Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Aortic strain in bicuspid aortic valve: an analysis

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) is monitored by transthoracic echocardiography and computed tomography (CT) angiography. However, it does not have any early marker of disease progression. This study evaluated speckle-tracking echocardiography (STE) aortic and left ventricular (LV) strain prognostic values, their discriminative power, and their correlation with the degree of valvular regurgitation. We conducted a retrospective analysis of a prospectively enrolled cohort of 45 diagnosed with BAV and 20 gender and age matched controls. We performed 2D-STE aortic and LV strain analysis of the selected population. The cohort was followed-up during a median period of 19.9 months (IQR 12.9–25.2), and outcomes (hospital admission for heart failure (HF), aortic valve replacement (AVR), and death) were determined. The mean patient age was 46.6 ± 15.5 years and 80 % were male. LV indexed volumes and aortic diameter were higher in BAV patients. LV global longitudinal strain (GLS) was impaired (p < 0.001) and aortic GLS was significantly augmented (p = 0.027) in BAV patients. Aortic global circumferential strain (GCS) did not vary between groups. Aortic diameter was the best parameter related to BAV (AUC 0.92) and aortic GLS was best correlated with significant AR (AUC 0.76). AVR was the only outcome observed and its only predictor was indexed LV end-diastolic volume. BAV had impaired LV-GLS values. Aortic GLS was abnormally augmented in BAV patients, which might reflect higher aortic diameters that distorted strain calculations. STE aortic strain is related to AR but does not appear to be a reliable predictor of surgery in BAV patients, at 19 months.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

2D:

Two-dimensional

Ao-CSmax:

Aortic circumferential strain (maximum)

Ao-CSmin:

Aortic circumferential strain (minimum)

Ao-GCS:

Aortic global circumferential strain

Ao-GLS:

Aortic global longitudinal strain

Ao-LSmax:

Aortic longitudinal strain (maximum)

Ao-LSmin:

Aortic longitudinal strain (minimum)

AR:

Aortic regurgitation

AS:

Aortic stenosis

AUC:

Area under the curve

AVR:

Aortic valve replacement

BAV:

Bicuspid aortic valve

CI:

Confidence interval

CT:

Computed tomography

GLS:

Global longitudinal strain

HF:

Heart failure

IQR:

Interquartile range

IVS:

Interventricular septum

LV:

Left ventricle

LVEDD:

Left ventricle end-diastolic diameter

LVEDVi:

Left ventricle end-diastolic volume (indexed)

LVEF:

Left ventricle ejection fraction

LV-GLS:

Left ventricle global longitudinal strain

ROC:

Receiver operating characteristics

STE:

Speckle-tracking echocardiography

References

  1. Rodrigues I, Agapito AF, de Sousa L, Oliveira JA, Branco LM, Galrinho A, Abreu J, Timóteo AT, Rosa SA, Ferreira RC (2017) Bicuspid aortic valve outcomes. Cardiol Young 27:518–529. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1047951116002560

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Meierhofer C, Schneider EP, Lyko C, Hutter A, Martinoff S, Markl M, Hager A, Hess J, Stern H, Fratz S (2013) Wall shear stress and flow patterns in the ascending aorta in patients with bicuspid aortic valves differ significantly from tricuspid aortic valves: a prospective study. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jes273

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Tzemos N, Therrien J, Yip J, Thanassoulis G, Tremblay S, Jamorski MT, Webb GD, Siu SC (2008) Outcomes in adults with bicuspid aortic valves. JAMA - J Am Med Assoc. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.300.11.1317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Li Y, Deng Y-B, Bi X-J, Liu Y-N, Zhang J, Li L (2016) Evaluation of myocardial strain and artery elasticity using speckle tracking echocardiography and high-resolution ultrasound in patients with bicuspid aortic valve. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 32:1063–1069. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-016-0876-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Conti CA, Della Corte A, Votta E, Del Viscovo L, Bancone C, De Santo LS, Redaelli A (2010) Biomechanical implications of the congenital bicuspid aortic valve: A finite element study of aortic root function from in vivo data. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.01.016

