Age-related changes in morphology of left atrial appendage in patients with atrial fibrillation

  • Yukina Hirata
  • Kenya Kusunose
  • Hirotsugu Yamada
  • Rikuto Shimizu
  • Yuta Torii
  • Susumu Nishio
  • Yoshihito Saijo
  • Shoichiro Takao
  • Takeshi Soeki
  • Masataka Sata
Original Paper

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between age and frequency of left atrial appendage (LAA) morphology in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) compared with sinus rhythm (SR). We enrolled 145 AF patients, and 199 SR patients for the control group without any cardiovascular disease. LAA volume index (LAAVi) and morphology were assessed by electrocardiogram-gated computed tomography angiography. LAA morphology was classified into “chicken wing” or “non-chicken wing” according to the previously described classification. There was no significant trend in frequency of non-chicken wing morphology among ages in the SR group (p = 0.36 for trend), whereas the frequency was negatively related to age in the AF group (p = 0.002 for trend). In multivariable logistic regression, age > 65 (odds ratio [OR] 0.42, p = 0.002) and duration of AF (OR 0.53, p = 0.010) and LAAVi (OR 0.62, p = 0.017) were independent factors of non-chicken wing LAA morphology in the AF group. LAA morphology is affected by age, especially in patients with AF. When we utilize non-chicken wing LAA morphology as a stroke risk factor in patients with AF, we should pay attention to their age.

Keywords

Left atrial appendage Atrial fibrillation Age Electrocardiogram-gated computed tomography angiography 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the expert work of the staff in our Radiological technician, as well as the staff in the Ultrasound Examination Center, Tokushima University Hospital. This study was supported by the Japanese Society of Sonographers Grant. M. Sata received research funding from Takeda, Tanabe-Mitsubishi, Astellas, Daiichi-Sankyo, MSD, Bayer Healthcare, and Ono, and honoraria from Takeda, Boehringer Ingelheim, Byer Healthcare, Mochida, Astellas, Tanabe-Mitsubishi, Novartis, AstraZeneca, MSD, and Shionogi.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

10554_2017_1232_MOESM1_ESM.pptx (47 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PPTX 47 KB)

