Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Gender- and age-related differences in rest and post-stress left ventricular cardiac function determined by gated SPECT

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Gender- and age-related changes of left ventricular (LV) function and dimensions have not been elucidated in a large population by gated SPECT. Thus, the aim of this study was to derive male and female reference limits for left ventricular functional parameters, and determine the effect of age on LV dimensions and systolic function for this imaging modality. 1,639 (53 % males) subjects without cardiovascular disease who underwent cardiac SPECT between January 2002 and June 2012 were included in this study. Mean age at presentation was 61 ± 12 years (range 18–92 years). A significant effect of age (p = 0.011) and gender (p < 0.0001) on resting LV ejection fraction (LVEF) was observed, with an increase in LVEF with age being more pronounced in women (ΔB-coefficient: −0.088, p = 0.011). Overall, mean LVEF was higher in women compared to men (70.3 ± 8.6 % vs. 64.4 ± 7.5 %, p < 0.0001). LVEF after pharmacological stress with adenosine was significantly lower than at rest in both women and men (∆LVEF = 1.1 % in males and ∆LVEF = 1.6 % in females, p = 0.01), which was the result of a significant increase in end-systolic volume after stress (p = 0.0001). With advancing age an increase in LVEF was observed that was more pronounced in women than in men. These findings indicate that the evaluation of cardiac function and volumes of patients by gated SPECT should consider age- and gender-matched normative values.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nakajima K, Kusuoka H, Nishimura S, Yamashina A, Nishimura T (2007) Normal limits of ejection fraction and volumes determined by gated SPECT in clinically normal patients without cardiac events: a study based on the J-ACCESS database. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 34(7):1088–1096

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Wang SY, Cheng MF, Hwang JJ, Hung CS, Wu YW (2011) Sex-specific normal limits of left ventricular ejection fraction and volumes estimated by gated myocardial perfusion imaging in adult patients in Taiwan: a comparison between two quantitative methods. Nucl Med Commun 32(2):113–120

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Port S, Cobb FR, Coleman RE, Jones RH (1980) Effect of age on the response of the left ventricular ejection fraction to exercise. N Engl J Med 303(20):1133–1137

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Montalescot G, Sechtem U, Achenbach S, Andreotti F, Arden C, Budaj A et al (2013) ESC guidelines on the management of stable coronary artery disease: the Task Force on the management of stable coronary artery disease of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 34(38):2949–3003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hesse B, Tagil K, Cuocolo A, Anagnostopoulos C, Bardies M, Bax J et al (2005) EANM/ESC procedural guidelines for myocardial perfusion imaging in nuclear cardiology. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 32(7):855–897

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. De Bondt P, Van de Wiele C, De Sutter J, De Winter F, De Backer G, Dierckx RA (2001) Age- and gender-specific differences in left ventricular cardiac function and volumes determined by gated SPET. Eur J Nucl Med 28(5):620–624

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Rozanski A, Nichols K, Yao SS, Malholtra S, Cohen R, DePuey EG (2000) Development and application of normal limits for left ventricular ejection fraction and volume measurements from 99mTc-sestamibi myocardial perfusion gates SPECT. J Nucl Med 41(9):1445–1450

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Peace RA, Adams PC, Lloyd JJ (2008) Effect of sex, age, and weight on ejection fraction and end-systolic volume reference limits in gated myocardial perfusion SPECT. J Nucl Cardiol 15(1):86–93

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ababneh AA, Sciacca RR, Kim B, Bergmann SR (2000) Normal limits for left ventricular ejection fraction and volumes estimated with gated myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with normal exercise test results: influence of tracer, gender, and acquisition camera. J Nucl Cardiol 7(6):661–668

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Akhter N, Nakajima K, Okuda K, Matsuo S, Yoneyama T, Taki J et al (2008) Regional wall thickening in gated myocardial perfusion SPECT in a Japanese population: effect of sex, radiotracer, rotation angles and frame rates. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 35(9):1608–1615

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Badano L, Carratino L, Giunta L, Calisi P, Lucatti A (1992) Age-induced changes in the cardiovascular system in normal subjects. G Ital Cardiol 22(9):1023–1034

