Advertisement

Implication of coronary CT angiography combined with four-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography for predicting major adverse cardiac events

  • Xiaohua Yin
  • Rong Xu
  • Yingchun Wang
  • Tao Cheng
  • Hui Zhou
Original Paper

Abstract

Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) can provide abundant information about the anatomy of the coronary artery. However, this modality is limited in evaluation of myocardial function. Four-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography (4DSTE) is a novel and sensitive technique for quantitative evaluation of myocardial deformation. We estimated the value of these imaging modalities to predict the risk of MACE in 209 patients with suspected coronary artery disease(CAD) after a median follow-up of 727 days. Three models were established: (1) CCTA alone, (2) CCTA combined with 4DSTE, and (3) CCTA combined with 4DSTE and clinical risk factors. Forty-six (22.0%) patients developed MACE. The hazard ratio (HR) of CCTA classification to predict the risk of MACE was greater (HR = 4.86) than for other parameters, including B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) (HR = 2.44) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (HR = 0.40). The area under the curve of models 2 and 3 to predict MACE was significantly greater than that of model 1 (0.92 and 0.93 vs. 0.84, respectively, p < 0.001). We conclude that there is direct relationship between CCTA classification and MACE risk. CCTA combined with 4DSTE can improve the ability of CCTA to predict the risk of MACE. This approach provides cardiologists a noninvasive, objective, and efficient method to predict MACE.

Keywords

Coronary computed tomography angiography Four-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography Risk factors Major adverse cardiac events Atherosclerotic plaque 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank participants and coordinators in the study, including Dr. Xuedong Shen and Dr. Ben He from Renji Hospital, Medical School of Shanghai Jiao-Tong University in China. We also thank Bracco Sine Pharmaceutical Corp. Ltd. and LetPub (http://www.letpub.com) for its linguistic assistance during the preparation of this manuscript.