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Erbel R, Aboyans V, Boileau C, Bossone E, Di Bartolomeo R, Eggebrecht H, Evangelista A, Falk V, Frank H, Gaemperli O, Grabenwöger M, Haverich A, Iung B, Manolis AJ, Meijboom F, Nienaber CA, Roffi M, Rousseau H, Sechtem U, Sirnes PA, von Allmen RS, Vrints CJM (2014) 2014 ESC Guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of aortic diseases: Document covering acute and chronic aortic diseases of the thoracic and abdominal aorta of the adult. The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Aortic Diseases of the European, Eur. Heart J 35:2873–2926. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehu281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Siu SC, Silversides CK, Disease BAorticV, J Am Coll Cardiol (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2009.12.068

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Nucifora G, Miller J, Gillebert C, Shah R, Perry R, Raven C, Joseph MX, Selvanayagam JB (2018) Ascending Aorta and Myocardial Mechanics in Patients with “Clinically Normal” Bicuspid Aortic Valve. Int Heart J 59:741–749. https://doi.org/10.1536/ihj.17-230

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Soto-Navarrete MT, López-Unzu M, Durán AC, Fernández B (2020) Embryonic development of bicuspid aortic valves. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 63:407–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcad.2020.06.008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Santarpia G, Scognamiglio G, Di Salvo G, D’Alto M, Sarubbi B, Romeo E, Indolfi C, Cotrufo M, Calabrò R (2012) Aortic and left ventricular remodeling in patients with bicuspid aortic valve without significant valvular dysfunction: A prospective study. Int J Cardiol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2011.01.046

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kiefer TL, Wang A, Hughes GC, Bashore TM (2011) Management of patients with bicuspid aortic valve disease. Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11936-011-0152-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Mordi I, Tzemos N (2012) Bicuspid aortic valve disease: A comprehensive review. Cardiol Res Pract. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/196037

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Ward C (2000) Clinical significance of the bicuspid aortic valve. Heart. https://doi.org/10.1136/heart.83.1.81

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Chatterjee K, de Leon AC, Faxon DP, Freed MD, Gaasch WH, Lytle BW, Nishimura RA, O’Gara PT, O’Rourke RA, Otto CM, Shah PM, Shanewise JS, Smith SC, Jacobs AK, Adams CD, Anderson JL, Antman EM, Faxon DP, Fuster V, Halperin JL, Hiratzka LF, Hunt SA, Lytle BW, Nishimura R, Page RL, Riegel B (2006) ACC/AHA 2006 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2006.05.021

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Robicsek F, Thubrikar MJ, Cook JW, Fowler B (2004) The congenitally bicuspid aortic valve: How does it function? Why does it fail? Ann Thorac Surg. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-4975(03)01249-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Grotenhuis HB, Ottenkamp J, Westenberg JJM, Bax JJ, Kroft LJM, de Roos A (2007) Reduced Aortic Elasticity and Dilatation Are Associated With Aortic Regurgitation and Left Ventricular Hypertrophy in Nonstenotic Bicuspid Aortic Valve Patients. J Am Coll Cardiol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2006.12.044

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Girdauskas E, Borger MA, Secknus MA, Girdauskas G, Kuntze T (2011) Is aortopathy in bicuspid aortic valve disease a congenital defect or a result of abnormal hemodynamics? A critical reappraisal of a one-sided argument. Eur J Cardio-Thoracic Surg. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcts.2011.01.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bauer M, Gliech V, Siniawski H, Hetzer R (2006) Configuration of the ascending aorta in patients with bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valve disease undergoing aortic valve replacement with or without reduction aortoplasty. J. Heart Valve Dis. 15:594–600

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Michelena HI, Khanna AD, Mahoney D, Margaryan E, Topilsky Y, Suri RM, Eidem B, Edwards WD, Sundt TM, Enriquez-Sarano M (2011) Incidence of aortic complications in patients with bicuspid aortic valves. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2011.1286

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bonderman D, Gharehbaghi-Schnell E, Wollenek G, Maurer G, Baumgartner H, Lang IM (1999) Mechanisms underlying aortic dilatation in congenital aortic valve malformation. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.99.16.2138

