Skip to main content
Log in

Assessment of right ventricular function with 320-slice volume cardiac CT: comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To evaluate the accuracy and feasibility of right ventricular function parameters measurement using 320-slice volume cardiac CT. Retrospective analysis of 50 consecutive patients (23 men, 27 women) with suspected pulmonary diseases was performed in electrocardiogram (ECG)-gated cardiac CT and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR). Parameters including right ventricular end-diastolic volume (RVEDV), right ventricular end- systolic volume (RVESV), right ventricular stroke volume (RVSV), right ventricular cardiac output (RVCO), and right ventricular ejection fraction (RVEF) were semi-automatically and separately calculated from both CT and CMR data. Significant difference between measurements was measured by paired t test and two-variable linear regression analysis with Pearson’s correlation coefficient. Bland–Altman analysis was performed in each pair of parameters. There was little variability between the measurements by the two observers (kappa = 0.895–0.980, P < 0.05). There was good correlation between all parameters obtained by CT and CMR (P < 0.001): RVEDV (108.5 ± 21.9 ml, 113.5 ± 24.8 ml, r = 0.944), RVESV (69.8 ± 33.4 ml, 73.2 ± 35.4 ml, r = 0.972), RVSV (39.0 ± 13.2 ml, 40.2 ± 13.3 ml, r = 0.977), RVCO (2.6 ± 0.7 l, 2.6 ± 0.7 l. r = 0.958), RVEF (38.8 ± 19.1 %, 39.1 ± 19.3 %, r = 0.990), and there was no significant difference between CT and CMR measurements in RVEF (n = 50, t = −0.677, P > 0.05). 320-slice volume cardiac CT is an accurate non-invasive technique to evaluate RV function.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Menzel T, Kramm T, Bruckner A, Mohr-Kahaly S, Mayer E, Meyer J (2002) Quantitative assessment of right ventricular volumes in severe chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension using transthoracic three-dimensional echocardiography: changes due to pulmonary thromboendarterectomy. Eur J Echocardiogr 3(1):67–72

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Liang L, Xu W, Li K, Du X, Gao Y (2009) Assessment of right ventricular function with 64-detector CT. Chin J Med Imaging Technology 25(6):1025–1028

    Google Scholar 

  3. Oldershaw P (1992) Assessment of right ventricular function and its role in clinical practice. Br Heart J 68(1):12–15

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Goldstein J (2005) The right entricle: what’s right and what’s wrong. Coron Artery Dis 16:1–3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Barkhausen J, Ruehm SG, Goyen M, Buck T, Laub G, Debatin JF (2001) MR evaluation of ventricular function: true fast imaging with steady-state precession versus fast low-angle shot cine MR imaging: feasibility study. Radiology 219(1):264–269

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Mogelvang J, Stubgaard M, Thomsen C, Henriksen O (1988) Evaluation of right ventricular volumes measured by magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Heart J 9(5):529–533

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Grothues F, Moon JC, Bellenger NG, Smith GS, Klein HU, Pennell DJ (2004) Interstudy reproducibility of right ventricular volumes, function, and mass with cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Am Heart J 147(2):218–223. doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2003.10.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Helbing WA, Bosch HG, Maliepaard C, Rebergen SA, van der Geest RJ, Hansen B, Ottenkamp J, Reiber JH, de Roos A (1995) Comparison of echocardiographic methods with magnetic resonance imaging for assessment of right ventricular function in children. Am J Cardiol 76(8):589–594

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Danilouchkine MG, Westenberg JJ, de Roos A, Reiber JH, Lelieveldt BP (2005) Operator induced variability in cardiovascular MR: left ventricular measurements and their reproducibility. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 7(2):447–457

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ghaye B, Ghuysen A, Bruyere PJ, D’Orio V, Dondelinger RF (2006) Can CT pulmonary angiography allow assessment of severity and prognosis in patients presenting with pulmonary embolism? What the radiologist needs to know. Radiographics 26(1):23–39. doi:10.1148/rg.261055062 discussion 39–40

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hoey ET, Gopalan D, Agrawal SK, Screaton NJ (2009) Cardiac causes of pulmonary arterial hypertension: assessment with multidetector CT. Eur Radiol 19(11):2557–2568. doi:10.1007/s00330-009-1460-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Spencer KT, Garcia MJ, Weinart L, Vignon P, Lang R (1999) Assessment of right ventricular and right atrial systolic and diastolic performance using automated border detection. Echocardiography 16(7, Pt 1):643–652

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Thorne MC (1992) 1990 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Ann ICRP 21(1–3):51–52. doi:0306-4549(92)90053-E

  14. Manzke R, Grass M, Nielsen T, Shechter G, Hawkes D (2003) Adaptive temporal resolution optimization in helical cardiac cone beam CT reconstruction. Med Phys 30(12):3072–3080

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Wintersperger BJ, Nikolaou K (2005) Basics of cardiac MDCT: techniques and contrast application. Eur Radiol 15(Suppl 2):B2–B9

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Biao Lu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Huang, X., Pu, X., Dou, R. et al. Assessment of right ventricular function with 320-slice volume cardiac CT: comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 28 (Suppl 2), 87–92 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-012-0156-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-012-0156-8

Keywords

Navigation