Funding

The study received a research grant from Shanghai Municipal Commission of Health and Family Planning for Scientific Research projects in China (Grant No. 201440598) and Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Commission guidance project in China (Grant No. 134119b2300).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    He B, Gai L, Gai J, Qiao H, Zhang S, Guan Z, Yang L, Chen Y (2013) Correlation between major adverse cardiac events and coronary plaque characteristics. Exp Clin Cardiol 18:e71–e76.  https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2012-302920j.46 Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Yusuf S, Hawken S, Ounpuu S, Dans T, Avezum A, Lanas F, McQueen M, Budaj A, Pais P, Varigos J, Lisheng L (2004) Effect of potentially modifiable risk factors associated with myocardial infarction in 52 countries (the INTERHEART study): case-control study. Lancet 364:937–952.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17018-9 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Schneer S, Bachar GN, Atar E, Koronowski R, Dicker D (2013) Evaluation of framingham and systematic coronary risk evaluation scores by coronary computed tomographic angiography in asymptomatic adults. Am J Cardio 111:700–704.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.11.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Correia LC, Garcia G, Kalil F, Ferreira F, Carvalhal M, Oliveira R, Silva A, Vasconcelos I, Henri C, Noya-Rabelo M (2014) Prognostic value of TIMI score versus GRACE score in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Arq Bras Cardiol 103:98–106.  https://doi.org/10.5935/abc.20140095 PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Raposeiras-Roubín S, Abu-Assi E, López-López A, Bouzas-Cruz N, Castiñeira-Busto M, Cambeiro-González C, Álvarez-Álvarez B, Virgós-Lamela A, Varela-Román A, García-Acuña JM, González-Juanatey JR (2015) Risk stratification for the development of heart failure after acute coronary syndrome at the time of hospital discharge: predictive ability of GRACE risk score. J Cardiol 66:224–231.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjcc.2014.12.015 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Brindle P, Emberson J, Lampe F, Walker M, Whincup P, Fahey T, Ebrahim S (2003) Predictive accuracy of the Framingham coronary risk score in British men: prospective cohort study. BMJ 327:1267.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7426.1267 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Krittayaphong R, Boonyasirinant T, Saiviroonporn P, Thanapiboonpol P, Nakyen S, Udompunturak S (2008) Correlation between NT-pro BNP grades and left ventricular wall stress, sphericity index and extent of myocardial damage: a magnetic resonance imaging study. J Card Fail 14:687–694.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cardfail.2008.05.002 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Raja S, Mittal BR, Santhosh S, Bhattacharya A, Rohit MK (2014) Comparison of LVEF assessed by 2D echocardiography, gated blood pool SPECT, 99mTc tetrofosmin gated SPECT, and 18F-FDG gated PET with ERNV in patients with CAD and severe LV dysfunction. Nucl Med Commun 35:1156–1161.  https://doi.org/10.1097/MNM.0000000000000182 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Thalji NM, Suri RM, Daly RC, Dearani JA, Burkhart HM, Park SJ, Greason KL, Joyce LD, Stulak JM, Huebner M, Li Z, Frye RL, Schaff HV (2013) Assessment of coronary artery disease risk in 5463 patients undergoing cardiac surgery: when is preoperative coronary angiography necessary? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 146:1055–1063.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.06.0461064.e1.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Weber MA (2013) Cost efficiency analysis of CT coronary angiography for exclusion of significant coronary artery stenosis: comparison with conventional invasive coronary angiography before cardiac surgery. Radiologe 53:752–754.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00117-013-2564-8 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Orta Kilickesmez K, Baydar O, Bostan C, Coskun U, Kucukoglu S (2015) Four-Dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Echocardiography 32:1547–1553.  https://doi.org/10.1111/echo.12916 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gensini GG (1983) A more meaningful scoring system for determining the severity of coronary heart disease. Am J Cardiol 51:606.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9149(83)80105-2 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cerqueira MD, Weissman NJ, Dilsizian V, Jacobs AK, Kaul S, Laskey WK, Pennell DJ, Rumberger JA, Ryan T, Verani MS; American Heart Association Writing Group on Myocardial Segmentationand Registration for Cardiac Imaging (2002) Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart: a statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association. Circulation 105:539–542.  https://doi.org/10.1067/mje.2002.123374 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cantoni V, Green R, Acampa W, Petretta M, Bonaduce D, Salvatore M, Cuocolo A (2016) Long-term prognostic value of stress myocardial perfusion imaging and coronary computed tomography angiography: a meta-analysis. J Nucl Cardiol 23:185–197.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-015-0349-3 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Min JK, Dunning A, Lin FY, Achenbach S, Al-Mallah M, Budoff MJ, Cademartiri F, Callister TQ, Chang HJ, Cheng V, Chinnaiyan K, Chow BJ, Delago A, Hadamitzky M, Hausleiter J, Kaufmann P, Maffei E, Raff G, Shaw LJ, Villines T, Berman DS, CONFIRM Investigators (2011) Age- and sex-related differences in all-cause mortality risk based on coronary computed tomography angiography findings. J Am Coll Cardiol 58: 849–860.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2011.02.074 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Miller JM, Rochitte CE, Dewey M, Arbab-Zadeh A, Niinuma H, Gottlieb I, Paul N, Clouse ME, Shapiro EP, Hoe J, Lardo AC, Bush DE, de Roos A, Cox C, Brinker J, Lima JA (2008) Diagnostic performance of coronary angiography by 64-Row CT. N Engl J Me 359: 2324–2336.  https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0806576 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Abdulla J, Asferg C, Kofoed KF (2011) Prognostic value of absence or presence of coronary artery disease determined by 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 27:413–420.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-010-9652-x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Schlett CL, Banerji D, Siegel E, Bamberg F, Lehman SJ, Ferencik M, Brady TJ, Nagurney JT, Hoffmann U, Truong QA (2011) Prognostic value of CT angiography for major adverse cardiac events in patients with acute chest pain from the emergency department: 2-year outcomes of the ROMICAT trial. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 4:481–491.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2010.12.008 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bergerot C, Mewton N, Lacote-Roiron C, Ernande L, Ovize M, Croisille P, Thibault H, Derumeaux G (2014) Influence of microvascular obstruction on regional myocardial deformation in the acute phase of myocardial infarction: a speckle-tracking echocardiography study. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 27:93–100.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2013.09.011 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Reant P, Barbot L, Touche C, Dijos M, Arsac F, Pillois X, Landelle M, Roudaut R, Lafitte S (2012) Evaluation of global left ventricular systolic function using three-dimensional echocardiography speckle-tracking strain parameters. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 25:68–79.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2011.10.009 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Montgomery DE, Puthumana JJ, Fox JM, Ogunyankin KO (2012) Global longitudinal strain aids the detection of non-obstructive coronary artery disease in the resting echocardiogram. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 13:579–587.  https://doi.org/10.1093/ejechocard/jer282 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of RadiologyJiading Central HospitalShanghaiPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Department of UltrasoundJiading Central HospitalShanghaiPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations