Combined coronary lumen and vessel wall magnetic resonance imaging with i-T2prep: influence of nitroglycerin
- 440 Downloads
It has been shown that sublingual nitroglycerin (NTG) improves image quality of coronary lumen magnetic resonance angiography. Our aim was to investigate the influence of NTG on coronary lumen and vessel wall image quality using a combined, single sequence approach (i-T2prep), which is able to image both within the known time frame of action of NTG. Ten healthy volunteers underwent right coronary artery lumen and vessel wall imaging using the i-T2prep sequence before and after administration of NTG. Image quality was assessed qualitatively and quantitatively. Diameter, length and wall thickness were also measured using dedicated semi-automatic software. NTG induced coronary vasodilatation (lumen diameter increased from 2.16 ± 0.32 to 2.52 ± 0.59 mm; p = 0.036). As a result, visualized lumen length (9.8 ± 2.6 to 11.4 ± 3.3 cm; p = 0.025) and qualitative lumen image quality (median 3 (interquartile range 2–3.25) vs. median 3 (interquartile range 3–4); p = 0.046) both improved. Vessel wall imaging also demonstrated a significant improvement in vessel wall sharpness after NTG (24.8 vs. 27.3 %; p = 0.036). This study demonstrates the benefits of NTG for coronary lumen and vessel wall imaging using a combined sequence, i-T2prep. The methodology described here has great potential for future pathophysiological studies.
KeywordsNitroglycerin Coronary artery disease Magnetic resonance imaging
The authors acknowledge financial support from the Department of Health via the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) comprehensive Biomedical Research Centre award to Guy’s & St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust in partnership with King’s College London and King’s College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust. The MRI scanner is partly supported by Philips Healthcare.
Conflict of interest
None to declare.
- 2.Kim WY, Danias PG, Stuber M, Flamm SD, Plein S, Nagel E, Langerak SE, Weber OM, Pedersen EM, Schmidt M, Botnar RM, Manning WJ (2001) Coronary magnetic resonance angiography for the detection of coronary stenoses. N Engl J Med 345(26):1863–1869. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa010866.345/26/1863 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Boden WE, O’Rourke RA, Teo KK, Hartigan PM, Maron DJ, Kostuk W, Knudtson M, Dada M, Casperson P, Harris CL, Spertus JA, Shaw L, Chaitman BR, Mancini GB, Berman DS, Gau G, Weintraub WS (2007) The evolving pattern of symptomatic coronary artery disease in the United States and Canada: baseline characteristics of the Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive DruG Evaluation (COURAGE) trial. Am J Cardiol 99(2):208–212. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.07.082 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Kim WY, Stuber M, Bornert P, Kissinger KV, Manning WJ, Botnar RM (2002) Three-dimensional black-blood cardiac magnetic resonance coronary vessel wall imaging detects positive arterial remodeling in patients with nonsignificant coronary artery disease. Circulation 106(3):296–299PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Andia ME, Henningsson M, Hussain T, Phinikaridou A, Protti A, Greil G, Botnar RM (2013) Flow-independent 3D whole-heart vessel wall imaging using an interleaved T2-preparation acquisition. Magn Reson Med 69(1):150–157Google Scholar
- 16.Kim WY, Astrup AS, Stuber M, Tarnow L, Falk E, Botnar RM, Simonsen C, Pietraszek L, Hansen PR, Manning WJ, Andersen NT, Parving HH (2007) Subclinical coronary and aortic atherosclerosis detected by magnetic resonance imaging in type 1 diabetes with and without diabetic nephropathy. Circulation 115(2):228–235. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.633339 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Terashima M, Nguyen PK, Rubin GD, Iribarren C, Courtney BK, Go AS, Fortmann SP, McConnell MV (2008) Impaired coronary vasodilation by magnetic resonance angiography is associated with advanced coronary artery calcification. JACC Cardiovascular imaging 1(2):167–173. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2007.12.001 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar