Skip to main content
Log in

Implications of transient ischemic dilatation and impaired left ventricular ejection fraction reserve in patients with normal stress myocardial perfusion imaging and elevated coronary artery calcium

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Guidelines recommend stress only (SO) myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) without follow-up rest imaging if perfusion and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) are normal. However additional rest imaging may show transient ischaemic dilation (TID) and/or impaired LVEF reserve (iLVEFr) suggestive of ‘balanced ischemia’. Concurrent coronary artery calcium (CAC) scoring helps to identify subclinical atherosclerosis. The safety of SO MPI when CAC is elevated is unclear. We aim to assess the incidence and outcomes of TID and iLVEFr amongst stress/rest MPIs with normal SO images and elevated CAC.

Methods

Retrospective analysis of normal stress/rest MPIs performed between 1 March 2016 to 31 January 2017 with concurrently measured CAC >300. Cases were stratified by presence of TID and/or iLVEFr. Major adverse cardiac events (MACE, defined as cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction and revascularization) within 24 months were compared.

Results

There were 230 cases included of which 43 (18.7%) had TID and/or iLVEFr. Presence of TID and/or iLVEFr was associated with higher 24-month MACE (23.3 vs. 8.6%, p = 0.013), driven by more elective revascularizations (18.6 vs. 4.3%, p = 0.001). Cardiac death and non-fatal myocardial infarction rates were similar. TID and/or iLVEFr significantly predicted overall MACE after multivariate analysis (OR 2.933 [1.214 - 7.087], p = 0.017).

Conclusions

TID and/or iLVEFr is seen in the minority of normal stress MPI with elevated CAC, and is associated with higher 24-month MACE, driven by higher elective revascularizations. Overall cardiac death and non-fatal myocardial infarction rates were low and not significantly different between both groups.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dorbala S, Ananthasubramaniam K, Armstrong IS, Chareonthaitawee P, DePuey EG, Einstein AJ, Gropler RJ, Holly TA, Mahmarian JJ, Park MA, Polk DM, Russell R 3, Slomka PJ, Thompson RC, Wells RG (2018) Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Guidelines: Instrumentation, Acquisition, Processing, and Interpretation. J Nucl Cardiol 25(5):1784–1846. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-018-1283-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bild DE, Detrano R, Peterson D, Guerci A, Liu K, Shahar E, Ouyang P, Jackson S, Saad MF (2005) Ethnic differences in coronary calcification: the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA). Circulation 111(10):1313–1320. doi:https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000157730.94423.4B

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Chang SM, Nabi F, Xu J, Peterson LE, Achari A, Pratt CM, Mahmarian JJ (2009) The coronary artery calcium score and stress myocardial perfusion imaging provide independent and complementary prediction of cardiac risk. J Am Coll Cardiol 54(20):1872–1882. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2009.05.071

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Engbers EM, Timmer JR, Ottervanger JP, Mouden M, Knollema S, Jager PL (2016) Prognostic Value of Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring in Addition to Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomographic Myocardial Perfusion Imaging in Symptomatic Patients. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 9(5). doi:https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.115.003966

  5. Pyslar N, Doukky R (2019) Myocardial perfusion imaging and coronary calcium score: A marriage made in heaven. J Nucl Cardiol. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-019-01966-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hida S, Chikamori T, Tanaka H, Usui Y, Igarashi Y, Nagao T, Yamashina A (2007) Diagnostic value of left ventricular function after stress and at rest in the detection of multivessel coronary artery disease as assessed by electrocardiogram-gated SPECT. J Nucl Cardiol 14(1):68–74. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclcard.2006.10.019

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Henzlova MJ, Duvall WL, Einstein AJ, Travin MI, Verberne HJ (2016) ASNC imaging guidelines for SPECT nuclear cardiology procedures: Stress, protocols, and tracers. J Nucl Cardiol 23(3):606–639. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-015-0387-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Agatston AS, Janowitz WR, Hildner FJ, Zusmer NR, Viamonte M, Detrano R (1990) Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 15(4):827–832. doi:doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0735-1097(90)90282-T

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Abidov A, Bax JJ, Hayes SW, Hachamovitch R, Cohen I, Gerlach J, Kang X, Friedman JD, Germano G, Berman DS (2003) Transient ischemic dilation ratio of the left ventricle is a significant predictor of future cardiac events in patients with otherwise normal myocardial perfusion SPECT. J Am Coll Cardiol 42(10):1818–1825. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2003.07.010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Druz RS, Akinboboye OA, Grimson R, Nichols KJ, Reichek N (2004) Postischemic stunning after adenosine vasodilator stress. J Nucl Cardiol 11(5):534–541. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclcard.2004.05.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gowd BM, Heller GV, Parker MW (2014) Stress-only SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging: a review. J Nucl Cardiol 21(6):1200–1212. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-014-9944-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Berman DS, Kang X, Slomka PJ, Gerlach J, de Yang L, Hayes SW, Friedman JD, Thomson LE, Germano G (2007) Underestimation of extent of ischemia by gated SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with left main coronary artery disease. J Nucl Cardiol 14(4):521–528. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclcard.2007.05.008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lima RS, Watson DD, Goode AR, Siadaty MS, Ragosta M, Beller GA, Samady H (2003) Incremental value of combined perfusion and function over perfusion alone by gated SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging for detection of severe three-vessel coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 42(1):64–70. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/s0735-1097(03)00562-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Yuoness SA, Goha AM, Romsa JG, Akincioglu C, Warrington JC, Datta S, Massel DR, Martell R, Gambhir S, Urbain JL, Vezina WC (2015) Very high coronary artery calcium score with normal myocardial perfusion SPECT imaging is associated with a moderate incidence of severe coronary artery disease. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 42(10):1542–1550. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-015-3072-z

