Skip to main content
Log in

Impact of right ventricular endocardial trabeculae on volumes and function assessed by CMR in patients with tetralogy of Fallot

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The objective of this study was to assess the impact of right ventricular (RV) trabeculae and papillary muscles on measured volumes and function assessed by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in patients with repaired tetralogy of Fallot. Sixty-five patients with repaired tetralogy of Fallot underwent routine cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging. Endocardial and epicardial contours were drawn manually and included trabeculae and papillary muscles in the blood volume. Semi-automatic threshold-based segmentation software excluded these structures. Both methods were compared in terms of end-diastolic, end-systolic and stroke volume, ejection fraction and mass. Observer agreement was determined for all measures. Exclusion of trabeculae and papillary muscle in the RV blood volume decreased measured RV end-diastolic volume by 15 % (from 140 ± 35 to 120 ± 32 ml/m2) compared to inclusion, end-systolic volume by 21 % (from 74 ± 23 to 59 ± 20 ml/m2), stroke volume by 9 % (from 66 ± 16 to 60 ± 16 ml/m2) and relatively increased ejection fraction by 7 % (from 48 ± 7 to 51 ± 8 %) and end-diastolic mass by 79 % (from 28 ± 7 to 51 ± 10 g/m2), p < .01. Excluding trabeculae and papillary muscle resulted in an improved interobserver agreement of RV mass compared to including these structures (coefficient of agreement of 87 versus 78 %, p < .01). Trabeculae and papillary muscle significantly affect measured RV volumes, function and mass. Semi-automatic threshold-based segmentation software can reliably exclude trabeculae and papillary muscles from the RV blood volume.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Therrien J, Provost Y, Merchant N, Williams W, Colman J, Webb G (2005) Optimal timing for pulmonary valve replacement in adults after tetralogy of Fallot repair. Am J Cardiol 95:779–782

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Buechel ER, Dave HH, Kellenberger CJ, Dodge-Khatami A, Pretre R, Berger F, Bauersfeld U (2005) Remodelling of the right ventricle after early pulmonary valve replacement in children with repaired tetralogy of Fallot: assessment by cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Eur Heart J 26:2721–2727

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Oosterhof T, van Straten A, Vliegen HW, Meijboom FJ, van Dijk AP, Spijkerboer AM, Bouma BJ, Zwinderman AH, Hazekamp MG, de Roos A, Mulder BJ (2007) Preoperative thresholds for pulmonary valve replacement in patients with corrected tetralogy of Fallot using cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Circulation 116:545–551

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Frigiola A, Tsang V, Bull C, Coats L, Khambadkone S, Derrick G, Mist B, Walker F, van Doorn C, Bonhoeffer P, Taylor AM (2008) Biventricular response after pulmonary valve replacement for right ventricular outflow tract dysfunction: is age a predictor of outcome? Circulation 118:S182–S190

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Geva T (2011) Repaired tetralogy of Fallot: the roles of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in evaluating pathophysiology and for pulmonary valve replacement decision support. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 13:9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Baumgartner H, Bonhoeffer P, De Groot NM, de Haan F, Deanfield JE, Galie N, Gatzoulis MA, Gohlke-Baerwolf C, Kaemmerer H, Kilner P, Meijboom F, Mulder BJ, Oechslin E, Oliver JM, Serraf A, Szatmari A, Thaulow E, Vouhe PR, Walma E, Vahanian A, Auricchio A, Bax J, Ceconi C, Dean V, Filippatos G, Funck-Brentano C, Hobbs R, Kearney P, McDonagh T, Popescu BA, Reiner Z, Sechtem U, Sirnes PA, Tendera M, Vardas P, Widimsky P, McDonagh T, Swan L, Andreotti F, Beghetti M, Borggrefe M, Bozio A, Brecker S, Budts W, Hess J, Hirsch R, Jondeau G, Kokkonen J, Kozelj M, Kucukoglu S, Laan M, Lionis C, Metreveli I, Moons P, Pieper PG, Pilossoff V, Popelova J, Price S, Roos-Hesselink J, Uva MS, Tornos P, Trindade PT, Ukkonen H, Walker H, Webb GD, Westby J, Task Force on the Management of Grown-up Congenital Heart Disease of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) (2010) ESC Guidelines for the management of grown-up congenital heart disease (new version 2010). Eur Heart J 31:2915–2957

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Warnes CA, Williams RG, Bashore TM, Child JS, Connolly HM, Dearani JA, del Nido P, Fasules JW, Graham TP Jr, Hijazi ZM, Hunt SA, King ME, Landzberg MJ, Miner PD, Radford MJ, Walsh EP, Webb GD (2008) ACC/AHA 2008 Guidelines for the Management of Adults with Congenital Heart Disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (writing committee to develop guidelines on the management of adults with congenital heart disease). Circulation 118:e714–e833

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kilner PJ, Geva T, Kaemmerer H, Trindade PT, Schwitter J, Webb GD (2010) Recommendations for cardiovascular magnetic resonance in adults with congenital heart disease from the respective working groups of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 31:794–805

