Skip to main content
Log in

Diagnosis of patent foramen ovale using maximum intensity T-projection imaging

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Accurate diagnosis of patent foramen ovale (PFO) and grading of right-to-left shunt severity by the standard method of transthoracic or transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) with bubble injection is often challenging. We proposed the novel Maximum Intensity T-Projection (MIP) Imaging method as a complementary or alternative approach for simplified diagnosis and grading of PFO. MIP Imaging represents the superimposition of all frames of an echocardiographic video onto one image. Thus, all bubbles passing from right to left atrium are represented in this single image. Diagnosis and quantification of PFO by MIP Images were compared to those obtained by standard echocardiographic methods, using the same echocardiography video loops. We applied the MIP Imaging approach to 122 echo examinations (75% of them TEE studies), performed to rule out PFOs. The average time needed to manually analyze video loops taken during bubble injection was 102 ± 52 s vs. less than 1 s using the MIP Imaging method. There was good concordance between the conventional echo method and MIP Imaging in the diagnosis and quantification of PFOs. MIP Imaging for diagnosis and quantification of PFOs was much less time consuming than the classical method and at least as accurate as the classical method. Thus MIP Imaging may be used initially as an adjunct method for PFO diagnosis and quantification and may eventually replace the classical method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kamel H (2018) Evidence-based management of patent foramen ovale in patients with ischemic stroke. JAMA Neurol 75(2):147–148. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2017.3982

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Silvestry FE, Cohen MS, Armsby LB, Burkule NJ, Fleishman CE, Hijazi ZM, Lang RM, Rome JJ, Wang Y (2015) Guidelines for the echocardiographic assessment of atrial septal defect and patent foramen ovale From the American Society of Echocardiography and Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 28(8):910–958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2015.05.015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Saric M, Armour AC, Arnaout MS, Chaudhry FA, Grimm RA, Kronzon I, Landeck BF, Maganti K, Michelena HI, Tolstrup K (2016) J Am Soc Echocardiogr 29(1):1–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2015.09.011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Stewart MJ (2003) Contrast echocardiography. Heart 89(3):342–348. https://doi.org/10.1136/heart.89.3.342

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Rana BS, Thomas MR, Calvert PA, Monaghan MJ, Hildick-Smith D (2010) JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 3(7):749–760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2010.01.007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Vitarelli A, Mangieri E, Capotosto L, Tanzilli G, D’Angeli I, Toni D, Azzano A, Ricci S, Placanica A, Rinaldi E, Mukred K, Placanica G, Ashurov R (2014) Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 15(12):1377–1385. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jeu143

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Furlan AJ, Reisman M, Massaro J, Mauri L, Adams H, Albers GW, Felberg R, Herrmann H, Kar S, Landzberg M, Raizner A, Wechsler L, Investigators CLOSUREI (2012) Closure or medical therapy for cryptogenic stroke with patent foramen ovale. N Engl J Med 366(11):991–999. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1009639

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Meier B, Kalesan B, Mattle HP, Khattab AA, Hildick-Smith D, Dudek D, Andersen G, Ibrahim R, Schuler G, Walton AS, Wahl A, Windecker S, Jüni P, Trial Investigators PC (2013) Percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale in cryptogenic embolism. N Engl J Med 368(12):1083–1091. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1211716

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Carroll JD, Saver JL, Thaler DE, Smalling RW, Berry S, MacDonald LA, Marks DS, Tirschwell DL, Investigators RESPECT (2013) Closure of patent foramen ovale versus medical therapy after cryptogenic stroke. N Engl J Med 368(12):1092–1100. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1301440

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mas JL, Derumeaux G, Guillon B, Massardier E, Hosseini H, Mechtouff L, Arquizan C, Béjot Y, Vuillier F, Detante O, Guidoux C, Canaple S, Vaduva C, Dequatre-Ponchelle N, Sibon I, Garnier P, Ferrier A, Timsit S, Robinet-Borgomano E, Sablot D, Lacour JC, Zuber M, Favrole P, Pinel JF, Apoil M, Reiner P, Lefebvre C, Guérin P, Piot C, Rossi R, Dubois-Randé JL, Eicher JC, Meneveau N, Lusson JR, Bertrand B, Schleich JM, Godart F, Thambo JB, Leborgne L, Michel P, Pierard L, Turc G, Barthelet M, Charles-Nelson A, Weimar C, Moulin T, Juliard JM, Chatellier G, Investigators CLOSE (2017) Patent foramen ovale closure or anticoagulation vs antiplatelets after stroke. N Engl J Med 377(11):1011–1021. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1705915

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Søndergaard L, Kasner SE, Rhodes JF, Andersen G, Iversen HK, Nielsen-Kudsk JE, Settergren M, Sjöstrand C, Roine RO, Hildick-Smith D, Spence JD, Thomassen L, Gore REDUCE Clinical Study Investigators (2017) Patent foramen ovale closure or antiplatelet therapy for cryptogenic stroke. N Engl J Med 377(11):1033–1042. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1707404

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Yamashita E, Murata T, Goto E, Fujiwara T, Sasaki T, Minami K, Nakamura K, Kumagai K, Naito S, Kario K, Oshima S (2017) Inferior vena cava compression as a novel maneuver to detect patent foramen ovale A transesophageal echocardiographic sStudy. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 30:292–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2016.11.011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sato Y, Shiraga N, Nakajima S, Tamura S, Kikinis R (1998) Local maximum intensity projection (LMIP) A new rendering method for vascular visualization. Journal of Computed Assisted Tomography 22(6):912–917. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004728-199811000-00014

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Porter TR, Abdelmoneim S, Belcik JT, McCulloch ML, Mulvagh SL, Olson JJ, Porcelli C, Tsutsui JM, Wei K (2014) Guidelines for the cardiac sonographer in the performance of contrast echocardiography: a focused update from the American Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 27(8):797–810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2014.05.011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Souteyrand G, Motreff P, Lusson JR, Rodriguez R, Geoffroy E, Dauphin C, Boire JY, Lamaison D, Cassagnes J (2006) Eur J Echocardiogr 7(2):147–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euje.2005.04.007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Komar M, Olszowska M, Przewłocki T et al (2014) Transcranial Doppler ultrasonography should it be the first choice for persistent foramen ovale screening? Cardiovasc Ultrasound 12:16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Jauss M, Zanette E (2000) Detection of right-to-left shunt with ultrasound contrast agent and transcranial Doppler sonography. Cerebrovasc Dis 10(6):490–496. https://doi.org/10.1159/000016119

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Mojadidi MK, Roberts SC, Winoker JS, Romero J, Goodman-Meza D, Gevorgyan R, Tobis JM (2014) Accuracy of transcranial Doppler for the diagnosis of intracardiac right-to-left shunt: a bivariate meta-analysis of prospective studies. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 7(3):236–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2013.12.011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Mojadidi MK, Mahmoud AN, Elgendy IY, Agarwal N, Tobis JM (2017) Transesophageal echocardiography for the detection of patent foramen ovale. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 30:933–934. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2017.05.006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. German C, Nanda NC (2015) Three-dimensional echocardiographic assessment of atrial septal defects. Ann Card Anaesth 18(1):69–73. https://doi.org/10.4103/0971-9784.148324

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Pushparajah K, Miller OI, Simpson JM (2010) 3D echocardiography of the atrial septum: anatomical features and landmarks for the echocardiographer. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 3(9):981–984. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2010.03.015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Meier B, Kalesan B, Mattle HP, Khattab AA, Hildick-Smith D, Dudek D, Andersen G, Ibrahim R, Schuler G, Walton AS, Wahl A, Windecker S, Jüni P (2013) Percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale in cryptogenic embolism. N Engl J Med 368(12):1083–1091. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1211716

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Carroll JD, Saver JL, Thaler DE, Smalling RW, Berry S, MacDonald LA, Marks DS, Tirschwell DL (2013) Closure of patent foramen ovale versus medical therapy after cryptogenic stroke. N Engl J Med 368(12):1092–1100. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1301440

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Søndergaard L, Kasner SE, Rhodes JF, Andersen G, Iversen HK, Nielsen-Kudsk JE, Settergren M, Sjöstrand C, Roine RO, Hildick-Smith D, Spence JD, Thomassen L (2017) Patent foramen ovale closure or antiplatelet therapy or cryptogenic stroke. N Engl J Med 377(11):1033–1042. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1707404

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Saver JL, Carroll JD, Thaler DE, Smalling RW, MacDonald LA, Marks DS, Tirschwell DL, Investigators RESPECT (2017) Long-term outcomes of patent foramen ovale closure or medical therapy after stroke. N Engl J Med 377(11):1022–1032. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1610057

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding was received.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marina Leitman.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

There is no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

Our study was done in accordance with the ethical standards of the local Helsinki Committee.

Informed consent

Informed consent was not required due to the retrospective nature of work with patients' files anonymously.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Leitman, M., Blondheim, D.S., Sabetay, S. et al. Diagnosis of patent foramen ovale using maximum intensity T-projection imaging. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 37, 1343–1348 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-020-02123-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-020-02123-w

Keywords

Navigation