Abstract
Long term follow-up of coronary CT angiography (CCTA) is scarce. The aim of the present study was to assess the prognostic value of CCTA over a follow-up period of more than 6 years. 218 Patients were included undergoing 64-slice CCTA. Images were analysed with regard to the presence of nonobstructive (<50 %) or obstructive (50 % stenosis) coronary artery disease (CAD). Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) were defined as death, nonfatal myocardial infarction or urgent coronary revascularization. CCTA revealed normal coronaries in 49, nonobstructive lesions in 94, and obstructive CAD in 75 patients. During a median follow-up period of 6.9 years, MACE occurred in 45 patients (21 %). Annual MACE rates were 0.3, 2.7, and 6.0 % (p = 0.001), for patients with normal CCTA, nonobstructive, and obstructive CAD, respectively. Multivariate Cox regression analysis identified the number of segments with plaques [hazard ratio (HR) 1.18, p = 0.002] as well as the presence of obstructive lesions (HR 2.28, p = 0.036) as independent predictors of MACE. The present study extends the predictive value of CCTA over more than 6 years. Patients with normal coronary arteries of CCTA continue to have an excellent cardiac prognosis, while outcome is progressively worse in patients with nonobstructive and obstructive CAD.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abdulla J, Asferg C, Kofoed KF (2011) Prognostic value of absence or presence of coronary artery disease determined by 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 27:413–420
Gaemperli O, Valenta I, Schepis T, Husmann L, Scheffel H, Desbiolles L et al (2008) Coronary 64-slice CT angiography predicts outcome in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. Eur Radiol 18:1162–1173
Min JK, Shaw LJ, Devereux RB, Okin PM, Weinsaft JW, Russo DJ et al (2007) Prognostic value of multidetector coronary computed tomographic angiography for prediction of all-cause mortality. J Am Coll Cardiol 50:1161–1170
van Werkhoven JM, Gaemperli O, Schuijf JD, Jukema JW, Kroft LJ, Leschka S et al (2009) Multislice computed tomography coronary angiography for risk stratification in patients with an intermediate pretest likelihood. Heart 95:1607–1611
Motoyama S, Sarai M, Harigaya H, Anno H, Inoue K, Hara T et al (2009) Computed tomographic angiography characteristics of atherosclerotic plaques subsequently resulting in acute coronary syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol 54:49–57
Min JK, Dunning A, Lin FY, Achenbach S, Al-Mallah M, Budoff MJ et al (2011) Age- and sex-related differences in all-cause mortality risk based on coronary computed tomography angiography findings results from the International Multicenter CONFIRM (Coronary CT Angiography Evaluation for Clinical Outcomes: an International Multicenter Registry) of 23,854 patients without known coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 58:849–860
Andreini D, Pontone G, Mushtaq S, Bartorelli AL, Bertella E, Antonioli L et al (2012) A long-term prognostic value of coronary CT angiography in suspected coronary artery disease. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 5:690–701
Sozzi FB, Civaia F, Rossi P, Robillon JF, Rusek S, Berthier F et al (2011) Long-term follow-up of patients with first-time chest pain having 64-slice computed tomography. Am J Cardiol 107:516–521
Austen WG, Edwards JE, Frye RL, Gensini GG, Gott VL, Griffith LS et al (1975) A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association. Circulation 51:5–40
Leber AW, Knez A, von Ziegler F, Becker A, Nikolaou K, Paul S et al (2005) Quantification of obstructive and nonobstructive coronary lesions by 64-slice computed tomography: a comparative study with quantitative coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol 46:147–154
Agatston AS, Janowitz WR, Hildner FJ, Zusmer NR, Viamonte M Jr, Detrano R (1990) Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 15:827–832
Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, Simoons ML, Chaitman BR, White HD (2012) Third universal definition of myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J 33:2551–2567
Fluss R, Faraggi D, Reiser B (2005) Estimation of the Youden index and its associated cutoff point. Biom J 47:458–472
Ostrom MP, Gopal A, Ahmadi N, Nasir K, Yang E, Kakadiaris I et al (2008) Mortality incidence and the severity of coronary atherosclerosis assessed by computed tomography angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 52:1335–1343
Hadamitzky M, Taubert S, Deseive S, Byrne RA, Martinoff S, Schomig A et al (2013) Prognostic value of coronary computed tomography angiography during 5 years of follow-up in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J 34:3277–3285
Chang SM, Nabi F, Xu J, Peterson LE, Achari A, Pratt CM et al (2009) The coronary artery calcium score and stress myocardial perfusion imaging provide independent and complementary prediction of cardiac risk. J Am Coll Cardiol 54:1872–1882
Abbara S, Arbab-Zadeh A, Callister TQ, Desai MY, Mamuya W, Thomson L et al (2009) SCCT guidelines for performance of coronary computed tomographic angiography: a report of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography Guidelines Committee. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 3:190–204
Acknowledgments
The study was supported by Grants from the Swiss National Science Foundation to PAK. Furthermore, we thank Ennio Mueller and Gentian Cermjani for their excellent technical support.
Conflict of interest
None declared.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Svetlana Dougoud and Tobias A. Fuchs have contributed equally to this work and share first coauthorship.
Philipp A. Kaufmann and Oliver Gaemperli have contributed equally to this work and share last coauthorship.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dougoud, S., Fuchs, T.A., Stehli, J. et al. Prognostic value of coronary CT angiography on long-term follow-up of 6.9 years. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 30, 969–976 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-014-0420-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-014-0420-1