Advertisement

Functional classification of aortic regurgitation using cardiac computed tomography: comparison with surgical inspection

  • Hyun Jung Koo
  • Joon-Won Kang
  • Jeong A Kim
  • Joon Bum Kim
  • Sung-Ho Jung
  • Suk Jung Choo
  • Cheol Hyun Chung
  • Jae Won Lee
  • Tae-Hwan Lim
  • Dong Hyun Yang
Original Paper

Abstract

In patients with aortic regurgitation (AR), a precise preoperative assessment of aortic valve (AV) pathology is important if AV repair or sparing operation is an alternative option. The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography (CT) for evaluating the AR mechanism compared with surgical inspection. 59 patients with AR who underwent AV surgery and preoperative cardiac CT were evaluated. AR mechanism was classified into type 1 (aortic dilatation or cusp perforation), type 2 (prolapsed cusp) and type 3 (cusp retraction). Agreement between CT and surgical inspection was obtained. Correlation between aortic regurgitant orifice (ARO) and imaging parameters were evaluated. On surgical inspection, type 1 AR was noted in 22 patients, type 2 in 16 and type 3 in 21. Agreement regarding the AR mechanism on CT was excellent (intra-class correlation coefficient, 0.81). At the patient level, the Cohen’s κ value for CT findings with surgical inspection was of 0.89. At the cusp level, moderate agreement was noted between CT and surgical inspection. In the per-cusp analysis, CT had a sensitivity of 72.6%, specificity of 85.1%, positive predictive value of 73.8% and negative predictive value of 84.3% for the detection of aortic cusp abnormality. The diameter, perimeter and area of aortic annulus had moderate correlation with ARO (r = 0.54–0.66, P < 0.001). CT-derived classification of AR mechanism showed excellent agreement with surgical inspection.

Keywords

Aortic valve Aortic regurgitation Computed tomography Aortic valve repair Aortic valve replacement 

Abbreviations

AR

Aortic regurgitation

ARO

Aortic regurgitation orifice

AV

Aortic valve

AVR

Aortic valve replacement

CI

Confidence interval

CT

Computed tomography

LV

Left ventricle

ICC

Intra-class correlation coefficient

TEE

Transesophageal echocardiography

Notes

Funding

This work was supported by National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grants funded by the Korean government (MSIP) (NRF-2016R1A1A1A05921207 and NRF-2015R1A2A2A04003034) and by a Grant (2017-7208) from the Asan Institute for Life Sciences, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea. This work was also funded by the Industrial Strategic technology development program (10072064) of the Ministry of Trade Industry and Energy of Korea. The content of this study is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not represent the official views of the funding sources, and the funding sources had no involvement in this study.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Disclosure

The authors have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.

Supplementary material

10554_2018_1341_MOESM1_ESM.tif (7 mb)
Supplementary Fig. 1. Measurement of aortic regurgitant orifice and perpendicular image of the aortic valve in-plane view. (A) A 63-year-old female with an aortic valve operation planned because of severe central aortic regurgitation. The yellow line indicates 5-mm image slice thickness to obtain the aortic valve in-plane view in (B). (B) In the centre of three partial prolapsed aortic cusps, the aortic regurgitant orifice (red area inside the red dotted line, 65 mm2) is noted during the closing of the aortic valve at the end-diastolic phase of the heart. (C) From the aortic valve in-plane view obtained with a 1-mm slice thickness image, the perpendicular plane of the red dotted line through the aorta to the left ventricle direction was obtained as (D). (D) In this plane, prolapsed aortic cusps are well demonstrated. Ao, ascending aorta; LA, left atrium; LV, left ventricle; PA, pulmonary artery. (TIF 7187 KB)
10554_2018_1341_MOESM2_ESM.docx (16 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (DOCX 15 KB)

