Goo HW, Park IS, Ko JK, Kim YH, Seo DM, Park JJ (2005) Computed tomography for the diagnosis of congenital heart disease in pediatric and adult patients. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 21:347–365. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-004-4015-0
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Mehta R, Lee KJ, Chaturvedi R, Benson L (2008) Complications of pediatric cardiac catheterization: a review in the current era. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 72:278–285. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.21580
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Goo HW (2011) Cardiac MDCT in children: CT technology overview and interpretation. Radiol Clin North Am 49:997–1010. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcl.2011.06.001
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Leschka S, Oechslin E, Husmann L et al (2007) Pre- and postoperative evaluation of congenital heart disease in children and adults with 64-section CT. Radiographics 27:829–846. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.273065713
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Han BK, Lindberg J, Grant K, Schwartz RS, Lesser JR (2011) Accuracy and safety of high pitch computed tomography imaging in young children with complex congenital heart disease. Am J Cardiol 107:1541e1546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.01.065
Article
Google Scholar
Thomas KE, Wang B (2008) Age specific effective doses for pediatric MSCT examinations at a large children’s hospital using DLP conversion coefficients: a simple estimation method. Pediatr Radiol 38(6):645–656. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-008-0794-0
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
American Association of Physicists in Medicine (2008) The measure, reporting and management of radiation dose in CT. Report #96 of AAPM task Group 23 of the Diagnostic Imaging Council CT Committee, 2008
Orly Goitein Y, Salem J, Jacobson et al (2014) The role of cardiac computed tomography in infants with congenital heart disease. ISR Med Assoc J 16(3):147–5223
PubMed
Google Scholar
Ying Liu J, Li H et al (2016) Image quality and radiation dose of dual-source CT cardiac angiography using prospective ECG-triggering technique in pediatric patients with congenital heart disease. J Cardiothorac Surg 11:47. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-016-0460-9
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Weustink AC, Neefjes LA, Kyrzopoulos S et al (2009) Impact of heart rate frequency and variability on radiation exposure, image quality and diagnostic performance in dual-source spiral CT coronary angiography. Radiology 253:672–680. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2533090358
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Schicchi N, Fogante M, Esposto Pirani et al (2019) Third-generation dual-source dual-energy CT in pediatric congenital heart disease patients: state-of-the-art. Radiol Med 124:1238–1252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-019-01097-7
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Long CM, Long SS, Johnson PT, Mahesh M, Fishman EK, Zimmerman SL (2015) Utility of low-dose high-pitch scanning for pediatric cardiac computed tomography imaging. J Thorac Imaging 30(4):W36-40. https://doi.org/10.1097/RTI.0000000000000131
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Zheng M, Zhao H, Xu J, Wu Y, Li J (2013) Image quality of ultra-low-dose dual source CT angiography using high pitched spiral acquisition and iterative reconstruction in young children with congenital heart disease. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 7(6):376–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcct.2013.11.005
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Krishnamurthy R (2009) The role of MRI and CT in congenital heart disease. Pediatr Radiol 39:S196–S204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-009-1166-0
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Paul JF, Rohnean A, Sigal-Cinqualbre A (2010) Multidetector CT for congenital heart patients: what a pediatric radiologist should know. Pediatr Radiol 40:869–875. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-010-1614-x
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Hu XH, Huang GY, Pa M et al (2008) Multidetector CT angiography and 3D reconstruction in young children with coarctation of the aorta. Pediatr Cardiol 29:726–731. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-008-9226-z
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Cheng Z, Wang X, Duan Y et al (2010) Low-dose prospective ECG-triggering dual-source CT angiography in infants and children with complex congenital heart disease: first experience. Eur Radiol 20:2503–2511. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-010-1822-7
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Brenner DJ (2002) Estimating cancer risks from pediatric CT: going from the qualitative to the quantitative. Pediatr Radiol 32:228–233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-002-0671-1 (discussion 242–244)
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Brenner DJ, Elliston CD, Hall EJ, Berdon WE (2001) Estimates of the cancer risks from pediatric CT radiation are not merely theoretical: comment on “point/counterpoint: in X-ray computed tomography, technique factors should be selected appropriate to patient size against the proposition.” Med Phys 28:2387–23888. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.1415074
CAS
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Ait-Ali L, Andreassi MG, Foffa I, Spadoni I, Vano E, Picano E (2010) Cumulative patient effective dose and acute radiation-induced chromosomal DNA damage in children with congenital heart disease. Heart 96:269–274. https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.2008.160309
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Watson TG, Mah E, Schoepf UJ, King L, Huda W, Hlavacek AM (2013) Effective radiation dose in computed tomographic angiography of the chest and diagnostic cardiac catheterization in pediatric patients. Pediatr Cardiol 34(3):518–524. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-012-0486-2
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Meinel FG, Huda W, Schoepf UJ et al (2013) Diagnostic accuracy of CT angiography in infants with tetralogy of Fallot with pulmonary atresia and major aortopulmonary collateral arteries. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 7(6):367–375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcct.2013.11.001
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Booij R, Dijkshoorn ML, van Straten M et al (2016) Cardiovascular imaging in pediatric patients using dual source CT. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 10(1):13–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcct.2015.10.003
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Gao W, Zhong YM, Sun AM et al (2016) Diagnostic accuracy of sub mSv prospective ECG—triggering cardiac CT in young infant with complex congenital heart disease. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 32(6):991–998. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-016-0854-8
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar