Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Inadequately low left ventricular mass in patients with significant aortic stenosis predicts favourable prognostic outcomes

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In patients with significant aortic stenosis (AS), the prognostic effect of the increase in left ventricular mass (LVM) in relation to one’s hemodynamic load has been described. Inappropriately high LVM has been shown to predict adverse cardiovascular events. However, little is known about the prognostic impact of inadequately low LVM (i-lowLVM) in patients with significant AS. I-lowLVM was defined as the measured LVM < 73% of the predicted LVM based on sex, stroke work and height from the reference adult population, used in previous established studies. For outcome analysis, the end-point was defined as all-cause mortality, aortic valve replacement and/or admission for congestive heart failure. Kaplan–Meier curves and multivariable Cox regression models were constructed to compare outcomes on follow-up. During the follow-up (4.5 ± 4.1 years), 132 patients (11.1%) had i-lowLVM, 868 (73.1%) had adequate-LVM, 188 (15.8%) had inappropriately high LVM. Outcome analysis only included patients with i-lowLVM and adequate-LVM (N = 1000). An adverse composite event occurred in 41.7% of the i-lowLVM group and 52.4% of the adequate-LVM group (p = 0.021). Event-free survival in patients with i-lowLVM and appropriate-LVM was 76% versus 68% at 2-year, 55% versus 46% at 4-year, 33% versus 27% at 6-year, 20% versus 17% at 8-year, and 17% versus 11% at 10-year follow-up, respectively (p < 0.001). Cox analysis revealed that i-lowLVM was independently associated with lower composite adverse outcome (HR 0.624, 95% CI 0.460–0.846, p = 0.002) after adjusting for sex, age, ejection fraction, ischemic heart disease, diabetes and transaortic valve mean gradient. In the separate Cox subanalyses, the presence of i-lowLVM remained a predictor of lower composite adverse outcome in the severe AS subgroup (HR 0.587, 95% CI 0.396–0.870, p = 0.008), and the LVH subgroup (HR 0.574, 95% CI 0.401–0.824, p = 0.003) after adjusting for confounders. I-lowLVM despite significant AS may represent a distinct group that is associated with improved survival outcomes independent of other prognostic covariates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cioffi G, Faggiano P, Vizzardi E et al (2011) Prognostic effect of inappropriately high left ventricular mass in asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis. Heart 97:301–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Aurigemma GP, Silver KH, McLaughlin M et al (1994) Impact of chamber geometry and gender on left ventricular systolic function in patients > 60 years of age with aortic stenosis. Am J Cardiol 74:794–798

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. de Simone G, Verdecchia P, Pede S et al (2002) Prognosis of inappropriate left ventricular mass in hypertension: the MAVI Study. Hypertension 40:470–476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kupari M, Turto H, Lommi J (2005) Left ventricular hypertrophy in aortic valve stenosis: preventive or promotive of systolic dysfunction and heart failure? Eur Heart J 26:1790–1796

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Palmieri V, Wachtell K, Gerdts E et al (2001) Left ventricular function and hemodynamic features of inappropriate left ventricular hypertrophy in patients with systemic hypertension: the LIFE study. Am Heart J 141(5):784–791

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. de Simone G, Palmieri V, Koren MJ et al (2001) Prognostic implications of the compensatory nature of left ventricular mass in arterial hypertension. J Hypertens 19:119–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Baumgartner H, Hung J, Bermejo J et al (2017) Recommendations on the echocardiographic assessment of aortic valve stenosis: a focused update from the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging and the American Society of Echocardiography. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 18:254–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lang RM, Badano LP, Mor-Avi V et al (2015) Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American society of echocardiography and the European association of cardiovascular imaging. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 16:233–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Baumgartner H, Hung J, Bermejo J et al (2009) Echocardiographic assessment of valve stenosis: EAE/ASE recommendations for clinical practice. Eur J Echocardiogr 10:1–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Teichholz LE, Kreulen T, Herman MV, Gorlin R (1976) Problems in echocardiographic volume determinations: echocardiographic-angiographic correlations in the presence of absence of asynergy. Am J Cardiol 37:7–11

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Cioffi G, De Simone G, Cramariuc D, Mureddu GF, Gerdts E (2012) Inappropriately high left-ventricular mass in asymptomatic mild-moderate aortic stenosis. J Hypertens 30:421–428

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. De Simone G, Devereux RB, Kimball TR et al (1998) Interaction between body size and cardiac workload: influence on left ventricular mass during body growth and adulthood. Hypertension 31:1077–1082