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kaku K, Takeuchi M, Otani K, Sugeng L, Nakai H, Haruki N et al (2011) Age- and gender-dependency of left ventricular geometry assessed with real-time three-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr (Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov’t) 24(5):541–547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Feng B, Sitek A, Gullberg GT (2002) Calculation of the left ventricular ejection fraction without edge detection: application to small hearts. J Nucl Med 43(6):786–794

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Nakajima K, Taki J, Higuchi T, Kawano M, Taniguchi M, Maruhashi K et al (2000) Gated SPET quantification of small hearts: mathematical simulation and clinical application. Eur J Nucl Med 27(9):1372–1379

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Nakajima K, Okuda K, Nystrom K, Richter J, Minarik D, Wakabayashi H et al (2013) Improved quantification of small hearts for gated myocardial perfusion imaging. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 40(8):1163–1170

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sharir T, Bacher-Stier C, Dhar S, Lewin HC, Miranda R, Friedman JD et al (2000) Identification of severe and extensive coronary artery disease by postexercise regional wall motion abnormalities in Tc-99m sestamibi gated single-photon emission computed tomography. Am J Cardiol 86(11):1171–1175

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Carvalho PA, Aguiar PM, Grossman GB, Moraes JF, Baptista IS, Hirakata VN et al (2012) Prognostic implications of the difference between left ventricular ejection fractions after stress and at rest in addition to the quantification of myocardial perfusion abnormalities obtained with gated SPECT. Clin Nucl Med 37(8):748–754

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Yoshioka J, Node K, Hasegawa S, Paul AK, Mu X, Maruyama K et al (2003) Impaired cardiac response to exercise in post-menopausal women: relationship with peripheral vascular function. Nucl Med Commun 24(4):383–389

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bush DE, Jones CE, Bass KM, Walters GK, Bruza JM, Ouyang P (1998) Estrogen replacement reverses endothelial dysfunction in postmenopausal women. Am J Med 104(6):552–558

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Yamada K, Isobe S, Hirai M, Unno K, Ohshima S, Takada Y et al (2006) Changes with age in left ventricular function and volumes at rest and postexercise in postmenopausal women. Ann Nucl Med 20(10):677–681

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ferro A, Petretta M, Acampa W, Fiumara G, Daniele S, Petretta MP et al (2013) Post-stress left ventricular ejection fraction drop in patients with diabetes: a gated myocardial perfusion imaging study. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 13:99

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Acampa W, Caprio MG, Nicolai E, Liuzzi R, De Luca S, Capasso E et al (2010) Assessment of poststress left ventricular ejection fraction by gated SPECT: comparison with equilibrium radionuclide angiocardiography. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 37(2):349–356

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The study was supported by Grants from the Swiss National Science Foundation (PAK, MF) and from the Olten Heart Foundation, Switzerland (CG, BES).

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cardiac Imaging, University Hospital Zurich, Ramistrasse 100, NUK C 42, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland

    Catherine Gebhard, Barbara E. Stähli, Caroline E. Gebhard, Michael Fiechter, Tobias A. Fuchs, Julia Stehli, Bernd Klaeser, Felix C. Tanner, Oliver Gaemperli & Philipp A. Kaufmann

  2. Zurich Center for Integrative Human Physiology (ZIHP), University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

    Michael Fiechter, Felix C. Tanner & Philipp A. Kaufmann

Authors
  1. Catherine Gebhard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Barbara E. Stähli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Caroline E. Gebhard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Michael Fiechter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Tobias A. Fuchs
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Julia Stehli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Bernd Klaeser
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Felix C. Tanner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Oliver Gaemperli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Philipp A. Kaufmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Philipp A. Kaufmann.

Additional information

Catherine Gebhard and Barbara E. Stähli have contributed equally to this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gebhard, C., Stähli, B.E., Gebhard, C.E. et al. Gender- and age-related differences in rest and post-stress left ventricular cardiac function determined by gated SPECT. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 30, 1191–1199 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-014-0431-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-014-0431-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation