Skip to main content
Log in

Evidence of myocardial scarring and microvascular obstruction on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in a series of patients presenting with myocardial infarction without obstructed coronary arteries

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Patients with acute chest pain, electrocardiographic ST-elevation and significant elevation of cardiac troponin but without obstructive coronary artery disease represent a diagnostic and therapeutic dilemma. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) can elucidate underlying alternative causes of troponin elevation including detection of (minor) myocardial infarction (MI) by identifying myocardial scarring as delayed enhancement. Of 77 patients, who were admitted between March 2009 and December 2012 with electrocardiographic (ECG) and biochemical evidence of acute MI without obstructive coronary artery disease, 45 patients underwent CMR that showed in 11/77 (14 %) late gadolinium enhancement (LGE), compatible with myocardial scarring. We analyzed clinical, echocardiographic, and CMR data of these patients. Elevated troponin I levels were observed in all patients (median 1.3 ng/l, IQR 0.44–187) with median peak creatinine phosphokinase of 485 U/l (IQR 234–618). Echocardiographic wall motion abnormalities were detected in 8/11 (73 %) patients; in 75 % of these segments, ECG abnormalities were observed in corresponding leads. CMR detected LGE in the inferior (4/11), the inferolateral (5/11), the inferoseptal (2/11), the anterior (3/11), apical (3/11) and in the lateral segments (2/11). In addition, in all but two patients, these segments matched ECG abnormalities in corresponding leads. CMR identified microvascular obstruction in 4/11 (36 %) patients. Patients with clinical, ECG, and biochemical signs of acute MI but unobstructed coronary arteries may have CMR-detectable myocardial scars. Information on myocardial scarring may help to make the diagnosis and draw therapeutic consequences. This case series underlines the value of contrast-enhanced CMR for myocardial tissue characterization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wang K, Asinger RW, Marriott HJL (2003) ST-segment elevation in conditions other than acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 348:2128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Assomull RG, Lyne JC, Keenan N, Gulati A, Bunce NH, Davies SW, Pennell DJ, Prasad SK (2007) The role of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients presenting with chest pain, raised troponin, and unobstructed coronary arteries. Eur Heart J 28(10):1242–1249

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Laraudogoitia Zaldumbide E, Pérez-David E, Larena JA, Velasco del Castillo S, Rumoroso Cuevas JR, Onaindía JJ, Lekuona Goya I, García-Fernández MA (2000) The value of cardiac magnetic resonance in patients with acute coronary syndrome and normal coronary arteries. Rev Esp Cardiol 62(9):976–983

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ambrosio G, Weisman HF, Mannisi JA, Becker LC (1989) Progressive impairment of regional myocardial perfusion after initial restoration of postischemic blood flow. Circulation 80:1846–1861

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wu KC, Zerhouni EA, Judd RM, Lugo-Olivier CH, Barouch LA, Schulman SP, Blumenthal RS, Lima JA (1998) Prognostic significance of microvascular obstruction by magnetic resonance imaging in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 97:765–772

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ito H, Maruyama A, Iwakura K, Takiuchi S, Masuyama T, Hori M, Higashino Y, Fujii K, Minamino T (1996) Clinical implications of the “no-reflow”phenomenon: a predictor of complications and left ventricular remodeling in reperfused anterior wall myocardial infarction. Circulation 93:223–228

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Blackburn H, Keys A, Simonsen E et al (1960) The electrocardiogram in population studies. A classification system. Circulation 21:1160–1175

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. ESC committee for practical guidelines (2007) Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndromes. The task force for the diagnosis and treatment of non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndromes of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 28:1598–1660

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cerqueira MD, Weissman NJ, Dilsizian V, Jacobs AK, Kaul S, Laskey WK et al (2002) Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart: a statement or healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council in Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association. Circulation 105:539–542

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bugiardini R, Manfrini O, De Ferrari GM (2006) Unanswered questions for management of acute coronary syndrome: risk stratification of patients with minimal disease or normal findings on coronary angiography. Arch Intern Med 166(13):1391–1395

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Jeremias A, Gibson CM (2005) Narrative review: alternative causes for elevated cardiac troponin levels when acute coronary syndromes are excluded. Ann Intern Med 142(9):786–791

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Aldrovandi A, Cademartiri F, Arduini D, Lina D, Ugo F, Maffei E, Menozzi A, Martini C, Palumbo A, Bontardelli F, Gherli T, Ruffini L, Ardissino D (2012) Computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with acute myocardial infarction without significant coronary stenosis. Circulation 126(25):3000–3007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kovacic JC, Fuster V (2012) Smoking gun theory; angiographically normal or mild coronary plaque as a cause of myocardial infarction. Circulation 126:2918–2920

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Yasue H, Nakagawa H, Itoh T, Harada E, Mizuno Y (2008) Coronary artery spasm—clinical features, diagnosis, pathogenesis and treatment. J Cardiol 51:2–17

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Böse D, von Birgelen C, Zhou XY, Schmermund A, Philipp S, Sack S et al (2008) Impact of atherosclerotic plaque composition on coronary microembolization during percutaneous coronary interventions. Basic Res Cardiol 103:587–597

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Christiansen JP, Edwards C, Sinclair T, Armstrong G, Scott A, Patel H, Hart H (2006) Detection of myocardial scar by contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients with troponin-positive chest pain and minimal angiographic coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 97(6):768–771

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeannine A. J. M. Hermens.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hermens, J.A.J.M., van Es, J., von Birgelen, C. et al. Evidence of myocardial scarring and microvascular obstruction on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in a series of patients presenting with myocardial infarction without obstructed coronary arteries. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 30, 1097–1103 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-014-0435-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-014-0435-7

Keywords

Navigation