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Dlugosz D, Bolt K, Sam WS et al (2018) Excessive left ventricular hypertrophy in moderate degenerative aortic stenosis: an ineffective compensatory mechanism triggered by primary myocardial dysfunction and enhanced by concomitant mild renal impairment? Kardiol Pol 76:1486–1488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Chyrchel B, Długosz D, Bolt K et al (2018) Association of inadequately low left ventricular mass with enhanced myocardial contractility in severe degenerative aortic stenosis. J Clin Med 7:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. de Simone G, Roman MJ, Daniels SR, Mureddu G, Kimball TR, Greco R, Devereux RB (1997) Age-related changes in total arterial capacitance from birth to maturity in a normotensive population. Hypertension 29:1213–1217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. de Simone G, Pasanisi F, Contaldo F (2001) Link of nonhemodynamic factors to hemodynamic determinants of left ventricular hypertrophy. Hypertension 38:13–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Chinali M, De Marco M, D’addeo G et al (2007) Excessive increase in left ventricular mass identifies hypertensive subjects with clustered geometric and functional abnormalities. J Hypertens 25:1073–1078

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. de Simone G, Gottdiener JS, Chinali M et al (2008) Left ventricular mass predicts heart failure not related to previous myocardial infarction: the Cardiovascular Health Study. Eur Heart J 29:741–747

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Aurigemma GP, Silver KH, Priest MA, Gaasch WH (1995) Geometric changes allow normal ejection fraction despite depressed myocardial shortening in hypertensive left ventricular hypertrophy. J Am Coll Cardiol 26:195–202

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Aurigemma GP, Devereux RB, De Simone G et al (2002) Myocardial function and geometry in hypertensive subjects with low levels of afterload. Am Heart J 143:546–551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 2008 focused update incorporated into ACC/AHA (2008) 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 52:1–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Briand M, Dumesnil JG, Kadem L et al (2005) Reduced systemic arterial compliance impacts significantly on left ventricular afterload and function in aortic stenosis: implications for diagnosis and treatment. J Am Coll Cardiol 46:291–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Pellikka PA, Nishimura RA, Bailey KR et al (1990) The natural history of adults with asymptomatic, hemodynamically significant aortic stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 15:1012–1017

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Otto CM, Burwash IG, Legget ME et al (1997) Prospective study of asymptomatic valvular aortic stenosis: clinical, echocardiographic, and exercise predictors of outcome. Circulation 95:2241–2243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Devereux RB, Wachtell K, Gerdts E et al (2004) Prognostic significance of left ventricular mass change during treatment of hypertension. JAMA 292:2350–2356

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Gošev I, Zeljko M, Đurić Ž, Nikolić I, Gošev M, Ivčević S, Bešić D, Legčević Z, Paić F (2017) Epigenome alterations in aortic valve stenosis and its related left ventricular hypertrophy. Clin Epigenet 9:106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Treibel TA, Fontana M, Gilbertson JA, Castelletti S, White SK, Scully PR, Roberts N, Hutt DF, Rowczenio DM, Whelan CJ, Ashworth MA, Gillmore JD, Hawkins PN, Moon JC (2016) Occult transthyretin cardiac amyloid in severe calci c aortic stenosis: prevalence and prognosis in patients undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 9:e005066

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Cavalcante JL, Rijal S, Abdelkarim I, Althouse AD, Sharbaugh MS, Fridman Y, Soman P, Forman DE, Schindler JT, Gleason TG, Lee JS, Schelbert EB (2017) Cardiac amyloidosis is prevalent in older patients with aortic stenosis and carries worse prognosis. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 19:98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Nitsche C, Aschauer S, Kammerlander AA et al (2020) Light-chain and transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis in severe aortic stenosis: prevalence, screening possibilities, and outcome. Eur J Heart Fail 22(10):1852–1862

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the (2014) management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 63:57–183

    Google Scholar 

  31. Vollema EM, Prihadi EA, Ng ACT, Gegenava T, Ajmone Marsan N, Bax JJ, Delgado V (2020) Prognostic implications of renal dysfunction in patients with aortic stenosis. Am J Cardiol 125(7):1108–1114

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Ching-Hui Sia was supported by the National University of Singapore Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine’s Junior Academic Faculty Scheme.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kian Keong Poh.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This study was conducted in accordance to the revised Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the institutional review committee.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chew, N.W.S., Ngiam, J.N., Tan, B. Q. et al. Inadequately low left ventricular mass in patients with significant aortic stenosis predicts favourable prognostic outcomes. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 37, 1611–1619 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-020-02146-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-020-02146-3

Keywords

Navigation