Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Retraction to: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging (2013) 29:443–452 DOI 10.1007/s10554-012-0095-4
Diagnostic Accuracy of 320-row Computed Tomography as Compared with Invasive Coronary Arteriography in Unselected, Consecutive Patients with Suspected Coronary Artery Disease by F. Pelliccia, V. Pasceri, A. Evangelista, A. Pergolini, F. Barilla, N. Viceconte, G. Tanzilli, M. Schiariti, C. Greco, C. Gaudio published online in the International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging on July 18, 2012, DOI 10.1007/s10554-012-0095-4 has been retracted at the request of the Editor-in-Chief as it contains large portions of text that have been duplicated from Noninvasive Coronary Angiography by 320-Row Computed Tomography with Lower Radiation Exposure and Maintained Diagnostic Accuracy. Comparison of Results with Cardiac Catheterization in a Head-to-Head Pilot Investigation by M. Dewey, E. Zimmermann, F. Deissenrieder, M. Laule, H.-P. Dübel, P. Schlattmann, F. Knebel, W. Rutsch and B. Hamm published online in Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging on August 24, 2009, DOI 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.859280.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The online version of the original article can be found under doi:10.1007/s10554-012-0095-4.
About this article
Cite this article
Pelliccia, F., Pasceri, V., Evangelista, A. et al. Retraction Note: Diagnostic accuracy of 320-row computed tomography as compared with invasive coronary angiography in unselected, consecutive patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 30, 833 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-014-0400-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-014-0400-5