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sievers B, Kirchberg S, Bakan A, Franken U, Trappe HJ (2004) Impact of papillary muscles in ventricular volume and ejection fraction assessment by cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 6:9–16

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Winter MM, Bernink FJ, Groenink M, Bouma BJ, van Dijk AP, Helbing WA, Tijssen JG, Mulder BJ (2008) Evaluating the systemic right ventricle by CMR: the importance of consistent and reproducible delineation of the cavity. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 10:40

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Beerbaum P, Barth P, Kropf S, Sarikouch S, Kelter-Kloepping A, Franke D, Gutberlet M, Kuehne T (2009) Cardiac function by MRI in congenital heart disease: impact of consensus training on interinstitutional variance. J Magn Reson Imaging 30:956–966

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Mooij CF, de Wit CJ, Graham DA, Powell AJ, Geva T (2008) Reproducibility of MRI measurements of right ventricular size and function in patients with normal and dilated ventricles. J Magn Reson Imaging 28:67–73

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Samyn MM, Powell AJ, Garg R, Sena L, Geva T (2007) Range of ventricular dimensions and function by steady-state free precession cine MRI in repaired tetralogy of Fallot: right ventricular outflow tract patch vs. conduit repair. J Magn Reson Imaging 26:934–940

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Davlouros PA, Kilner PJ, Hornung TS, Li W, Francis JM, Moon JC, Smith GC, Tat T, Pennell DJ, Gatzoulis MA (2002) Right ventricular function in adults with repaired tetralogy of Fallot assessed with cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging: detrimental role of right ventricular outflow aneurysms or akinesia and adverse right-to-left ventricular interaction. J Am Coll Cardiol 40:2044–2052

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Alfakih K, Plein S, Thiele H, Jones T, Ridgway JP, Sivananthan MU (2003) Normal human left and right ventricular dimensions for MRI as assessed by turbo gradient echo and steady-state free precession imaging sequences. J Magn Reson Imaging 17:323–329

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Clarke CJ, Gurka MJ, Norton PT, Kramer CM, Hoyer AW (2012) Assessment of the accuracy and reproducibility of RV volume measurements by CMR in congenital heart disease. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 5:28–37

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Fratz S, Schuhbaeck A, Buchner C, Busch R, Meierhofer C, Martinoff S, Hess J, Stern H (2009) Comparison of accuracy of axial slices versus short-axis slices for measuring ventricular volumes by cardiac magnetic resonance in patients with corrected tetralogy of Fallot. Am J Cardiol 103:1764–1769

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

Hendrik G. Freling, Karolien Jaspers, Jeroen M. van Swieten, Tineke P. Willems are employees of the department of Radiology of the University Medical Center Groningen and have no conflict of interest to disclose. Kees van Wijk is an employee of Medis and therefore has a potential conflict of interest. Petronella G. Pieper is an employee of the department of Cardiology of the University Medical Center Groningen and has no conflict of interest to disclose. Karin M. Vermeulen is an employee of the department of Epidemiology of the University Medical Center Groningen and has no conflict of interest to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tineke P. Willems.

Appendix 1

Appendix 1

The technique of normalized convolution is used to estimate the spatially varying blood and muscle intensities within a user-provided epicardial contour. The voxel intensity is defined by a first order model with six variables:

$$ I(x,y) = (1 - w(x,y)) \times I_{m} (x,y) + w(x,y) \times I_{b} (x,y) $$
(3)

with:

$$ \begin{gathered} Muscle :\,I_{m} (x,y) = a_{0} + a_{1} x + a_{2} y \hfill \\Blood :\,I_{b} (x,y) = b_{0} + b_{1} x + b_{2} y \hfill \\ \end{gathered} $$
(4)

where a0, a1, a2, b0, b1 and b2 are constants that vary among scans according to the grey value distribution of the image within the epicardial contour. I m(x,y) and I b(x,y) represent the approximation of the intensity of muscle and blood, respectively, at the position (x,y) The constants are obtained with an iterative optimization procedure, during which the weight w(x,y) is initialized to either 1 or 0 using the Otsu threshold method.

The procedure is stopped when the classification w > 0.5 is unaltered between iterations or when the number of iterations exceeds ten.

Assuming a linear relationship between the fraction of blood and the intensity of the voxel (I(x,y)), the weight w(x,y) represents the fraction of blood in the voxel.

$$ {w(x,y) = \frac{{I(x,y) - I_{m} (x,y)}}{{I_{b} (x,y) - I_{m} (x,y)}}} $$
(5)

A binary classification is obtained by thresholding w(x,y). If w(x,y) is higher than the threshold value, the voxel is considered pure blood, otherwise it is defined as pure muscle. In this experiment the threshold value was set to 70 %. Blood volume measures are obtained by multiplying the number of voxels classified as blood with the voxel volume.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Freling, H.G., van Wijk, K., Jaspers, K. et al. Impact of right ventricular endocardial trabeculae on volumes and function assessed by CMR in patients with tetralogy of Fallot. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 29, 625–631 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-012-0112-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-012-0112-7

Keywords

Navigation