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Demir H, Tan YZ, Isgoren S, Gorur GD, Kozdag G, Ural E, Berk F (2008) Comparison of exercise and pharmacological stress gated SPECT in detecting transient left ventricular dysfunction. Ann Nucl Med 22(5):403–409. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-008-0119-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Alama M, Labos C, Emery H, Iwanochko RM, Freeman M, Husain M, Lee DS (2018) Diagnostic and prognostic significance of transient ischemic dilation (TID) in myocardial perfusion imaging: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Nucl Cardiol 25(3):724–737. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-017-1040-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Valdiviezo C, Motivala AA, Hachamovitch R, Chamarthy M, Navarro PC, Ostfeld RJ, Kim M, Travin MI (2011) The significance of transient ischemic dilation in the setting of otherwise normal SPECT radionuclide myocardial perfusion images. J Nucl Cardiol 18(2):220–229. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-011-9343-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Johnson LL, Verdesca SA, Aude WY, Xavier RC, Nott LT, Campanella MW, Germano G (1997) Postischemic stunning can affect left ventricular ejection fraction and regional wall motion on post-stress gated sestamibi tomograms. J Am Coll Cardiol 30(7):1641–1648. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/s0735-1097(97)00388-4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lee DS, Yeo JS, Chung JK, Lee MM, Lee MC (2000) Transient prolonged stunning induced by dipyridamole and shown on 1- and 24-hour poststress 99mTc-MIBI gated SPECT. J Nucl Med 41(1):27–35

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hung GU, Lee KW, Chen CP, Yang KT, Lin WY (2006) Worsening of left ventricular ejection fraction induced by dipyridamole on Tl-201 gated myocardial perfusion imaging predicts significant coronary artery disease. J Nucl Cardiol 13(2):225–232. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02971247

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Dona M, Massi L, Settimo L, Bartolini M, Giannì G, Pupi A, Sciagrà R (2011) Prognostic implications of post-stress ejection fraction decrease detected by gated SPECT in the absence of stress-induced perfusion abnormalities. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 38(3):485–490. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-010-1643-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Obeidat OS, Alhouri A, Baniissa B, Alqaisi O, Akkawi M, Zyad H, Alrimawi O, Al Jabi M, Jaradat S, Jawabreh H, Al-Batsh O, Alaraj O, Juweid ME (2020) Prognostic significance of post-stress reduction in left ventricular ejection fraction with adenosine stress in Jordanian patients with normal myocardial perfusion. J Nucl Cardiol 27(5):1596–1606. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-019-01725-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Patel MR, Calhoon JH, Dehmer GJ, Grantham JA, Maddox TM, Maron DJ, Smith PK, ASE/ASNC/SCAI/SCCT/STS, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American Heart Association (2017) 2017 Appropriate Use Criteria for Coronary Revascularization in Patients With Stable Ischemic Heart Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, American Society of Echocardiography, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Am Coll Cardiol 69 (17):2212-2241. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2017.02.001

  24. Inohara T, Kohsaka S, Ueda I, Yagi T, Numasawa Y, Suzuki M, Maekawa Y, Fukuda K (2016) Application of appropriate use criteria for percutaneous coronary intervention in Japan. World J Cardiol 8(8):456–463. doi:https://doi.org/10.4330/wjc.v8.i8.456

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Lambert-Kerzner A, Maynard C, McCreight M, Ladebue A, Williams KM, Fehling KB, Bradley SM (2018) Assessment of barriers and facilitators in the implementation of appropriate use criteria for elective percutaneous coronary interventions: a qualitative study. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 18(1):164. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-018-0901-6

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Halligan WT, Morris PB, Schoepf UJ, Mischen BT, Spearman JV, Spears JR, Blanke P, Cho YJ, Silverman JR, Chiaramida SA, Ebersberger U (2014) Transient Ischemic Dilation of the Left Ventricle on SPECT: Correlation with Findings at Coronary CT Angiography. J Nucl Med 55(6):917–922. doi:https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.113.125880

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Banach M, Serban C, Sahebkar A, Mikhailidis DP, Ursoniu S, Ray KK, Rysz J, Toth PP, Muntner P, Mosteoru S, García-García HM, Hovingh GK, Kastelein JJ, Serruys PW (2015) Impact of statin therapy on coronary plaque composition: a systematic review and meta-analysis of virtual histology intravascular ultrasound studies. BMC Med 13:229. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-015-0459-4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. McEvoy JW, Blaha MJ, Defilippis AP, Budoff MJ, Nasir K, Blumenthal RS, Jones SR (2010) Coronary artery calcium progression: an important clinical measurement? A review of published reports. J Am Coll Cardiol 56(20):1613–1622. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2010.06.038

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Osei AD, Mirbolouk M, Berman D, Budoff MJ, Miedema MD, Rozanski A, Rumberger JA, Shaw L, Al Rifai M, Dzaye O, Graham GN, Banach M, Blumenthal RS, Dardari ZA, Nasir K, Blaha MJ (2021) Prognostic value of coronary artery calcium score, area, and density among individuals on statin therapy vs. non-users: The coronary artery calcium consortium. Atherosclerosis 316:79–83. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2020.10.009

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by Jonathan Wong and Min Sen Yew. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Jonathan Wong and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Min Sen Yew.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Ethics Statement

This study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Approval was granted by the National Healthcare Group Domain Specific Review Board (2017/00625). The requirement for written informed consent was waived.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wong, J.J.J., Yew, M.S. Implications of transient ischemic dilatation and impaired left ventricular ejection fraction reserve in patients with normal stress myocardial perfusion imaging and elevated coronary artery calcium. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 38, 1651–1658 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-022-02549-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-022-02549-4

Keywords

Navigation