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lewin MB, Otto CM (2005) The bicuspid aortic valve: Adverse outcomes from infancy to old age. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000157137.59691.0B

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Michelena HI, Desjardins VA, Avierinos JF, Russo A, Nkomo VT, Sundt TM, Pellikka PA, Tajik AJ, Enriquez-Sarano M (2008) Natural history of asymptomatic patients with normally functioning or minimally dysfunctional bicuspid aortic valve in the community. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.740878

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Kong WKF, Vollema EM, Prevedello F, Perry R, Ng ACT, Poh KK, Almeida AG, González A, Shen M, Yeo TC, Shanks M, Popescu BA, Galian Gay L, Fijałkowski M, Liang M, Chen RW, Ajmone Marsan N, Selvanayagam J, Pinto F, Zamorano JL, Pibarot P, Evangelista A, Delgado V, Bax JJ (2020) Prognostic implications of left ventricular global longitudinal strain in patients with bicuspid aortic valve disease and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 21:759–767. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jez252

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Marques-Alves P, Marinho AV, Teixeira R, Baptista R, Castro G, Martins R, Goncalves L (2019) Going beyond classic echo in aortic stenosis: Left atrial mechanics, a new marker of severity. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-019-1204-2

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Leite L, Teixeira R, Oliveira-Santos M, Barbosa A, Martins R, Castro G, Gonçalves L, Pego M (2016) Aortic Valve Disease and Vascular Mechanics: Two-Dimensional Speckle Tracking Echocardiographic Analysis. Echocardiography 33:1121–1130. https://doi.org/10.1111/echo.13236

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Stefani L, De Luca A, Maffulli N, Mercuri R, Innocenti G, Suliman I, Toncelli L, Vono MC, Cappelli B, Pedri S, Pedrizzetti G, Galanti G (2009) Speckle tracking for left ventricle performance in young athletes with bicuspid aortic valve and mild aortic regurgitation. Eur J Echocardiogr J Work Gr Echocardiogr Eur Soc Cardiol 10:527–531. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejechocard/jen332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Teixeira R, Monteiro R, Baptista R, Barbosa A, Leite L, Ribeiro M, Martins R, Cardim N, Gonçalves L (2015) Circumferential vascular strain rate to estimate vascular load in aortic stenosis: a speckle tracking echocardiography study. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-015-0597-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Marques-Alves P, Espírito-Santo N, Baptista R, Teixeira R, Martins R, Gonçalves F, Pego M (2018) Two-dimensional speckle-tracking global longitudinal strain in high-sensitivity troponin-negative low-risk patients with unstable angina: a “resting ischemia test”? Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-017-1269-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Nagueh SF, Semiseth OA, Appleton CP, Byrd BF, Dokainish H, Edvardsen T, Flachskampf FA, Gillebert TC, Klein AL, Lancellotti P, Marino P, Oh JK, Popescu BA, Waggoner AD, Recommendations for the evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function by echocardiography: an update frome the American Socienty of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging, Eur H J Cardiovasc Imaging. https://doi.10,1093/ehjci/jew082

  30. Lang RM, Badano LP, Mor-Avi V, Afilalo J, Armstrong A, Ernande L, Flachskampf FA, Foster E, Goldstein SA, Kuznetsova T, Lancellotti P, Muraru D, Picard MH, Rietzschel ER, Rudski L, Spencer KT, Tsang W, Voigt JU (2015) Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: An update from the American society of echocardiography and the European association of cardiovascular imaging. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jev014

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Voigt JU, Pedrizzetti G, Lysyansky P, Marwick TH, Houle H, Baumann R, Pedri S, Ito Y, Abe Y, Metz S, Song JHyu, Hamilton J, Sengupta PP, Kolias TJ, d’Hooge J, Aurigemma GP, Thomas JD (2015) Definitions for a common standard for 2D speckle tracking echocardiography: consensus document of the EACVI/ASE/Industry Task Force to standardize deformation imaging. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jeu184