References

  1. 1.
    de Kerchove L, Glineur D, Poncelet A, Boodhwani M, Rubay J, Dhoore W, Noirhomme P, El Khoury G (2008) Repair of aortic leaflet prolapse: a ten-year experience. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 34:785–791CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    de Kerchove L, Boodhwani M, Glineur D, Poncelet A, Rubay J, Watremez C, Vanoverschelde JL, Noirhomme P, El Khoury G (2009) Cusp prolapse repair in trileaflet aortic valves: free margin plication and free margin resuspension techniques. Ann Thorac Surg 88:455–461 (discussion 461)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Boodhwani M, de Kerchove L, Glineur D, Rubay J, Vanoverschelde JL, Noirhomme P, El Khoury G (2010) Repair of regurgitant bicuspid aortic valves: a systematic approach. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 140:276–284CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Schafers HJ, Aicher D, Langer F (2002) Correction of leaflet prolapse in valve-preserving aortic replacement: pushing the limits? Ann Thorac Surg 74:S1762–S1764 (discussion S1792–S1769)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Minakata K, Schaff HV, Zehr KJ, Dearani JA, Daly RC, Orszulak TA, Puga FJ, Danielson GK (2004) Is repair of aortic valve regurgitation a safe alternative to valve replacement? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 127:645–653CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Langer F, Graeter T, Nikoloudakis N, Aicher D, Wendler O, Schafers HJ (2001) Valve-preserving aortic replacement: does the additional repair of leaflet prolapse adversely affect the results? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 122:270–277CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    El Khoury G, Vanoverschelde JL, Glineur D, Poncelet A, Verhelst R, Astarci P, Underwood MJ, Noirhomme P (2004) Repair of aortic valve prolapse: experience with 44 patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 26:628–633CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    El Khoury G, Vanoverschelde JL, Glineur D, Pierard F, Verhelst RR, Rubay J, Funken JC, Watremez C, Astarci P, Lacroix V, Poncelet A, Noirhomme P (2006) Repair of bicuspid aortic valves in patients with aortic regurgitation. Circulation 114:I610–I616CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Langer F, Aicher D, Kissinger A, Wendler O, Lausberg H, Fries R, Schafers HJ (2004) Aortic valve repair using a differentiated surgical strategy. Circulation 110:Ii67–Ii73CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Aicher D, Fries R, Rodionycheva S, Schmidt K, Langer F, Schafers HJ (2010) Aortic valve repair leads to a low incidence of valve-related complications. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 37:127–132CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Price J, De Kerchove L, Glineur D, Vanoverschelde JL, Noirhomme P, El Khoury G (2013) Risk of valve-related events after aortic valve repair. Ann Thorac Surg 95:606–612 (discussion 613)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Saczkowski R, Malas T, de Kerchove L, El Khoury G, Boodhwani M (2013) Systematic review of aortic valve preservation and repair. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 2:3–9PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    le Polain de Waroux JB, Pouleur AC, Goffinet C, Vancraeynest D, Van Dyck M, Robert A, Gerber BL, Pasquet A, El Khoury G, Vanoverschelde JL (2007) Functional anatomy of aortic regurgitation: accuracy, prediction of surgical repairability, and outcome implications of transesophageal echocardiography. Circulation 116:I264–I269CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Boodhwani M, de Kerchove L, Glineur D, Poncelet A, Rubay J, Astarci P, Verhelst R, Noirhomme P, El Khoury G (2009) Repair-oriented classification of aortic insufficiency: impact on surgical techniques and clinical outcomes. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 137:286–294CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    El Khoury G, Glineur D, Rubay J, Verhelst R, d’Acoz Y, Poncelet A, Astarci P, Noirhomme P, van Dyck M (2005) Functional classification of aortic root/valve abnormalities and their correlation with etiologies and surgical procedures. Curr Opin Cardiol 20:115–121CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kim DH, Handschumacher MD, Levine RA, Sun BJ, Jang JY, Yang DH, Kang JW, Song JM, Kang DH, Lim TH, Song JK (2014) Aortic valve adaptation to aortic root dilatation: insights into the mechanism of functional aortic regurgitation from 3-dimensional cardiac computed tomography. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 7:828–835CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kang JW, Song HG, Yang DH, Baek S, Kim DH, Song JM, Kang DH, Lim TH, Song JK (2013) Association between bicuspid aortic valve phenotype and patterns of valvular dysfunction and bicuspid aortopathy: comprehensive evaluation using MDCT and echocardiography. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 6:150–161CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bennett CJ, Maleszewski JJ, Araoz PA (2012) CT and MR imaging of the aortic valve: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics 32:1399–1420CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Beck KS, Kim J, Choe YH, Hian SK, Hoe J, Hong YJ et al (2017) 2017 multimodality appropriate use criteria for noninvasive cardiac imaging: expert consensus of the Asian society of cardiovascular imaging. Cardiovasc Imaging Asia 1:156–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kim YJ, Yong HS, Kim SM, Kim JA, Yang DH, Hong YJ (2015) Korean guidelines for the appropriate use of cardiac CT. Korean J Radiol 16:251–285CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tsai IC, Choi BW, Chan C, Jinzaki M, Kitagawa K, Yong HS, Yu W (2010) ASCI 2010 appropriateness criteria for cardiac computed tomography: a report of the Asian Society of Cardiovascular Imaging Cardiac Computed Tomography and Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging Guideline Working Group. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 26(Suppl 1):1–15CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Nishimura RA, Otto CM, Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Erwin JP 3rd, Fleisher LA, Jneid H, Mack MJ, McLeod CJ, O’Gara PT, Rigolin VH, Sundt TM 3rd, Thompson A (2017) 2017 AHA/ACC focused update of the 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 70:252–289CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lu TL, Huber CH, Rizzo E, Dehmeshki J, von Segesser LK, Qanadli SD (2009) Ascending aorta measurements as assessed by ECG-gated multi-detector computed tomography: a pilot study to establish normative values for transcatheter therapies. Eur Radiol 19:664–669CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sievers HH, Schmidtke C (2007) A classification system for the bicuspid aortic valve from 304 surgical specimens. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 133:1226–1233CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lansac E, Di Centa I, Raoux F, Al Attar N, Acar C, Joudinaud T, Raffoul R (2008) A lesional classification to standardize surgical management of aortic insufficiency towards valve repair. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 33:872–878 (discussion 878–880)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Haydar HS, He GW, Hovaguimian H, McIrvin DM, King DH, Starr A (1997) Valve repair for aortic insufficiency: surgical classification and techniques. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 11:258–265CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Jeanmart H, de Kerchove L, Glineur D, Goffinet JM, Rougui I, Van Dyck M, Noirhomme P, El Khoury G (2007) Aortic valve repair: the functional approach to leaflet prolapse and valve-sparing surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 83:S746–S751 (discussion S785–S790)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Lee JC, Branch KR, Hamilton-Craig C, Krieger EV (2018) Evaluation of aortic regurgitation with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: a systematic review. Heart 104:103–110CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hyun Jung Koo
    • 1
  • Joon-Won Kang
    • 1
  • Jeong A Kim
    • 2
  • Joon Bum Kim
    • 3
  • Sung-Ho Jung
    • 3
  • Suk Jung Choo
    • 3
  • Cheol Hyun Chung
    • 3
  • Jae Won Lee
    • 3
  • Tae-Hwan Lim
    • 1
  • Dong Hyun Yang
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Cardiac Imaging Center, Asan Medical CenterUniversity of Ulsan College of MedicineSeoulRepublic of Korea
  2. 2.Department of Radiology, Ilsan Paik HospitalInje University College of MedicineGoyangRepublic of Korea
  3. 3.Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Cardiac Imaging Center, Asan Medical CenterUniversity of Ulsan College of MedicineSeoulRepublic of Korea

Personalised recommendations