Skip to main content
Log in

MR Pulmonary angiography: assessment of PIOPED III data

  • Editorial Comment
  • Published:
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Hunsaker AR, Lu MT, Goldhaber SZ, Rybicki FJ (2010) Imaging in acute pulmonary embolism with special clinical scenarios. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 3(4):491–500. doi:10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.109.855981

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Remy-Jardin M, Remy J, Wattinne L, Giraud F (1992) Central pulmonary thromboembolism: diagnosis with spiral volumetric CT with the single-breath-hold technique—comparison with pulmonary angiography. Radiology 185(2):381–387

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ersoy H, Goldhaber SZ, Cai T, Luu T, Rosebrook J, Mulkern R, Rybicki F (2007) Time-resolved MR angiography: a primary screening examination of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism and contraindications to administration of iodinated contrast material. AJR Am J Roentgenol 188(5):1246–1254. doi:10.2214/AJR.06.0901

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Meaney JF, Weg JG, Chenevert TL, Stafford-Johnson D, Hamilton BH, Prince MR (1997) Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism with magnetic resonance angiography. N Engl J Med 336(20):1422–1427. doi:10.1056/NEJM199705153362004

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Gupta A, Frazer CK, Ferguson JM, Kumar AB, Davis SJ, Fallon MJ, Morris IT, Drury PJ, Cala LA (1999) Acute pulmonary embolism: diagnosis with MR angiography. Radiology 210(2):353–359

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Loubeyre P, Revel D, Douek P, Delignette A, Baldy C, Genin G, Amiel M (1994) Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR angiography of pulmonary embolism: comparison with pulmonary angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 162(5):1035–1039

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Pleszewski B, Chartrand-Lefebvre C, Qanadli SD, Dery R, Perreault P, Oliva VL, Prenovault J, Belblidia A, Soulez G (2006) Gadolinium-enhanced pulmonary magnetic resonance angiography in the diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism: a prospective study on 48 patients. Clin Imaging 30(3):166–172. doi:10.1016/j.clinimag.2005.10.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kluge A, Luboldt W, Bachmann G (2006) Acute pulmonary embolism to the subsegmental level: diagnostic accuracy of three MRI techniques compared with 16-MDCT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 187(1):W7–14. doi:10.2214/AJR.04.1814

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Stein PD, Chenevert TL, Fowler SE, Goodman LR, Gottschalk A, Hales CA, Hull RD, Jablonski KA, Leeper KV Jr, Naidich DP, Sak DJ, Sostman HD, Tapson VF, Weg JG, Woodard PK (2010) Gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography for pulmonary embolism: a multicenter prospective study (PIOPED III). Ann Intern Med 152(7):434–443. doi:10.1059/0003-4819-152-7-201004060-00008

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Woodard PK, Chenevert TL, Sostman HD, Jablonski KA, Stein PD, Goodman LR, Londy FJ, Narra V, Hales CA, Hull RD, Tapson VF, Weg JG (2011) Signal quality of single dose gadobenate dimeglumine pulmonary MRA examinations exceeds quality of MRA performed with double dose gadopentetate dimegluminedimeglumine. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging (in press)

  11. de Haen C, Cabrini M, Akhnana L, Ratti D, Calabi L, Gozzini L (1999) Gadobenate dimeglumine 0.5 M solution for injection (MultiHance) pharmaceutical formulation and physicochemical properties of a new magnetic resonance imaging contrast medium. J Comput Assist Tomogr 23(Suppl 1):S161–S168

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sostman HD, Jablonski KA, Woodard PK, Stein PD, Naidich DP, Chenevert TL, Weg JG, Hales CA, Hull RD, Goodman LR, Tapson VF (2011) Factors in the technical quality of gadolinium enhanced magnetic resonance angiography for pulmonary embolism in PIOPED III. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging (in press)

  13. Prince MR, Yucel EK, Kaufman JA, Harrison DC, Geller SC (1993) Dynamic gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional abdominal MR arteriography. J Magn Reson Imaging 3(6):877–881

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ersoy H, Rybicki FJ (2008) MR angiography of the lower extremities. AJR Am J Roentgenol 190(6):1675–1684. doi:10.2214/AJR.07.2223

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Abujudeh HH, Kaewlai R, Farsad K, Orr E, Gilman M, Shepard JA (2009) Computed tomography pulmonary angiography: an assessment of the radiology report. Acad Radiol 16(11):1309–1315. doi:10.1016/j.acra.2009.06.012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kumamaru KK, Hoppel BE, Mather RT, Rybicki FJ (2010) CT angiography: current technology and clinical use. Radiol Clin North Am 48(2):213–235, vii. doi:10.1016/j.rcl.2010.02.006

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

Dr. Rybicki has research grants from Toshiba Medical Systems Corporation, Bracco Diagnostics, and Vital Images. No part of this Editorial was funded by industry.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Frank J. Rybicki.

Additional information

Editorial comment onto the articles of Sostman et al. (doi: 10.1007/s10554-011-9820-7) and Woodard et al. (doi: 10.1007/s10554-011-9821-6).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rybicki, F.J. MR Pulmonary angiography: assessment of PIOPED III data. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 28, 313–315 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-011-9835-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-011-9835-0

Keywords

Navigation