Skip to main content
Log in

The value of CMR Left ventricular strain analysis in evaluating ICM

  • OriginalPaper
  • Published:
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to investigate the value of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) derived left ventricular strain parameters in evaluation of ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM). Thirty-one ICM patients and nineteen non-cardiomyopathy (non-CM) patients who performed CMR examinations during the same period were selected for this retrospective study. The basic clinical data, CMR left ventricular function parameters, left ventricular strain parameters were compared among the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) preserved ICM group, the LVEF impaired ICM group and the non-CM group. The differences of MyoGCS (-21.9 ± 1.9 vs. -18.9 ± 2.7 P<0.001), MyoGLS (-20.8 ± 2.3 vs. -17.0 ± 2.9 P<0.001) and EndoGLS (-22.2 ± 3.1 vs. -17.6 ± 3.7 P<0.001) between LVEF preserved ICM group and non-CM group were statistically significant, while the differences of left heart function parameters between the two groups were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). The left ventricular strain analysis can be used to assess cardiac functional and morphological alterations in ICM patients prior to changes of left ventricular function parameters, which has high clinical significance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nowbar AN, Gitto M, Howard JP et al (2019) Mortality From Ischemic Heart Disease. Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes 12(6):e005375. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.118.005375

  2. Nowbar AN, Howard JP, Finegold JA et al (2014) 2014 global geographic analysis of mortality from ischaemic heart disease by country, age and income: statistics from World Health Organisation and United Nations. Int J Cardiol 174:293–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.04.096

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Sirajuddin A, Mirmomen S, Mojdeh, Kligerman Seth J et al (2021) Ischemic heart disease: noninvasive imaging techniques and findings. Radiographics:a Rev publication Radiological Soc North Am 41:990–1021. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.2021200125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sokolska Justyna M, von Spiczak J, Gotschy A et al (2019) Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging to detect ischemia in chronic coronary syndromes: state of the art. Kardiol Pol 77(12):1123–1133. https://doi.org/10.33963/KP.15057

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Smiseth OA, Torp H, Opdahl A et al (2016) Myocardial strain imaging: how useful is it in clinical decision making? Eur Heart J 37:1196–1207. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehv529

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kwong RY, Ge Y, Steel K et al(2019)Cardiac magnetic resonance stress perfusion imaging for evaluation of patients with chest pain.JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY74:1741–1755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2019.07.074

  7. Dweck MR, Williams MC, Moss AJ et al (2016)computed tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance in ischemic heart disease.Journal of the American College of Cardiology68:2201–2216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2016.08.047

  8. Pedrizzetti G, Lapinskas T, Tonti G et al (2019) The relationship between EF and strain permits a more accurate assessment of LV systolic function. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 12:1893–1895. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2019.03.019

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ge J, Xu Y, Chen Wang (2019) Internal Medicine. People’s Medical Publishing House, China

    Google Scholar 

  10. GBD 2019 Demographics Collaborators(2020)global age-sex-specific fertility, mortality, healthy life expectancy (HALE), and population estimates in 204 countries and territories, 1950–2019: a comprehensive demographic analysis for the global burden of Disease Study 2019.Lancet396(10258):1160–1203. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30977-6

  11. Hochman JS, Reynolds HR, Bangalore S et al(2019)baseline characteristics and risk profiles of participants in the ISCHEMIA Randomized clinical trial.JAMA Cardiol4(3):273–286. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamacardio.2019.0014

  12. Brainin P, Holm AE, Sengeløv M, et al(2021)the prognostic value of myocardial deformational patterns on all-cause mortality is modified by ischemic cardiomyopathy in patients with heart failure.Int J Cardiovasc Imaging37:3137–3144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-021-02291-3

  13. Andre F, Steen H, Matheis P et al (2015) Age- and gender-related normal left ventricular deformation assessed by cardiovascular magnetic resonance feature tracking. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 17(1):25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12968-015-0123-3

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Zorach B, Shaw Peter W, Bourque J et al(2018)quantitative cardiovascular magnetic resonance perfusion imaging identifies reduced flow reserve in microvascular coronary artery disease.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance20:14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12968-018-0435-1

  15. Tanacli R, Hashemi D, Lapinskas T et al (2019) Range variability in CMR feature tracking multilayer strain across different stages of heart failure. Sci Rep 9:16478. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-52683-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Krum H, Abraham WT (2009) Heart failure. Lancet 373:941–955. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60236-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Stillman AE, Oudkerk M, Bluemke DA et al(2018)imaging the myocardial ischemic cascade.Int J Cardiovasc Imaging34:1249–1263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-018-1330-4

  18. Konstam MA, Abboud FM (2017) Ejection fraction: misunderstood and overrated (changing the paradigm in categorizing heart failure). Circulation 135:717–719. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.025795

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Ha Q, Vo TH, Marwick K Negishi (2018) MRI-Derived myocardial strain measures in normal subjects. JACC: Cardiovasc Imaging 11:196–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2016.12.025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Foley JRJ, Swoboda PP, Fent GJ et al (2018) Quantitative deformation analysis differentiates ischaemic and non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy: sub-group analysis of the VINDICATE trial. Eur Heart J-Cardiovasc Imaging 19(7):816–823. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jex235

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Onishi T, Saha SK, Delgado-Montero A et al (2015) Global longitudinal strain and global circumferential strain by speckle-tracking echocardiography and feature-tracking cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: comparison with left ventricular ejection fraction. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 28:587–596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2014.11.018

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Knuuti J, Wijns W, Saraste A et al (2020) 2019 ESC guidelines on the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes: the task force for diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes of the european society of cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 41:407–477. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehz425

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Siontis GC, Mavridis D, Greenwood JP, et al(2018)outcomes of non-invasive diagnostic modalities for the detection of coronary artery disease: network meta-analysis of diagnostic randomised controlled trials.BMJ360:k452. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k504

  24. Panagiotis A, Ge Y, Steel K et al (2020) Evaluation of stress Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in risk reclassification of patients with suspected coronary artery disease. JAMA Cardiol 5(12):1401–1409. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamacardio.2020.2834

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Nagel E, Greenwood JP, McCann GP, et al(2019)magnetic resonance perfusion or fractional flow reserve in coronary disease.N ENGL J Med380:2418–2428. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1716734

  26. Shaw LJ, Berman DS, Picard MH et al (2014) Comparative definitions for moderate-severe ischemia in stress nuclear, echocardiography, and magnetic resonance imaging. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 7(6):593–604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2013.10.021

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. DeVore AD, McNulty S, Alenezi F et al (2017) Impaired left ventricular global longitudinal strain in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: insights from the RELAX trial. Eur J Heart Fail 19:893–900. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.754

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Cikes M, Solomon SD (2016) Beyond ejection fraction: an integrative approach for assessment of cardiac structure and function in heart failure. Eur Heart J 37(21):1642–1650. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehv510

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kraigher-Krainer E, Shah AM, Gupta DK et al (2014) Impaired systolic function by strain imaging in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. J Am Coll Cardiol 63:447–456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2013.09.052

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Adachi H, Asanuma T, Masuda K et al(2020)deterioration of longitudinal, circumferential, and radial myocardial strains during acute coronary flow reduction: which direction of strain should be analyzed for early detection?Int J Cardiovasc Imaging36:1725–1735. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-020-01888-4

  31. Sengeløv M, Jørgensen PG, Jensen JS et al (2015) Global longitudinal strain is a Superior Predictor of all-cause mortality in Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 8:1351–1359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2015.07.013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Riffel JH, Keller MGP, Rost F et al (2016) Left ventricular long axis strain: a new prognosticator in non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy? J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 18:36. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12968-016-0255-0

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Asanuma T, Nakatani S (2015) Myocardial ischaemia and post-systolic shortening. https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2013-305403. Heart

  34. Barreiro-Pérez M, Curione D, Symons R et al(2018)left ventricular global myocardial strain assessment comparing the reproducibility of four commercially available CMR-feature tracking algorithms.European radiology28:5137–5147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5538-4

  35. Mirea O, Pagourelias ED, Duchenne J et al (2018) Variability and reproducibility of segmental longitudinal strain measurement: a report from the EACVI-ASE strain standardization task force. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 11:15–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2017.01.027

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by Houning Zhang, Jiaxi Sheng, Guoce Li, Fenghai Liu, Hao Bian and Xiqing Niu. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Houning Zhang and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. The manuscript was reviewed by Liqing Kang. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Liqing Kang.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Ethics approval

This study was a retrospective study and was approved by the ethics committee of our hospital and exempted from informed consent.

Consent to publish

All authors have provided consent to publish the manuscript.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, H., Sheng, J., Li, G. et al. The value of CMR Left ventricular strain analysis in evaluating ICM. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 39, 651–657 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-022-02761-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-022-02761-2

Keywords

Navigation