Skip to main content
Log in

Normative values of cardiac chamber dimensions and global longitudinal strain in Indians: the Indian Normative Data of Echocardiography Analyzed (INDEA) study

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ethnic-specific normal reference ranges for various echocardiographic measurements are essential for accurate diagnostic interpretation and clinical decision-making. Unfortunately, such normative data for Indians is lacking. A total of 880 healthy volunteers (mean age 39.7 ± 12.3 years, 63.8% men) from six centers across different regions of India were enrolled in this study. Comprehensive transthoracic echocardiographic study was performed in all subjects, in accordance with the existing guideline recommendations. Cardiac chamber dimensions [Left ventricular (LV) end-diastolic diameter and volume; right ventricular (RV) basal diameter, left atrial volume] were obtained and indexed to body surface area. LV ejection fraction, LV global longitudinal strain (LVGLS) and measures of RV systolic function were also obtained. The subjects were divided into 3 age groups (35 years or less, 36–55 years and 56 years or above) for analysis. Age- and gender-specific reference values for various clinically relevant echocardiographic parameters were derived. Compared with women, men had larger cardiac chamber dimensions and volumes, but not when indexed. In contrast, the women had higher LV systolic function, but right ventricular systolic function was not different. The indexed LV volumes in our study were much smaller than those recommended in the American Society of Echocardiography (ASE)/European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI) 2015 chamber quantification guidelines but were similar to those reported in the Indian patients included in the recent World Alliance Societies of Echocardiography (WASE) Normal Values Study. LVGLS was also comparable with the WASE data. INDEA study is the first, multi-centric study to provide normal echocardiographic references values for Indian adults. Our findings underscore the need to follow India-specific reference values, instead of those recommended by the ASE/EACVI, which are largely applicable to the western populations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nishimura RA, Otto CM, Bonow RO et al (2017) 2017 AHA/ACC focused update of the 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 70:252–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Baumgartner H, Falk V, Bax JJ et al (2017) 2017 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease. Eur Heart J 38:2739–2791

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lang RM, Badano LP, Mor-Avi V et al (2015) Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 28:1–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ethnic-Specific Normative Reference Values for Echocardiographic LA and, Size LV (2015) Mass, and systolic function: the EchoNoRMAL study. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 8:656–665

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chahal NS, Lim TK, Jain P, Chambers JC, Kooner JS, Senior R (2010) Ethnicity-related differences in left ventricular function, structure and geometry: a population study of UK Indian Asian and European white subjects. Heart 96:466–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chahal NS, Lim TK, Jain P, Chambers JC, Kooner JS, Senior R (2012) Population-based reference values for 3D echocardiographic LV volumes and ejection fraction. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 5:1191–1197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Badano LP (2014) Ethnicity: a missing variable when defining normative values for reporting echocardiographic studies. Arch Cardiovasc Imaging 2:e16315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bansal M, Mohan JC, Sengupta SP (2016) Normal echocardiographic measurements in Indian adults: how different are we from the western populations? A pilot study. Indian Heart J 68:772–775

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Zabalgoitia M, Ur Rahman SN, Haley WE et al (1998) Impact of ethnicity on left ventricular mass and relative wall thickness in essential hypertension. Am J Cardiol 81:412–417

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Daimon M, Watanabe H, Abe Y et al (2008) Normal values of echocardiographic parameters in relation to age in a healthy Japanese population: the JAMP study. Circ J 72:1859–1866

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kawut SM, Lima JA, Barr RG et al (2011) Sex and race differences in right ventricular structure and function: the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis-right ventricle study. Circulation 123:2542–2551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Poppe KK, Doughty RN, Walsh HJ, Triggs CM, Whalley GA (2014) A comparison of the effects of indexation on standard echocardiographic measurements of the left heart in a healthy multi-racial population. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 30:749–758

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Asch FM, Miyoshi T, Addetia K et al (2019) Similarities and differences in left ventricular size and function among races and nationalities: results of the world alliance societies of echocardiography normal values study. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 32:1396–1406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Rudski LG, Lai WW, Afilalo J et al (2010) Guidelines for the echocardiographic assessment of the right heart in adults: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography endorsed by the European Association of Echocardiography, a registered branch of the European Society of Cardiology, and the Canadian Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 23:685–713 (quiz 786-8)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Burkule N, Bansal M, Mehrotra R, Venkateshvaran A (2017) Indian academy of echocardiography performance standards and recommendations for a comprehensive transthoracic echocardiographic study in adults. J Indian Acad Echocardiogr Cardiovasc Imaging 1:1–17

    Google Scholar 

  16. Haddad F, Hunt SA, Rosenthal DN, Murphy DJ (2008) Right ventricular function in cardiovascular disease, part I: anatomy, physiology, aging, and functional assessment of the right ventricle. Circulation 117:1436–1448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Jones N, Burns AT, Prior DL (2019) Echocardiographic assessment of the right ventricle-state of the art. Heart Lung Circ 28:1339–1350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Maffessanti F, Muraru D, Esposito R et al (2013) Age-, body size-, and sex-specific reference values for right ventricular volumes and ejection fraction by three-dimensional echocardiography: a multicenter echocardiographic study in 507 healthy volunteers. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 6:700–710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Dalen H, Thorstensen A, Vatten LJ, Aase SA, Stoylen A (2010) Reference values and distribution of conventional echocardiographic Doppler measures and longitudinal tissue Doppler velocities in a population free from cardiovascular disease. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 3:614–622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. D’Andrea A, Riegler L, Rucco MA et al (2013) Left atrial volume index in healthy subjects: clinical and echocardiographic correlates. Echocardiography 30:1001–1007

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Aurigemma GP, Gottdiener JS, Arnold AM, Chinali M, Hill JC, Kitzman D (2009) Left atrial volume and geometry in healthy aging: the Cardiovascular Health Study. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2:282–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Aune E, Baekkevar M, Roislien J, Rodevand O, Otterstad JE (2009) Normal reference ranges for left and right atrial volume indexes and ejection fractions obtained with real-time three-dimensional echocardiography. Eur J Echocardiogr 10:738–744

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Nagueh SF (2018) Classification of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction and heart failure diagnosis and prognosis. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 31:1209–1211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Sullere V, Jain D, Sullere S, Anthony C (2018) Global longitudinal strain, ejection fraction, effort tolerance and normal echocardiography measurements in healthy Indians. Indian Heart J 70:637–641

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ilercil A, O’Grady MJ, Roman MJ et al (2001) Reference values for echocardiographic measurements in urban and rural populations of differing ethnicity: the Strong Heart Study. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 14:601–611

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Yingchoncharoen T, Agarwal S, Popovic ZB, Marwick TH (2013) Normal ranges of left ventricular strain: a meta-analysis. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 26:185–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Gupta BB (2006) India through the ages. Niyogi Books, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shantanu P. Sengupta.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sengupta, S.P., Burkule, N., Bansal, M. et al. Normative values of cardiac chamber dimensions and global longitudinal strain in Indians: the Indian Normative Data of Echocardiography Analyzed (INDEA) study. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 37, 871–880 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-020-02060-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-020-02060-8

Keywords

Navigation