Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of aortic stiffness by a new simplified 2D speckle tracking analysis

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Arterial stiffness is a marker of cardiovascular damage and an independent predictor of major cardiovascular events, usually assessed via Carotid-Femoral Pulse Wave Velocity (cfPWV). The aim of this study was to test the feasibility and usefulness of aortic strain analysis using a simplified transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) speckle-tracking (ST) based method. 60 consecutive patients with normal blood pressure and aortic dimensions underwent TTE and cfPWV evaluation. Strain analysis was performed on the largest section of the ascending aorta (aA) with a dedicated software; three couples of speckles were identified within the anterior and posterior aortic wall and transverse segments connecting each couple traced. Peak ascending Aorta Strain (PaAS) was defined as the averaged peak percentage deformation of these segments during the cardiac cycle; aortic stiffness index β2 was defined as 100 × Ln(SBP/DBP)/PaAS. 17 patients were excluded for suboptimal TTE images. In the 43 analyzed individuals (male 58%, age 63 years) PaAS was 5.5 [3.7–8.6] % with excellent inter and intra observer reproducibility (ICC 95% for both). PaAS showed significant correlation with age (r = − 0.64), aA diameter (r = − 0.45), cfPWV (r = − 0.41), stroke volume (r = − 0.41) and heart rate (r = − 0.49). Age remained the only independent determinant of PaAS in a multivariate analysis. β2 (10.8 [5.9–15.0]) showed significant direct correlation with age, Pulse pressure, aA diameter and cfPWV. A simplified strain analysis of the ascending aorta is technically feasible with good reproducibility; PaAS and β2 index correlate well with established parameters of arterial stiffness and might represent a new index in evaluating vascular biomechanics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

aA:

Ascending aorta

cfPWV:

Carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity

PaAS:

Peak ascending aorta strain

ST:

Speckle tracking

TTE:

Transthoracic echocardiography

References

  1. Milan A et al (2011) Arterial stiffness: from physiology to clinical implications. High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev 18:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cheng S et al (2010) Correlates of echocardiographic indices of cardiac remodeling over the adult life course: longitudinal observations from the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation 122:570–578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Pluta A et al (2015) Left ventricular remodeling and arterial remodeling in patients with chronic kidney disease stage 1–3. Ren Fail 37:1105–1110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Laurent S et al (2006) Expert consensus document on arterial stiffness: methodological issues and clinical applications. Eur Heart J 27:2588–2605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bruno RM et al (2017) Carotid and aortic stiffness in essential hypertension and their relation with target organ damage: the CATOD study. J Hypertens 35:310–318

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Chirinos JA et al (2012) Arterial stiffness: basic concepts and measurement techniques. J Cardiovasc Transl Res 5:243–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ecobici M, Voiculescu M (2017) Importance of arterial stiffness in predicting cardiovascular events. Rom J Intern Med 55:8–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Mancia G et al (2013) 2013 Practice guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and the European Society of Cardiology (ESC): ESH/ESC Task Force for the Management of Arterial Hypertension. J Hypertens 31:1925–1938

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Lang RM et al (2015) Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults:an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 28:1–39.e14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Townsend RR et al (2017) Arterial stiffness: recommendations and standardization. Pulse (Basel) 4:3–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cavalcante JL et al (2011) Aortic stiffness: current understanding and future directions. J Am Coll Cardiol 57:1511–1522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Weber T et al (2009) Noninvasive determination of carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity depends critically on assessment of travel distance: a comparison with invasive measurement. J Hypertens 27:1624–1630

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Cho JY et al (2016) Evaluation of arterial stiffness by echocardiography: methodological aspects. Chonnam Med J 52:101–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Tosello F et al (2016) Out of proportion proximal aortic remodeling: a subclinical marker of early vascular ageing? A systematic review. Int J Cardiol 223:999–1006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Safar ME et al (2010) Arterial aging–hemodynamic changes and therapeutic options. Nat Rev Cardiol 7:442–449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Milan A et al (2013) Ascending aortic dilatation, arterial stiffness and cardiac organ damage in essential hypertension. J Hypertens 31:109–116

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Vlachopoulos C et al (2010) Prediction of cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality with arterial stiffness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 55:1318–1327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Davies JI et al (2003) Pulse wave analysis and pulse wave velocity: a critical review of their strengths and weaknesses. J Hypertens 21:463–472

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Morrison TM et al (2009) Circumferential and longitudinal cyclic strain of the human thoracic aorta: age-related changes. J Vasc Surg 49:1029–1036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Redheuil A et al (2010) Reduced ascending aortic strain and distensibility: earliest manifestations of vascular aging in humans. Hypertension 55:319–326

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Cuspidi C et al (2015) How to identify hypertensive patients at high cardiovascular risk? The role of echocardiography. High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev 22:113–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Vogt S et al (2016) Detailed measurement of wall strain with 3D speckle tracking in the aortic root: a case of bionic support for clinical decision making. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Rep 5:77–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Li Y et al (2016) Evaluation of myocardial strain and artery elasticity using speckle tracking echocardiography and high-resolution ultrasound in patients with bicuspid aortic valve. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 32:1063–1069

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Geyer H et al (2010) Assessment of myocardial mechanics using speckle tracking echocardiography: fundamentals and clinical applications. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 23:351–369 (quiz 453–355)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Oishi Y et al (2008) A novel approach to assess aortic stiffness related to changes in aging using a two-dimensional strain imaging. Echocardiography 25:941–945

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kim KH et al (2009) Usefulness of aortic strain analysis by velocity vector imaging as a new echocardiographic measure of arterial stiffness. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 22:1382–1388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Teixeira R et al (2015) Circumferential vascular strain rate to estimate vascular load in aortic stenosis: a speckle tracking echocardiography study. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 31:681–689

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Fritze O et al (2012) Age-related changes in the elastic tissue of the human aorta. J Vasc Res 49:77–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Honda T, Yano K et al (1994) Evaluation of aortic distensibility in patients with essential hypertension by using cine magnetic resonance imaging. Angiology 45:207–212

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Donato Aquaro G et al (2011) Elastic properties of aortic wall in patients with bicuspid aortic valve by magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Cardiol 108:81–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. O’Rourke MF (2007) Arterial aging: pathophysiological principles. Vasc Med 12:329–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Tomiyama H et al (2018) Longitudinal association among endothelial function, arterial stiffness and subclinical organ damage in hypertension. Int J Cardiol 253:161–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Safar ME (2018) Arterial stiffness as a risk factor for clinical hypertension. Nat Rev Cardiol 15:97–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Azadani AN et al (2012) Comparison of mechanical properties of human ascending aorta and aortic sinuses. Ann Thorac Surg 93:87–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Van Bortel LM et al (2012) Expert consensus document on the measurement of aortic stiffness in daily practice using carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity. J Hypertens 30:445–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alberto Milan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sabia, L., Avenatti, E., Cesareo, M. et al. Evaluation of aortic stiffness by a new simplified 2D speckle tracking analysis. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 34, 1753–1760 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-018-1400-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-018-1400-7

Keywords

Navigation