Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Evaluation of the aortic and mitral valves with cardiac computed tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging

  • Published:
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cardiac computed tomography (CT) produces high-quality anatomical images of the cardiac valves and associated structures. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides images of valve morphology, and allows quantitative evaluation of valvular dysfunction and determination of the impact of valvular lesions on cardiovascular structures. Recent studies have demonstrated that cardiac CT and MRI are important adjuncts to echocardiography for the evaluation of aortic and mitral valvular heart diseases (VHDs). Radiologists should be aware of the technical aspects of cardiac CT and MRI that allow comprehensive assessment of aortic and mitral VHDs, as well as the typical imaging features of common and important aortic and mitral VHDs on cardiac CT and MRI.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

AF:

Atrial fibrillation

AR:

Aortic regurgitation

AS:

Aortic stenosis

AVA:

Aortic valve area

BAV:

Bicuspid aortic valve

CAD:

Coronary artery disease

CT:

Computed tomography

D:

Dimensional

ECG:

Electrocardiography

IE:

Infective endocarditis

LV:

Left ventricular

MDCT:

Multidetector computed tomography

MR:

Mitral regurgitation

MRI:

Magnetic resonance imaging

MS:

Mitral stenosis

MVA:

Mitral valve area

RF:

Regurgitant fraction

ROA:

Regurgitant orifice area

SSFP:

Steady-state free precession

TAV:

Tricuspid aortic valve

TTE:

Transthoracic echocardiography

VHD:

Valvular heart disease

References

  1. Rosamond W, Flegal K, Furie K et al (2008) Heart disease and stroke statistics–2008 update: a report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Circulation 117(4):e25–e146

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lung B, Baron G, Butchart EF et al (2003) A prospective survey of patients with valvular heart disease in Europe: the Euro heart survey on valvular heart disease. Eur Heart J 24(13):1231–1243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cicioni C, Di Luzio V, Di Emidio L et al (2006) Limitations and discrepancies of transthoracic and transoesophageal echocardiography compared with surgical findings in patients submitted to surgery for complications of infective endocarditis. J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown) 7(9):660–666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ketelsen D, Fishman EK, Claussen CD, Vogel-Claussen J (2010) Computed tomography evaluation of cardiac valves: a review. Radiol Clin N Am 48(4):783–797

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cawley PJ, Maki JH, Otto CM (2009) Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging for valvular heart disease: technique and validation. Circulation 119(3):468–478

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Christiansen JP, Karamitsos TD, Myerson SG (2011) Assessment of valvular heart disease by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging: a review. Heart Lung Circ 20(2):73–82

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bettencourt N, Rocha J, Carvalho M et al (2009) Multislice computed tomography in the exclusion of coronary artery disease in patients with presurgical valve disease. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2(4):306–313

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Feuchtner GM, Muller S, Bonatti J et al (2007) Sixty-four slice CT evaluation of aortic stenosis using planimetry of the aortic valve area. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189(1):197–203

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Jassal DS, Shapiro MD, Neilan TG et al (2007) 64-slice multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) for detection of aortic regurgitation and quantification of severity. Invest Radiol 42(7):507–512

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Li X, Tang L, Zhou L et al (2009) Aortic valves stenosis and regurgitation: assessment with dual source computed tomography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 25(6):591–600

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Vogel-Claussen J, Pannu H, Spevak PJ et al (2006) Cardiac valve assessment with MR imaging and 64-section multi-detector row CT. Radiographics 26(6):1769–1784

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. LaBounty TM, Sundaram B, Agarwal P et al (2008) Aortic valve area on 64-MDCT correlates with transesophageal echocardiography in aortic stenosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 191(6):1652–1658

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Feuchtner GM, Dichtl W, Muller S et al (2008) 64-MDCT for diagnosis of aortic regurgitation in patients referred to CT coronary angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 191(1):W1–W7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lembcke A, Durmus T, Westermann Y et al (2011) Assessment of mitral valve stenosis by helical MDCT: comparison with transthoracic Doppler echocardiography and cardiac catheterization. AJR Am J Roentgenol 197(3):614–622

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Alkadhi H, Wildermuth S, Bettex DA et al (2006) Mitral regurgitation: quantification with 16-detector row CT-initial experience. Radiology 238(2):454–463

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Didier D, Ratib O, Lerch R, Friedli B (2000) Detection and quantification of valvular heart disease with dynamic cardiac MR imaging. Radiographics 20(5):1279–1299 Discussion 1299–1301

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Lotz J, Meier C, Leppert A, Galanski M (2002) Cardiovascular flow measurement with phase-contrast MR imaging: basic facts and implementation. Radiographics 22(3):651–671

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Taylor AJ, Cerqueira M, Hodgson JM et al (2010) ACCF/SCCT/ACR/AHA/ASE/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SCMR 2010 appropriate use criteria for cardiac computed tomography. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, the American College of Radiology, the American Heart Association, the American Society of Echocardiography, the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, the North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging, the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. J Am Coll Cardiol 56(22):1864–1894

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hausleiter J, Meyer T, Hermann F et al (2009) Estimated radiation dose associated with cardiac CT angiography. JAMA 301(5):500–507

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Mehra VC, Valdiviezo C, Arbab-Zadeh A et al (2011) A stepwise approach to the visual interpretation of CT-based myocardial perfusion. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 5(6):357–369

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hendel RC, Patel MR, Kramer CM et al (2006) ACCF/ACR/SCCT/SCMR/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SIR 2006 appropriateness criteria for cardiac computed tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Quality Strategic Directions Committee Appropriateness Criteria Working Group, American College of Radiology, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, North American Society for Cardiac Imaging, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Interventional Radiology. J Am Coll Cardiol 48(7):1475–1497

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Myerson SG (2009) Valvular and hemodynamic assessment with CMR. Heart Fail Clin 5(3):389–400

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Masci PG, Dymarkowski S, Bogaert J (2008) Valvular heart disease: what does cardiovascular MRI add? Eur Radiol 18(2):197–208

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Pollak Y, Comeau CR, Wolff SD (2002) Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis of the aortic valve diagnosed on MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 179(6):1647

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Alkadhi H, Leschka S, Trindade PT et al (2010) Cardiac CT for the differentiation of bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valves: comparison with echocardiography and surgery. AJR Am J Roentgenol 195(4):900–908

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Chun EJ, Choi SI, Lim C et al (2008) Aortic stenosis: evaluation with multidetector CT angiography and MR imaging. Korean J Radiol 9(5):439–448

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Gleeson TG, Mwangi I, Horgan SJ et al (2008) Steady-state free-precession (SSFP) cine MRI in distinguishing normal and bicuspid aortic valves. J Magn Reson Imaging 28(4):873–878

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Chatterjee K et al (2008) 2008 Focused update incorporated into the ACC/AHA 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 1998 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease): endorsed by the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Circulation 118(15):e523–e661

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Bouvier E, Logeart D, Sablayrolles JL et al (2006) Diagnosis of aortic valvular stenosis by multislice cardiac computed tomography. Eur Heart J 27(24):3033–3038

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Kupfahl C, Honold M, Meinhardt G et al (2004) Evaluation of aortic stenosis by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging: comparison with established routine clinical techniques. Heart 90(8):893–901

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Djavidani B, Debl K, Lenhart M et al (2005) Planimetry of mitral valve stenosis by magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 45(12):2048–2053

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Lin SJ, Brown PA, Watkins MP et al (2004) Quantification of stenotic mitral valve area with magnetic resonance imaging and comparison with Doppler ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol 44(1):133–137

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. O’Brien KR, Myerson SG, Cowan BR et al (2009) Phase contrast ultrashort TE: a more reliable technique for measurement of high-velocity turbulent stenotic jets. Magn Reson Med 62(3):626–636

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Heidenreich PA, Steffens J, Fujita N et al (1995) Evaluation of mitral stenosis with velocity-encoded cine-magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Cardiol 75(5):365–369

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Jeon MH, Choe YH, Cho SJ et al (2010) Planimetric measurement of the regurgitant orifice area using multidetector CT for aortic regurgitation: a comparison with the use of echocardiography. Korean J Radiol 11(2):169–177

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Alkadhi H, Desbiolles L, Husmann L et al (2007) Aortic regurgitation: assessment with 64-section CT. Radiology 245(1):111–121

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Pouleur AC, le Polain de Waroux JB, Pasquet A et al (2007) Planimetric and continuity equation assessment of aortic valve area: head to head comparison between cardiac magnetic resonance and echocardiography. J Magn Reson Imaging 26(6):1436–1443

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Goffinet C, Kersten V, Pouleur AC et al (2010) Comprehensive assessment of the severity and mechanism of aortic regurgitation using multidetector CT and MR. Eur Radiol 20(2):326–336

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Apostolakis EE, Baikoussis NG (2009) Methods of estimation of mitral valve regurgitation for the cardiac surgeon. J Cardiothorac Surg 4:34

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Guo YK, Yang ZG, Ning G et al (2009) Isolated mitral regurgitation: quantitative assessment with 64-section multidetector CT-comparison with MR imaging and echocardiography. Radiology 252(2):369–376

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Ley S, Eichhorn J, Ley-Zaporozhan J et al (2007) Evaluation of aortic regurgitation in congenital heart disease: value of MR imaging in comparison to echocardiography. Pediatr Radiol 37(5):426–436

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Kutty S, Whitehead KK, Natarajan S et al (2009) Qualitative echocardiographic assessment of aortic valve regurgitation with quantitative cardiac magnetic resonance: a comparative study. Pediatr Cardiol 30(7):971–977

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Sechtem U, Pflugfelder PW, Cassidy MM et al (1988) Mitral or aortic regurgitation: quantification of regurgitant volumes with cine MR imaging. Radiology 167(2):425–430

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Nigri M, Azevedo CF, Rochitte CE et al (2009) Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging identifies focal regions of intramyocardial fibrosis in patients with severe aortic valve disease: correlation with quantitative histopathology. Am Heart J 157(2):361–368

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Bak SH, Ko SM, Jeon HJ et al (2012) Assessment of global left ventricular function with dual-source computed tomography in patients with valvular heart disease. Acta Radiol 53(3):270–277

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Kapa S, Martinez MW, Williamson EE et al (2010) ECG-gated dual-source CT for detection of left atrial appendage thrombus in patients undergoing catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 29(2):75–81

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Tadros TM, Klein MD, Shapira OM (2009) Ascending aortic dilatation associated with bicuspid aortic valve: pathophysiology, molecular biology, and clinical implications. Circulation 119(6):880–890

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Bandettini WP, Arai AE (2008) Advances in clinical applications of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging. Heart 94(11):1485–1495

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Williams MC, Reid JH, McKillop G et al (2011) Cardiac and coronary CT comprehensive imaging approach in the assessment of coronary heart disease. Heart 97(15):1198–1205

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Chheda SV, Srichai MB, Donnino R et al (2010) Evaluation of the mitral and aortic valves with cardiac CT angiography. J Thorac Imaging 25(1):76–85

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Ryan R, Abbara S, Colen RR et al (2008) Cardiac valve disease: spectrum of findings on cardiac 64-MDCT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 190(5):W294–W303

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Siu SC, Silversides CK (2010) Bicuspid aortic valve disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 55(25):2789–2800

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Joo I, Park EA, Kim KH et al (2012) MDCT differentiation between bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valves in patients with aortic valvular disease: correlation with surgical findings. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 28(1):171–182

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Ferda J, Linhartova K, Kreuzberg B (2008) Comparison of the aortic valve calcium content in the bicuspid and tricuspid stenotic aortic valve using non-enhanced 64-detector-row-computed tomography with prospective ECG-triggering. Eur J Radiol 68(3):471–475

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Weidemann F, Herrmann S, Stork S et al (2009) Impact of myocardial fibrosis in patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis. Circulation 120(7):577–584

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Timperley J, Milner R, Marshall AJ, Gilbert TJ (2002) Quadricuspid aortic valves. Clin Cardiol 25(12):548–552

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Morris MF, Maleszewski JJ, Suri RM et al (2010) CT and MR imaging of the mitral valve: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics 30(6):1603–1620

