Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The diastolic function abnormalities in hemodialysis session: a two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiographic (2DSTE) study

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Hemodialysis (HD) decreases preload and its acute effect on the diastolic function is still controversial even with the introduction of new non-volume-dependent tissue Doppler echocardiographic indices. This study is designed to evaluate these acute changes following HD sessions. We enrolled 39 patients receiving standard thrice weekly HD for more than 6 months and performed two dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography (2DSTE) and tissue Doppler studies with a standard cardiac ultrasound device shortly before and after HD. We observed significant changes in most of the transmitral flow and tissue Doppler echocardiographic parameters after HD. The left atrial volume index, left ventricular mass index, mitral E, mitral E/A, and lateral annular E/é levels decreased after HD (p: < 0.001, p: 0.026, p: < 0.001, p: 0.011, p: < 0.001, respectively). Medial á, medial myocardial performance index (MPI), medial ś, lateral ś, and lateral MPI values increased significantly after HD (p: 0.049, p: 0.007, p: 0.001, p: < 0.001, p: 0.01, respectively). Diastolic parameters like diastolic strain ratio early diastole (DSRE), diastolic strain ratio late diastole (DSRA), E/DSRE, and E/DSRA did not change significantly after HD (p: 0.716, p: 0.117, p: 0.114, and p: 0.211, respectively). The global longitudinal strain value obtained with 2DSTE worsened after HD (− 18.4 ± 4.0 before vs − 15.9 ± 5.4 after HD, p: 0.011). Transmitral flow and tissue Doppler parameters changed significantly after HD while the change in 2DSTE findings was not significant. The diastolic measurements made with 2DSTE may be less volume and cardiac preload dependent compared to conventional echocardiography and this may explain the difference.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Go AS, Chertow GM, Fan D, McCulloch CE, Hsu CY (2004) Chronic kidney disease and the risks of death, cardiovascular events, and hospitalization. N Engl J Med 351(13):1296–1305

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Foley RN (2010) Clinical epidemiology of cardiovascular disease in chronic kidney disease. J Ren Care 36(suppl 1):4–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sato W, Kosaka T, Koyama T, Ishida M, Lino K, Watanabe H, Ito H (2013) Impaired renal function is a major determinant of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction: assessment by stress myocardial perfusion imaging. Ann Nucl Med 27:729–736

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Chen J, Tang C, You T, Shi F, Zhu J (2020) Global diastolic strain rate for the assessment of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction in young peritoneal dialysis patients: a case control study. BMC Nephrol 21:89

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. McIntyre CW (2009) Effects of heamedialysis on cardiac function. Kidney Int 76:371–375

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Guler HS, Kaya C, Kumru G, Kosku H, Ozyuncu N, Sengul S, Kutlay S (2020) Acute stunning effect of hemodialysis on myocardial performance: a three dimensional speckle tracking echocardiographic study. Artif Org 44:1081–1089

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Bjallmark A, Larsson M, Nowak J, Lind B, Hayashi SY, Do Nascimento MM, Riella MC, Seeberger A, Brodin LA (2011) Effects of haemodialysis on the cardiovascular system: quantitative analysis using wave intensity wall analysis and tissue velocity imaging. Heart Vessels 26:289–297

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sarafidis PA, Kamperidis V, Loutradis C, Tsilonis K, Mpoutsiouki F, Saratzis A, Giannakoulas G, Sianos G, Karvaounis H (2016) Haemodialysis acutely deteriorates left and right diastolic function and myocardial performance: an effect related to high ultrafiltration volumes? Nephrol Dial Transpl 32(8):1402–1409

    Google Scholar 

  9. Duran M, Unal A, Inanc MT, Esin F, Yılmaz Y, Ornek E (2010) Effect of maintenance hemodialysis on diastolic left ventricular function in end-stage renal disease. Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil) 65(10):979–984

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Jenkins C, Moir S, Chan J, Rakhit D, Haluska B, Marwick TH (2009) Left ventricular volume measurement with echocardiography: a comparison of left ventricular opacification. Three dimensional echocardiography, or both with magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Heart J 30(1):98–106

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Huang JC, Su HM, Wu PY, Lee JJ, Lee WH, Chen SC, Chiu YW, Hsu YL, Chang JM, Chen HC (2019) Ratio of early mitral inflow velocity to the global diastolic strain rate and global left ventricular longitudinal systolic strain predict overall mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events in hemodialysis patients. Dis Markers 2019:7512805

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Wang J, Khoury DS, Thohan V, Torre-Amione G, Nagueh SF (2007) Global diastolic strain rate for the assessment of left ventricular relaxation and filling pressures. Circulation 115(11):1376

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Shastri S, Sarnak MJ (2010) Cardiovascular disease and CKD: core curriculum 2010. Am J Kid Dis 56(2):399–417

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Cerasola G, Nardi E, Palermo A, Mulè G, Cottone S (2011) Epidemiology and pathophysiology of left ventricular abnormalities in chronic kidney disease: a review. J Nephrol 24(1):1–10

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Koga S, Ikeda S, Matsunaga K, Naito T, Miyahara Y, Taura K, Kohno S (2003) Influence of hemodialysis on echocardiographic Doppler indices of the left ventricle: changes in parameters of systolic and diastolic function and Tei index. Clin Nephrol 59(3):180–185

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hsiao SH, Huang WC, Lee TY, Sy CL, Lin SK, Liu CP (2005) Doppler tissue imaging and color M-mode flow propagation velocity: are they really preload independent? J Am Soc Echocardiogr 18(12):1277–1284

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bhella PS, Goleski M, Grayburn PA, Levine BD (2009) Early diastolic strain rate: is it truly preload independent? Am Heart Assoc 9:358

    Google Scholar 

  18. Wang X, Hong J, Zhang T, Xu D (2021) Changes in left ventricular and atrial mechanics and function after dialysis in patients with end-stage renal disease. Quant Imaging Med Surg 11(5):1899–1908

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Ie EHY, Vletter WB, Folkert J, Nette RW, Weimar W, Roelandt JTRC, Zietse R (2003) Preload dependence of new Doppler techniques limits their utility for left ventricular diastolic function assessment in hemodialysis patients. J Am Soc Nephrol 14(7):1858–1862

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ibrahim S, Koura MA, Emara AA, Kamel M, Abd El-Waheed WA (2016) The effect of hemodialysis-induced preload changes on the left ventricular function: a speckle-tracking echocardiographic study. Menoufia Med J 29(2):406–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sonnenblick EH (1962) Force-velocity relations in mammalian heart muscle. Am J Physiol-Legacy Content 202(5):931–939

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Kloner RA (2020) Stunned and hibernating myocardium: where are we nearly 4 decades later? J Am Heart Assoc 9(3):e015502

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by HK, CTK, SS, MA, MA, and SK. The first draft of the manuscript was written by HK and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sim Kutlay.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose. The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Approval was granted by the Ethics Committee of Ankara University Institutional Committee for Science and Research Ethics (2021, İ2-149-21).

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kosku, H., Kaya, C.T., Sengul, S. et al. The diastolic function abnormalities in hemodialysis session: a two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiographic (2DSTE) study. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 38, 1453–1461 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-022-02535-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-022-02535-w

Keywords

Navigation