References

  1. 1.
    Al-Saady NM, Obel OA, Camm AJ (1999) Left atrial appendage: structure, function, and role in thromboembolism. Heart 82(5):547–554CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Beinart R, Heist EK, Newell JB, Holmvang G, Ruskin JN, Mansour M (2011) Left atrial appendage dimensions predict the risk of stroke/TIA in patients with atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 22(1):10–15. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2010.01854.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Khurram IM, Dewire J, Mager M, Maqbool F, Zimmerman SL, Zipunnikov V, Beinart R, Marine JE, Spragg DD, Berger RD, Ashikaga H, Nazarian S, Calkins H (2013) Relationship between left atrial appendage morphology and stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation. Heart rhythm 10(12):1843–1849. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2013.09.065 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Taina M, Sipola P, Muuronen A, Hedman M, Mustonen P, Kantanen AM, Jakala P, Vanninen R (2014) Determinants of left atrial appendage volume in stroke patients without chronic atrial fibrillation. PLoS ONE 9(3):e90903. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0090903 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Korhonen M, Muuronen A, Arponen O, Mustonen P, Hedman M, Jakala P, Vanninen R, Taina M (2015) Left atrial appendage morphology in patients with suspected cardiogenic stroke without known atrial fibrillation. PLoS ONE 10(3):e0118822. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0118822 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lee JM, Seo J, Uhm JS, Kim YJ, Lee HJ, Kim JY, Sung JH, Pak HN, Lee MH, Joung B (2015) Why is left atrial appendage morphology related to strokes? An analysis of the flow velocity and orifice size of the left atrial appendage. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. doi: 10.1111/jce.12710 Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Di Biase L, Santangeli P, Anselmino M, Mohanty P, Salvetti I, Gili S, Horton R, Sanchez JE, Bai R, Mohanty S, Pump A, Cereceda Brantes M, Gallinghouse GJ, Burkhardt JD, Cesarani F, Scaglione M, Natale A, Gaita F (2012) Does the left atrial appendage morphology correlate with the risk of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation? Results from a multicenter study. J Am Coll Cardiol 60(6):531–538. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.04.032 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Koplay M, Erol C, Paksoy Y, Kivrak AS, Ozbek S (2012) An investigation of the anatomical variations of left atrial appendage by multidetector computed tomographic coronary angiography. Eur J Radiol 81(7):1575–1580. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.04.060 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kimura T, Takatsuki S, Inagawa K, Katsumata Y, Nishiyama T, Nishiyama N, Fukumoto K, Aizawa Y, Tanimoto Y, Tanimoto K, Jinzaki M, Fukuda K (2013) Anatomical characteristics of the left atrial appendage in cardiogenic stroke with low CHADS2 scores. Heart rhythm 10(6):921–925. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2013.01.036 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pan NH, Tsao HM, Chang NC, Chen YJ, Chen SA (2008) Aging dilates atrium and pulmonary veins: implications for the genesis of atrial fibrillation. Chest 133(1):190–196. doi: 10.1378/chest.07-1769 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chen CH, Nakayama M, Nevo E, Fetics BJ, Maughan WL, Kass DA (1998) Coupled systolic-ventricular and vascular stiffening with age: implications for pressure regulation and cardiac reserve in the elderly. J Am Coll Cardiol 32(5):1221–1227CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yoshida K, Ulfarsson M, Oral H, Crawford T, Good E, Jongnarangsin K, Bogun F, Pelosi F, Jalife J, Morady F, Chugh A (2011) Left atrial pressure and dominant frequency of atrial fibrillation in humans. Heart rhythm 8(2):181–187. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2010.10.030 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wang Y, Di Biase L, Horton RP, Nguyen T, Morhanty P, Natale A (2010) Left atrial appendage studied by computed tomography to help planning for appendage closure device placement. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 21(9):973–982. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2010.01814.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lang RM, Bierig M, Devereux RB, Flachskampf FA, Foster E, Pellikka PA, Picard MH, Roman MJ, Seward J, Shanewise JS, Solomon SD, Spencer KT, Sutton MS, Stewart WJ, Chamber Quantification Writing Group, American Society of Echocardiography’s Group, Standards Committee, European Association of Echocardiography (2005) Recommendations for chamber quantification: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography’s Guidelines and Standards Committee and the Chamber Quantification Writing Group, developed in conjunction with the European Association of Echocardiography, a branch of the European Society of Cardiology. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 18(12):1440–1463. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2005.10.005 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33(1):159–174CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Blackshear JL, Odell JA (1996) Appendage obliteration to reduce stroke in cardiac surgical patients with atrial fibrillation. Ann Thorac Surg 61(2):755–759. doi: 10.1016/0003-4975(95)00887-X CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Nedios S, Koutalas E, Kornej J, Rolf S, Arya A, Sommer P, Husser D, Hindricks G, Bollmann A (2015) Cardiogenic stroke despite low CHA2 DS2-VASc score: assessing stroke risk by left atrial appendage anatomy (ASK LAA). J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. doi: 10.1111/jce.12749 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Saito T, Tamura K, Uchida D, Saito T, Togashi M, Nitta T, Sugisaki Y (2007) Histopathological features of the resected left atrial appendage as predictors of recurrence after surgery for atrial fibrillation in valvular heart disease. Circ J 71(1):70–78CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Veinot JP, Harrity PJ, Gentile F, Khandheria BK, Bailey KR, Eickholt JT, Seward JB, Tajik AJ, Edwards WD (1997) Anatomy of the normal left atrial appendage: a quantitative study of age-related changes in 500 autopsy hearts: implications for echocardiographic examination. Circulation 96(9):3112–3115CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Christiaens L, Varroud-Vial N, Ardilouze P, Ragot S, Mergy J, Bonnet B, Herpin D, Allal J (2010) Real three-dimensional assessment of left atrial and left atrial appendage volumes by 64-slice spiral computed tomography in individuals with or without cardiovascular disease. Int J Cardiol 140(2):189–196. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2008.11.055 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Park J, Joung B, Uhm JS, Young Shim C, Hwang C, Hyoung Lee M, Pak HN (2014) High left atrial pressures are associated with advanced electroanatomical remodeling of left atrium and independent predictors for clinical recurrence of atrial fibrillation after catheter ablation. Heart Rhythm 11(6):953–960. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2014.03.009 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Shirani J, Alaeddini J (2000) Structural remodeling of the left atrial appendage in patients with chronic non-valvular atrial fibrillation: implications for thrombus formation, systemic embolism, and assessment by transesophageal echocardiography. Cardiovasc Pathol 9(2):95–101CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rich MW, Chyun DA, Skolnick AH, Alexander KP, Forman DE, Kitzman DW, Maurer MS, McClurken JB, Resnick BM, Shen WK, Tirschwell DL (2016) Knowledge gaps in cardiovascular care of the older adult population: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association, American College of Cardiology, and American Geriatrics Society. J Am Coll Cardiol 67(20):2419–2440. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.03.004 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yukina Hirata
    • 1
  • Kenya Kusunose
    • 1
    • 2
  • Hirotsugu Yamada
    • 1
    • 2
  • Rikuto Shimizu
    • 3
  • Yuta Torii
    • 1
  • Susumu Nishio
    • 1
  • Yoshihito Saijo
    • 2
  • Shoichiro Takao
    • 4
  • Takeshi Soeki
    • 2
  • Masataka Sata
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Ultrasound Examination CenterTokushima University HospitalTokushimaJapan
  2. 2.Department of Cardiovascular MedicineTokushima University HospitalTokushimaJapan
  3. 3.Radiological TechnologyTokushima University HospitalTokushimaJapan
  4. 4.Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Graduate School of Health SciencesTokushima UniversityTokushimaJapan

Personalised recommendations