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Feuchtner G, Mueller S, Bonatti J et al (2004) Images in cardiovascular medicine. Prolapsing atrial myxoma: dynamic visualization with multislice computed tomography. Circulation 109(12):e165–e166

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Wolf PA, Dawber TR, Thomas HE Jr, Kannel WB (1978) Epidemiologic assessment of chronic atrial fibrillation and risk of stroke: the Framingham study. Neurology 28(10):973–977

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Hur J, Kim YJ, Nam JE et al (2008) Thrombus in the left atrial appendage in stroke patients: detection with cardiac CT angiography–a preliminary report. Radiology 249(1):81–87

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Hayek E, Gring CN, Griffin BP (2005) Mitral valve prolapse. Lancet 365(9458):507–518

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Enriquez-Sarano M, Freeman WK, Tribouilloy CM et al (1999) Functional anatomy of mitral regurgitation: accuracy and outcome implications of transesophageal echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 34(4):1129–1136

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Shah RG, Novaro GM, Blandon RJ et al (2010) Mitral valve prolapse: evaluation with ECG-gated cardiac CT angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 194(3):579–584

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Feuchtner GM, Alkadhi H, Karlo C et al (2010) Cardiac CT angiography for the diagnosis of mitral valve prolapse: comparison with echocardiography1. Radiology 254(2):374–383

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Han Y, Peters DC, Salton CJ et al (2008) Cardiovascular magnetic resonance characterization of mitral valve prolapse. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 1(3):294–303

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. D’Ancona G, Mamone G, Marrone G et al (2007) Ischemic mitral valve regurgitation: the new challenge for magnetic resonance imaging. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 32(3):475–480

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Stuesse DC, Vlessis AA (1999) Epidemiology of native valve endocarditis. In: Vlesis AA, Bolling S (eds) Endocarditis: a multidisciplinary approach to modern treatment. Futura Publishing Co, Armonk, pp 77–84

    Google Scholar 

  68. Otto CM (2004) Infective endocarditis. In: Otto CM (ed) Valvular heart disease. WB Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 482–521

    Google Scholar 

  69. Feuchtner GM, Stolzmann P, Dichtl W et al (2009) Multislice computed tomography in infective endocarditis: comparison with transesophageal echocardiography and intraoperative findings. J Am Coll Cardiol 53(5):436–444

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Aslam AK, Aslam AF, Vasavada BC, Khan IA (2007) Prosthetic heart valves: types and echocardiographic evaluation. Int J Cardiol 122(2):99–110

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Kim RJ, Weinsaft JW, Callister TQ, Min JK (2007) Evaluation of prosthetic valve endocarditis by 64-row multidetector computed tomography. Int J Cardiol 120(2):e27–e29

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Habets J, Symersky P, van Herwerden LA et al (2011) Prosthetic heart valve assessment with multidetector-row CT: imaging characteristics of 91 valves in 83 patients. Eur Radiol 21(7):1390–1396

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Lee DH, Youn HJ, Shim SB et al (2009) The measurment of opening angle and orifice area of a bileaflet mechanical valve using multidetector computed tomography. Korean Circ J 39(4):157–162

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Tsai IC, Lin YK, Chang Y et al (2009) Correctness of multi-detector-row computed tomography for diagnosing mechanical prosthetic heart valve disorders using operative findings as a gold standard. Eur Radiol 19(4):857–867

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by KonKuk University in 2012.

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiology, Konkuk University Hospital, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

    Sung Min Ko

  2. Department of Thoracic Surgery, Konkuk University Hospital, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

    Meong Gun Song

  3. Department of Cardiology, Konkuk University Hospital, Konkuk University School of Medicine, 4-12 Hwayang-dong, Gwangjin-gu, 143-729, Seoul, Korea

    Hweung Kon Hwang

Authors
  1. Sung Min Ko
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Meong Gun Song
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hweung Kon Hwang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hweung Kon Hwang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ko, S.M., Song, M.G. & Hwang, H.K. Evaluation of the aortic and mitral valves with cardiac computed tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 28 (Suppl 2), 109–127 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-012-0144-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-012-0144-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation