Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Ventriculo-arterial coupling in patients with stable ischemic heart disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To investigate ventriculo-arterial coupling (VAC) and its components (Ea, Ees) in patients with stable ischemic heart disease and changes following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). 129 patients with stable ischemic heart disease (SIHD) undergoing PCI (study group) and 40 individuals without IHD (control group) were enrolled. VAC was calculated using echocardiography method at baseline and 1, 3, and 6 months after PCI. A linear mixed-effects models with restricted maximum likelihood were used to assess the impact of PCI on Ea, Ees, VAC over 6-month follow-up. Mean age of the SIHD group was 67.8 ± 8.1 (years), and predominantly men (73.6%). In the SIHD group, baseline median Ea, Ees and VAC were 2.52 (IQR 1.89–3.28) (mmHg/ml), 3.87 (IQR 2.90–4.95) (mmHg/ml), and 0.64 (IQR 0.54–0.79), respectively. Patients with SIHD had significantly lower Ees and higher VAC when compared to the control group (p < 0.05). Ees (p = 0.01) and VAC (p < 0.001) were significantly improved over 6 month follow-up after PCI. Notably, the degree of VAC improvement appears to be related to stented artery (Table 3). VAC obtained from echocardiographic methodology demonstrated a significant increase in patients with SIHD at baseline. This observation may represent a plausible mechanism for the benefit of PCI in SIHD. Hence, VAC may be a feasible parameter in the assessment of patients with SIHD.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Requests for data access can be sent to the corresponding author at lcthuc@gmail.com.

References

  1. Sanchis-Gomar F et al (2016) Epidemiology of coronary heart disease and acute coronary syndrome. Ann Transl Med 4(13):256–256. https://doi.org/10.21037/atm.2016.06.33

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Bangalore S et al (2020) Routine revascularization versus initial medical therapy for stable ischemic heart disease. Circulation 142(9):841–857. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.048194

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Maron DJ et al (2020) Initial invasive or conservative strategy for stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med 382(15):1395–1407. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1915922

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Konstam MA, Abboud FM (2017) Ejection fraction: misunderstood and overrated (changing the paradigm in categorizing heart failure). Circulation 135(8):717–719. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.116.025795

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Voigt JU, Cvijic M (2019) 2- and 3-dimensional myocardial strain in cardiac health and disease. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 12(9):1849–1863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2019.01.044

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ikonomidis I et al (2019) The role of ventricular–arterial coupling in cardiac disease and heart failure: assessment, clinical implications and therapeutic interventions. A consensus document of the European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Aorta & Peripheral Vascular Diseases, European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging, and Heart Failure Association. Eur J Heart Fail 21(4):402–424. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.1436

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chen CH et al (2001) Noninvasive single-beat determination of left ventricular end-systolic elastance in humans. J Am Coll Cardiol 38(7):2028–2034. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0735-1097(01)01651-5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lang RM et al (2015) Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 28(1):1-39.e14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2014.10.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Monge-García MI, Santos A (2020) Understanding ventriculo-arterial coupling. Ann Transl Med 8(12):795–795. https://doi.org/10.21037/atm.2020.04.10

  10. Antonini-Canterin F et al (2009) Prognostic value of ventricular-arterial coupling and B-type natriuretic peptide in patients after myocardial infarction: a five-year follow-up study. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 22(11):1239–1245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2009.08.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Remmelink M et al (2010) The effect of repeated ischaemic periods on left ventricular dynamics during percutaneous coronary intervention. EuroIntervention 6(5):623–629. https://doi.org/10.4244/eijv6i5a104

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Chirinos JA, Sweitzer N (2017) Ventricular-arterial coupling in chronic heart failure. Cardiac Fail Rev 3(1):12–18. https://doi.org/10.15420/cfr.2017:4:2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Prabhu SD (2007) Altered left ventricular-arterial coupling precedes pump dysfunction in early heart failure. Heart Vessels 22(3):170–177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00380-006-0954-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kawaguchi M et al (2003) Combined ventricular systolic and arterial stiffening in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction: implications for systolic and diastolic reserve limitations. Circulation 107(5):714–720. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.0000048123.22359.a0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kass DA (2002) Age-related changes in venticular-arterial coupling: pathophysiologic implications. Heart Fail Rev 7(1):51–62. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1013749806227

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Mathieu M et al (2010) Ventricular-arterial uncoupling in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction after myocardial infarction in dogs - invasive versus echocardiographic evaluation. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 10(1):32. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2261-10-32

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors received no financial support for this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

These authors take responsibility for all aspects of the reliability and freedom from bias of the data presented and their discussed interpretation.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thuc Luong Cong.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest of this work.

Ethical approval

The study was approved by the hospital's Institutional Review Board.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 14 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Duc, H.T., Thu, H.P.V., Truong, V.T. et al. Ventriculo-arterial coupling in patients with stable ischemic heart disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 38, 571–577 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-021-02437-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-021-02437-3

Keywords

Navigation