Echocardiography for “Rarely Appropriate” Echocardiography requests. Am J Cardiol 118:1588–1592

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Nascimento BR, Sable C, Nunes MCP, Diamantino AC, Oliveira KKB, Oliveira CM, Meira ZMA, Castilho SRT, Santos JPA, Rabelo LMM, Lauriano KCA, Carmo GAL, Tompsett A, Ribeiro ALP (2018) Beaton AZ and Investigators P. Comparison between different strategies of Rheumatic Heart Disease echocardiographic screening in Brazil: Data from the PROVAR (rheumatic valve Disease Screening Program) Study.Journal of the American Heart Association. ; 7

  23. Narula S, Shameer K, Salem Omar AM, Dudley JT, Sengupta PP (2016) Machine-learning algorithms to automate morphological and functional assessments in 2D Echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 68:2287–2295

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Narang A, Bae R, Hong H, Thomas Y, Surette S, Cadieu C, Chaudhry A, Martin RP, McCarthy PM, Rubenson DS, Goldstein S, Little SH, Lang RM, Weissman NJ, Thomas JD (2021) Utility of a deep-learning algorithm to Guide Novices to acquire Echocardiograms for Limited Diagnostic Use. JAMA Cardiol 6:624–632

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Martins J, Nascimento ER, Nascimento BR, Sable CA, Beaton AZ, Ribeiro AL, Meira W, Pappa GL (2021) Towards automatic diagnosis of rheumatic heart disease on echocardiographic exams through video-based deep learning. J Am Med Inform Assoc 28:1834–1842

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Beaton A, Nascimento BR, Diamantino AC, Pereira GT, Lopes EL, Miri CO, Bruno KK, Chequer G, Ferreira CG, Lafeta LC, Richards H, Perlman L, Webb CL, Ribeiro AL, Sable C, Nunes Mdo C (2016) Efficacy of a standardized computer-based training curriculum to teach echocardiographic identification of Rheumatic Heart Disease to Nonexpert users. Am J Cardiol 117:1783–1789

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Lopes EL, Beaton AZ, Nascimento BR, Tompsett A, Dos Santos JP, Perlman L, Diamantino AC, Oliveira KK, Oliveira CM, Nunes M, Bonisson L, Ribeiro AL (2018) Sable C and Programa de Rastreament OdVRi. Telehealth solutions to enable global collaboration in rheumatic heart disease screening. J Telemed Telecare 24:101–109

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Otto CM (2019) Heartbeat: Telemedicine for echocardiography screening. Heart 105:261–263

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Seetharam K, Kagiyama N, Sengupta PP (2019) Application of mobile health, telemedicine and artificial intelligence to echocardiography. Echo Res Pract 6:R41–R52

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Tiver KD, Horsfall M, Swan A, De Pasquale C, Horsfall E, Chew DP, De Pasquale CG (2022) Accuracy of highly limited echocardiographic screening images for determining a structurally normal heart: the quick-six study. Heart Lung Circ 31:462–468

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Francis JR, Whalley GA, Kaethner A, Fairhurst H, Hardefeldt H, Reeves B, Auld B, Marangou J, Horton A, Wheaton G, Robertson T, Ryan C, Brown S, Smith G, Dos Santos J, Flavio R, Embaum K, da Graca Noronha M, Lopes Belo S, Madeira Santos C, Georginha Dos Santos M, Cabral J, do, Rosario I, Harries J, Francis LA, Draper ADK, James CL, Davis K, Yan J, Mitchell A, da Silva Almeida I, Engelman D, Roberts KV (2021) Ralph AP and Remenyi B. Single-View Echocardiography by Nonexpert Practitioners to Detect Rheumatic Heart Disease: A Prospective Study of Diagnostic Accuracy. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. ;14:e011790

  32. Telford LH, Abdullahi LH, Ochodo EA, Zuhlke LJ, Engel ME (2020) Standard echocardiography versus handheld echocardiography for the detection of subclinical rheumatic heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy. BMJ open 10:e038449

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Diamantino AC, Nascimento BR, Nunes MCP, Sable CA, Oliveira KKB, Rabelo LC, Franco J, Diamantino LC, Barbosa MM, Reese AT, Olivieri L, de Lima EM, Martins LNA, Colosimo EA, Beaton AZ (2020) Ribeiro ALP and investigators P. Impact of incorporating echocardiographic screening into a clinical prediction model to optimise utilisation of echocardiography in primary care.Int J Clin Pract. :e13686

  34. Voleti S, Okello E, Murali M, Sarnacki R, Majwala A, Ssembatya R, Bakka O, Namisanvu H, Njeri A, Matovu A, DeStigter K, Sable C, Beaton A (2020) The personal and clinical impact of screen-detected maternal rheumatic heart disease in Uganda: a prospective follow up study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 20:611

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Waweru-Siika W, Barasa A, Wachira B, Nekyon D, Karau B, Juma F, Wanjiku G, Otieno H, Bloomfield GS, Sloth E (2020) Building focused cardiac ultrasound capacity in a lower middle-income country: a single centre study to assess training impact. Afr J Emerg Med 10:136–143

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Stewart KA, Navarro SM, Kambala S, Tan G, Poondla R, Lederman S, Barbour K, Lavy C (2020) Trends in Ultrasound Use in Low and Middle Income Countries: a systematic review. Int J MCH AIDS 9:103–120

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The PROVAR + investigators would like to thank Edwards Lifesciences Foundation® for supporting and funding the primary care screening program (PROVAR+) in Brazil, General Electric Healthcare® for providing echocardiography equipment and WiRed Health Resources for providing online curriculum on heart disease and echocardiography. The Telehealth Network of Minas Gerais was funded by the State Government of Minas Gerais, by its Health Department (Secretaria de Estado da Saúde de Minas Gerais) and FAPEMIG (Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa de Minas Gerais), and by the Brazilian Government, including the Health Ministry and the Science and Technology Ministry and its research and innovation agencies, CNPq (Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico) and FINEP (Financiadora de Estudos e Projetos). Dr Ribeiro is supported in part by CNPq (310790/2021-2 and 465518/2014-1) and by FAPEMIG (PPM-00428-17 and RED-00081-16. Dr Nascimento is partially financed CNPq (Bolsa de produtividade em pesquisa, 312382/2019-7), by the Edwards Lifesciences Foundation (Improving the Prevention and Detection of Heart Valve Disease Across the Lifespan, 2022) and by FAPEMIG (grant APQ-000627-20). Medical students received scholarships from the National Institute of Science and Technology for Health Technology Assessment (IATS, project: 465518/2014-1). This study was funded by Edwards Lifesciences Foundation, USA, and FAPEMIG, Brazil. The funder did not have any relationship with the conduct of the study, data collection, analysis, and interpretation, and the preparation, review, or approval of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Contributions

Conception and design of the research: Galdino BF, Nascimento BR, Nunes, MCP; Acquisition of data: Oliveira KKB, Franco J, Galdino, BF, Barbosa MM, Nunes, MCP, Amaral, AM, Santos, LPA, Nogueira, MAA, Rocha, RTL, Silva, VRH; Analysis and interpretation of data: Nascimento BR, Nunes MCP, Beaton AZ, Reese AT, Sable C; Statistical analysis: Nascimento BR; Funding acquisition: Sable C, Beaton AZ, Nascimento BR; Writing of the manuscript: Nascimento, BR, Galdino, BF, Amaral, AM, Santos, LPA, Nogueira, MAA, Rocha, RTL, Silva, VRH; Critical revision of the manuscript for intellectual content: Nascimento BR, Ribeiro, ALP, Sable C, Beaton AZ; Authors responsible for the overall content as guarantors: Nascimento, BR, Nunes, MCP.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bruno R. Nascimento.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare regarding this manuscript.

Ethics approval

was obtained from the Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais Institutional Review Board and the Belo Horizonte City Board of Health, and all patients included in this analysis signed an informed consent form prior to enrollment.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The abstract with partial results of this work was presented at the American Heart Association Scientific Sessions, November 16 to 18, 2019, in Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Galdino, B.F., Amaral, A.M., Santos, L.P.A. et al. Reasons for disagreement between screening and standard echocardiography in primary care: data from the PROVAR + study. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 39, 929–937 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-023-02800-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-023-02800-6

Keywords

Navigation