References
Meijboom WB, Meijs MF, Schuijf JD et al (2008) Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography: a prospective, multicenter, multivendor study. J Am Coll Cardiol 52:2135–2144
Budoff MJ, Dowe D, Jollis JG et al (2008) Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease: results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY (Assessment by coronary computed tomographic angiography of individuals undergoing invasive coronary angiography) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 52:1724–1732
Miller JM, Rochitte CE, Dewey M et al (2008) Diagnostic performance of coronary angiography by 64-row CT. N Engl J Med 359:2324–2336
Hadamitzky M, Freissmuth B, Meyer T et al (2009) Prognostic value of coronary computed tomographic angiography for prediction of cardiac events in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2:404–411
Patel MR, Peterson ED, Dai D et al (2010) Low diagnostic yield of elective coronary angiography. N Engl J Med 362:886–895
Mahajan N, Polavaram L, Vankayala H et al (2010) Diagnostic accuracy of myocardial perfusion imaging and stress echocardiography for the diagnosis of left main and triple vessel coronary artery disease: a comparative meta-analysis. Heart 96:956–966
Blankstein R, Di Carli MF (2010) Integration of coronary anatomy and myocardial perfusion imaging. Nat Rev Cardiol 7:226–236
Tonino PA, Fearon WF, De Bruyne B et al (2010) Angiographic versus functional severity of coronary artery stenoses in the FAME study fractional flow reserve versus angiography in multivessel evaluation. J Am Coll Cardiol 55:2816–2821
Kajander S, Joutsiniemi E, Saraste M et al (2010) Cardiac positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging accurately detects anatomically and functionally significant coronary artery disease. Circulation 122:603–613
Achenbach S, Moselewski F, Ropers D et al (2004) Detection of calcified and noncalcified coronary atherosclerotic plaque by contrast-enhanced, submillimeter multidetector spiral computed tomography: a segment-based comparison with intravascular ultrasound. Circulation 109:14–17
Krug KB, Bovenschulte H, Geissler HJ et al (2009) In vivo measurements of coronary blood flow using 16-slice multidetector spiral computed tomography (MDCT) in a porcine model. Rofo 181:220–229
Steigner ML, Mitsouras D, Whitmore AG et al (2010) Iodinated contrast opacification gradients in normal coronary arteries imaged with prospectively ECG-gated single heart beat 320-detector row computed tomography. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 3:179–186
Lackner K, Bovenschulte H, Stutzer H et al. (2010) In vitro measurements of flow using multislice computed tomography (MSCT). Int J Cardiovasc Imaging (in press)
Blankstein R, Shturman LD, Rogers IS et al (2009) Adenosine-induced stress myocardial perfusion imaging using dual-source cardiac computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 54:1072–1084
Frauenfelder T, Boutsianis E, Schertler T et al (2007) In vivo flow simulation in coronary arteries based on computed tomography datasets: feasibility and initial results. Eur Radiol 17:1291–1300
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Editorial comment on to the article of Lackner et al. (doi:10.1007/s10554-010-9728-7).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Choi, JH., Choe, Y.H. & Min, J.K. From stenosis imaging to functional imaging: a new horizon of coronary computed tomography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 27, 1045–1047 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-010-9751-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-010-9751-8