Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Value of echocardiography using knowledge-based reconstruction in determining right ventricular volumes in pulmonary sarcoidosis: comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Right ventricular (RV) dysfunction in sarcoidosis is associated with adverse outcomes. Assessment of RV function by conventional transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is challenging due to the complex RV geometry. Knowledge-based reconstruction (KBR) combines TTE measurements with three-dimensional coordinates to determine RV volumes. The aim of this study was to investigate the accuracy of TTE-KBR compared to the gold standard cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) in determining RV dimensions in pulmonary sarcoidosis. Pulmonary sarcoidosis patients prospectively received same-day TTE and TTE-KBR. If performed, CMR within 90 days after TTE-KBR was used as reference standard. Outcome parameters included RV end-diastolic volume (RVEDV), end-systolic volume (RVESV), stroke volume (RVSV) and ejection fraction (RVEF). 281 patients underwent same day TTE and TTE-KBR. In total, 122 patients received a CMR within 90 days of TTE and were included. TTE-KBR measured RVEDV and RVESV showed strong correlation with CMR measurements (R = 0.73, R = 0.76), while RVSV and RVEF correlated weakly (R = 0.46, R = 0.46). Bland–Altman analyses (mean bias ± 95% limits of agreement), showed good agreement for RVEDV (ΔRVEDVKBR-CMR, 5.67 ± 55.4 mL), while RVESV, RVSV and RVEF showed poor agreement (ΔRVESVKBR-CMR, 21.6 ± 34.1 mL; ΔRVSVKBR-CMR, − 16.1 ± 42.9 mL; ΔRVEFKBR-CMR, − 12.9 ± 16.4%). The image quality and time between CMR and TTE-KBR showed no impact on intermodality differences and there was no sign of a possible learning curve. TTE-KBR is convenient and shows good agreement with CMR for RVEDV. However, there is poor agreement for RVESV, RVSV and RVEF. The use of TTE-KBR does not seem to provide additional value in the determination of RV dimensions in pulmonary sarcoidosis patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data underlying this article will be shared on reasonable request to the corresponding author.

Abbreviations

CMR:

Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging

CS:

Cardiac sarcoidosis

EDV:

End-diastolic volume

EF:

Ejection fraction

ESV:

End-systolic volume

KBR:

Knowledge-based reconstruction

LGE:

Late gadolinium enhancement

PH:

Pulmonary hypertension

RV:

Right ventricular

SV:

Stroke volume

TTE:

Transthoracic echocardiography

References

  1. Patel MB, Mor-Avi V, Murtagh G et al (2016) Right heart involvement in patients with sarcoidosis. Echocardiography 33:734–741. https://doi.org/10.1111/echo.13163

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Joyce E, Kamperidis V, Ninaber MK et al (2016) Prevalence and correlates of early right ventricular dysfunction in sarcoidosis and its association with outcome. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 29:871–878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2016.06.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Velangi PS, Chen K-HA, Kazmirczak F et al (2020) Right ventricular abnormalities on cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in patients with sarcoidosis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 13:1395–1405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2019.12.011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ho SY, Nihoyannopoulos P (2006) Anatomy, echocardiography, and normal right ventricular dimensions. Heart 92(Suppl 1):i2-13. https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.2005.077875

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Peacock AJ, Vonk Noordegraaf A (2013) Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in pulmonary arterial hypertension. Eur Respir Rev 22:526–534. https://doi.org/10.1183/09059180.00006313

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sanz J, Conroy J, Narula J (2012) Imaging of the right ventricle. Cardiol Clin 30:189–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccl.2012.03.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bhave NM, Patel AR, Weinert L et al (2013) Three-dimensional modeling of the right ventricle from two-dimensional transthoracic echocardiographic images: utility of knowledge-based reconstruction in pulmonary arterial hypertension. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 26:860–867. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2013.05.007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Knight DS, Schwaiger JP, Krupickova S et al (2015) Accuracy and test-retest reproducibility of two-dimensional knowledge-based volumetric reconstruction of the right ventricle in pulmonary hypertension. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 28:989–998. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2015.02.020

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Dragulescu A, Grosse-Wortmann L, Fackoury C et al (2011) Echocardiographic assessment of right ventricular volumes after surgical repair of tetralogy of fallot: clinical validation of a new echocardiographic method. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 24:1191–1198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2011.08.006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Neukamm C, Try K, Norgård G, Brun H (2014) Right ventricular volumes assessed by echocardiographic three-dimensional knowledge-based reconstruction compared with magnetic resonance imaging in a clinical setting. Congenit Heart Dis 9:333–342. https://doi.org/10.1111/chd.12146

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Costabel U, Hunninghake GW (1999) ATS/ERS/WASOG statement on sarcoidosis. Sarcoidosis Statement Committee. American Thoracic Society. European Respiratory Society. World Association for Sarcoidosis and Other Granulomatous Disorders. Eur Respir J 14:735–737. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1399-3003.1999.14d02.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Miller MR (2005) General considerations for lung function testing. Eur Respir J 26:153–161. https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.05.00034505

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Galiè N, Humbert M, Vachiery J-L et al (2016) 2015 ESC/ERS Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary hypertension. Eur Heart J 37:67–119. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehv317

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Rudski LG, Lai WW, Afilalo J et al (2010) Guidelines for the echocardiographic assessment of the right heart in adults: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 23:685–713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2010.05.010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Petersen SE, Aung N, Sanghvi MM et al (2017) Reference ranges for cardiac structure and function using cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) in Caucasians from the UK Biobank population cohort. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 19:18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12968-017-0327-9

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Laser KT, Horst J-P, Barth P et al (2014) Knowledge-based reconstruction of right ventricular volumes using real-time three-dimensional echocardiographic as well as cardiac magnetic resonance images: comparison with a cardiac magnetic resonance standard. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 27:1087–1097. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2014.05.008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by ZonMw (The Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Harold Mathijssen.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. The study was approved by the MEC-U Institutional Review Board (NL49594.100.14).

Consent to participate

Written informed consent was obtained from all patients included in the study.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent regarding the publication of the study data was obtained from all patients.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 20 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mathijssen, H., Huitema, M.P., Bakker, A.L.M. et al. Value of echocardiography using knowledge-based reconstruction in determining right ventricular volumes in pulmonary sarcoidosis: comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 38, 309–316 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-021-02405-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-021-02405-x

Keywords

Navigation