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Teixeira R, Moreira N, Baptista R, Barbosa A, Martins R, Castro G, Providência L (2013) Circumferential ascending aortic strain and aortic stenosis. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 14:631–641. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jes221

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Baumgartner H, Falk V, Bax JJ, De Bonis M, Hamm C, Holm PJ, Iung B, Lancellotti P, Lansac E, Muñoz DR, Rosenhek R, Sjögren J, Tornos Mas P, Vahanian A, Walther T, Wendler O, Windecker S, Zamorano JL, Roffi M, Alfieri O, Agewall S, Ahlsson A, Barbato E, Bueno H, Collet JP, Coman IM, Czerny M, Delgado V, Fitzsimons D, Folliguet T, Gaemperli O, Habib G, Harringer W, Haude M, Hindricks G, Katus HA, Knuuti J, Kolh P, Leclercq C, McDonagh TA, Piepoli MF, Pierard LA, Ponikowski P, Rosano GMC, Ruschitzka F, Shlyakhto E, Simpson IA, Sousa-Uva M, Stepinska J, Tarantini G, Tche D, Aboyans V, Kzhdryan HK, Mascherbauer J, Samadov F, Shumavets V, Van Camp G, Loncar D, Lovric D, Georgiou GM, Linhartova K, Ihlemann N, Abdelhamid M, Pern T, Turpeinen A, Srbinovska-Kostovska E, Cohen A, Bakhutashvili Z, Ince H, Vavuranakis M, Temesvari A, Gudnason T, Mylotte D, Kuperstein R, Indolfi C, Pya Y, Bajraktari G, Kerimkulova A, Rudzitis A, Mizariene V, Lebrun F, Demarco DC, Oukerraj L, Bouma BJ, Steigen TK, Komar M, De Moura Branco LM, Popescu BA, Uspenskiy V, Foscoli M, Jovovic L, Simkova I, Bunc M, J.A.V. de Prada M, Stagmo BA, Kaufmann A, Mahdhaoui E, Bozkurt E, Nesukay, S.J.D. Brecker, 2017 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease, Eur. Heart J (2017) https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehx391

  34. Moaref A, Khavanin M, Shekarforoush S (2014) Aortic distensibility in bicuspid aortic valve patients with normal aortic diameter, Ther. Adv Cardiovasc Dis. https://doi.org/10.1177/1753944714531062

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Goudot G, Mirault T, Bruneval P, Soulat G, Pernot M, Messas E (2019) Aortic wall elastic properties in case of bicuspid aortic valve. Front Physiol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2019.00299

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Longobardo L, Carerj ML, Pizzino G, Bitto A, Piccione MC, Zucco M, Oreto L, Todaro MC, Calabrò MP, Squadrito F, Di Bella G, Oreto G, Khandheria BK, Carerj S, Zito C (2018) Impairment of elastic properties of the aorta in bicuspid aortic valve: Relationship between biomolecular and aortic strain patterns, Eur. Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jex224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Nistri S, Grande-Allen J, Noale M, Basso C, Siviero P, Maggi S, Crepaldi G, Thiene G (2008) Aortic elasticity and size in bicuspid aortic valve syndrome. Eur Heart J. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehm528

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study did not receive any specific funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Author notes

  1. Tomás Carlos and André Azul Freitas have contributed equally to this work.

    Authors

    Corresponding author

    Correspondence to Patrícia Marques Alves.

    Ethics declarations

    Conflict of interest

    The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

    Ethical approval

    All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national reearch committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The study was approved by the institutional scientific and bioethical committees.

    Additional information

    Publisher’s note

    Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

    Supplementary information

    Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

    Supplementary Material 1

    Supplementary Material 2

    Supplementary Material 3

    Rights and permissions

    Reprints and permissions

    About this article

    Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

    Cite this article

    Carlos, T., Freitas, A.A., Alves, P.M. et al. Aortic strain in bicuspid aortic valve: an analysis. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 37, 2399–2408 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-021-02215-1

    Download citation

    • Received:

    • Accepted:

    • Published:

    • Issue Date:

    • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-021-02215-1

    Keywords

    Navigation