Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Validation of post-stenting fractional flow reserve with intravascular ultrasound parameters for optimal stent deployment

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We aimed to evaluate the relationship between post-stent fractional flow reserve (FFR) and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) parameters for stent optimization. IVUS and FFR measurements were performed in 101 coronary lesions after successful percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Quantitative IVUS parameters for stent optimization such as minimal intra-stent cross sectional area (CSA), proximal, and distal reference lumen CSA, and plaque burden (PB) at both edges of the stent related to the post-stent FFR. Mean post-stent FFR was 0.91 ± 0.06. Post-stent FFR ≤ 0.90 was observed in 46 (45.5%) lesions. The 55 lesions with post-stent FFR > 0.9 had larger proximal CSA (9.2 ± 2.9 mm2 vs. 7.4 ± 2.3 mm2, p = 0.001), distal reference lumen CSA (7.4 ± 2.7 mm2 vs. 6.3 ± 2.1 mm2, p = 0.017), minimum intra-stent lumen CSA (7.4 ± 2.5 mm2 vs. 6.1 ± 1.7 mm2, p = 0.004), and lower proximal reference PB (45 ± 8.2% vs. 50 ± 11%, p = 0.017) than did those with post-stent FFR ≤ 0.90. Post-stent FFR had an inverse correlation with age, left anterior descending artery (LAD) against non-LAD, and proximal reference PB and a positive correlation with pre-stent FFR, proximal and distal reference lumen CSA, and minimum intra-stent lumen CSA. Meanwhile, no correlation was found between post-stent FFR and stent length. Pre-stent FFR (β = 0.544), proximal reference lumen CSA (β = 0.530) and age (β = − 0.251) were found to be independently associated with the post-stent FFR. Post-procedural FFR might partly reflect the appropriateness of PCI results in terms of the adequate expansion of the stent and full lesion coverage on IVUS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pijls NH, De Bruyne B, Peels K, Van Der Voort PH, Bonnier HJ, Bartunek JKJJ et al (1996) Measurement of fractional flow reserve to assess the functional severity of coronary-artery stenoses. N Engl J Med 334:1703–1708

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Pijls NH, van Schaardenburgh P, Manoharan G, Boersma E, Bech JW, van’t Veer M et al (2007) Percutaneous coronary intervention of functionally nonsignificant stenosis: 5-year follow-up of the DEFER Study. J Am Coll Cardiol 49:2105–2111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Tonino PA, De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, Siebert U, Ikeno F, van’ t Veer M et al (2009) Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. N Engl J Med 360:213–224

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, Kalesan B, Barbato E, Tonino PA, Piroth Z et al (2012) Fractional flow reserve-guided PCI versus medical therapy in stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med 367:991–1001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Yoon HJ, Hur SH (2012) Optimization of stent deployment by intravascular ultrasound. Korean J Intern Med 27:30–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kang SJ, Lee JY, Ahn JM, Mintz GS, Kim WJ, Park DW et al (2011) Validation of intravascular ultrasound-derived parameters with fractional flow reserve for assessment of coronary stenosis severity. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 4:65–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Koo BK, Yang HM, Doh JH, Choe H, Lee SY, Yoon CH et al (2011) Optimal intravascular ultrasound criteria and their accuracy for defining the functional significance of intermediate coronary stenoses of different locations. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 4:803–811

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Mintz GS, Nissen SE, Anderson WD, Bailey SR, Erbel R, Fitzgerald PJ et al (2001) American College of Cardiology clinical expert consensus document on standards for acquisition, measurement and reporting of intravascular ultrasound studies (IVUS): A report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents. J Am Coll Cardiol 37:1478–1492

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Nam CW, Hur SH, Cho YK, Park HS, Yoon HJ, Kim H et al (2011) Relation of fractional flow reserve after drug-eluting stent implantation to one-year outcomes. Am J Cardiol 107:1763–1767

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Johnson NP, Toth GG, Lai D, Zhu H, Acar G, Agostoni P et al (2014) Prognostic value of fractional flow reserve: linking physiologic severity to clinical outcomes. J Am Coll Cardiol 64:1641–1654

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Li SJ, Ge Z, Kan J, Zhang JJ, Ye F, Kwan TW et al (2017) Cutoff value and long-term prediction of clinical events by ffr measured immediately after implantation of a drug-eluting stent in patients with coronary artery disease: 1- to 3-year results from the DKCRUSH VII Registry Study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 10:986–995

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Pijls NH, Klauss V, Siebert U, Powers E, Takazawa K, Fearon WF et al (2002) Coronary pressure measurement after stenting predicts adverse events at follow-up: a multicenter registry. Circulation 105:2950–2954

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Piroth Z, Toth GG, Tonino PAL, Barbato E, Aghlmandi S, Curzen N et al (2017) Prognostic value of fractional flow reserve measured immediately after drug-eluting stent implantation. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 10:e005233

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Samady H, McDaniel M, Veledar E, De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, Fearon WF et al (2009) Baseline fractional flow reserve and stent diameter predict optimal post-stent fractional flow reserve and major adverse cardiac events after bare-metal stent deployment. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2:357–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Fearon WF, Luna J, Samady H, Powers ER, Feldman T, Dib N et al (2001) Fractional flow reserve compared with intravascular ultrasound guidance for optimizing stent deployment. Circulation 104:1917–1922

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Baranauskas A, Peace A, Kibarskis A, Shannon J, Abraitis V, Bajoras V et al (2016) FFR result post PCI is suboptimal in long diffuse coronary artery disease. EuroIntervention 12:1473–1480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ito T, Tani T, Fujita H, Ohte N (2014) Relationship between fractional flow reserve and residual plaque volume and clinical outcomes after optimal drug-eluting stent implantation: insight from intravascular ultrasound volumetric analysis. Int J Cardiol 176:399–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Witzenbichler B, Maehara A, Weisz G, Neumann FJ, Rinaldi MJ, Metzger DC et al (2014) Relationship between intravascular ultrasound guidance and clinical outcomes after drug-eluting stents: the assessment of dual antiplatelet therapy with drug-eluting stents (ADAPT-DES) study. Circulation 129:463–470

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Jang JS, Song YJ, Kang W, Jin HY, Seo JS, Yang TH et al (2014) Intravascular ultrasound-guided implantation of drug-eluting stents to improve outcome: a meta-analysis. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 7:233–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ahn SG, Yoon J, Sung JK, Lee JH, Lee JW, Youn YJ et al (2013) Intravascular ultrasound-guided percutaneous coronary intervention improves the clinical outcome in patients undergoing multiple overlapping drug-eluting stents implantation. Korean Circ J 43:231–238

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Hong SJ, Kim BK, Shin DH, Nam CM, Kim JS, Ko YG et al (2015) Effect of intravascular ultrasound–guided vs angiography-guided everolimus-eluting stent implantation: the IVUS-XPL randomized clinical trial. JAMA 314:2155–2163

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Kim JS, Hong MK, Ko YG, Choi D, Yoon JH, Choi SH et al (2011) Impact of intravascular ultrasound guidance on long-term clinical outcomes in patients treated with drug-eluting stent for bifurcation lesions: data from a Korean multicenter bifurcation registry. Am Heart J 161:180–187

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Park SJ, Kim YH, Park DW, Lee SW, Kim WJ, Suh J et al (2009) Impact of intravascular ultrasound guidance on long-term mortality in stenting for unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2:167–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ahn SG, Suh J, Hung OY, Lee HS, Bouchi YH, Zeng W et al (2017) Discordance between fractional flow reserve and coronary flow reserve: insights from intracoronary imaging and physiological assessment. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 10:999–1007

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sung Gyun Ahn.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ahn, S.G., Hong, S., Son, JW. et al. Validation of post-stenting fractional flow reserve with intravascular ultrasound parameters for optimal stent deployment. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 36, 197–203 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-019-01712-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-019-01712-8

Keywords

Navigation