Skip to main content
Log in

Myocardial scar extent evaluated by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in ICD patients: relationship to spontaneous VT during long-term follow-up

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy have an increased risk for ventricular arrhythmia, since myocardial infarction can be the substrate for re-entrant arrhythmias. Contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) has proven to reliably quantify myocardial infarction. Aim of our study was to evaluate correlations between functional and contrast-enhanced CMR findings and spontaneous ventricular tachy-arrhythmias in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy who underwent implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy. Forty-one patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and indication for ICD therapy underwent cine and late gadolinium enhancement CMR for quantification of left ventricular volumes, function and scar tissue before subsequent implantation of ICD device. During a follow-up period of 1184 ± 442 days 68 monomorphic and 14 polymorphic types of ventricular tachycardia (VT) could be observed in 12 patients. Patients with monomorphic VT had larger scar volumes (25.3 ± 11.3 vs. 11.8 ± 7.5% of myocardial mass, P < 0.05) than patients with polymorphic VT. Moreover myocardial infarction involved more segments in the LAD perfusion territory (86 vs. 20%, P < 0.05) than in patients with polymorphic VT. Patients with spontaneous monomorphic VT during the long-term follow-up period had more infarcted tissue, which was more often present in the LAD perfusion territory than patients with polymorphic events. These data strengthen the diagnostic benefit of CMR in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. CMR may be used for better risk stratification in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy undergoing ICD therapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. de Bakker JM, van Capelle FJ, Janse MJ, Wilde AA, Coronel R, Becker AE, Dingermans KP, van Hemel NM, Hauer RN (1988) Reentry as a cause of ventricular tachycardia in patients with chronic ischemic heart disease: elektrophysiologic and anatomic correlation. Circulation 88:589–606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Stevenson WG, Friedman PL, Sager PT, Saxon LA, Kokovic D, Harada T, Wiener I, Khan H (1997) Exploring postinfarction reentrant ventricular tachycardia with entrainment mapping. J Am Coll Cardiol 29:1180–1189

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Zipes DP, Wellens HJ (1998) Sudden cardiac death. Circulation 98:2334–2351

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Brunckhorst CB, Delacretaz E, Soejima K, Maisel WH, Friedman PL, Stevenson WG (2004) Identification of the ventricular tachycardia isthmus after infarction by pace mapping. Circulation 110:652–659

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mason JW, for the Electrophysiologic Study versus Electrocardiographic Monitoring Investigators (1993) A comparison of electrophysiologic testing with Holter monitoring to predict antiarrhythmic-drug efficacy for ventricular tachycardias. N Engl J Med 329:445–458

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kim RJ, Fieno DS, Parrish TB, Harris K, Chen EL, Simonetti O, Bundy J, Finn JP, Klocke FJ, Judd RM (1999) Relationship of MRI delayed contrast enhancement to tissue injury, infarct age, and contractile function. Circulation 100:1992–2002

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Marholdt H, Wagner A, Judd RM, Sechtem U (2002) Assessment of myocardial viability by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Heart J 23:602–619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Grebe O, Paetsch I, Kestler HA, Herkommer B, Schnackenburg B, Hombach V, Fleck E, Nagel E (2003) Optima acquisition parameters for contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging after chronic myocardial infarction. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 5:575–587

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Amado LC, Gerber BL, Gupta SN, Rettmann DW, Szarf G, Schock R, Nasir K, Kraitchman DL, Lima JA (2004) Accurate and objective infarct sizing by contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in a canine myocardial infarction model. J Am Coll Cardiol 44:2383–2389

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Klein C, Nekolla SG, Bengel FM, Momose M, Sammer A, Haas F, Schnackenburg B, Delius W, Mudra H, Wolfram D, Schwaiger M (2002) Assessment of myocardial viability with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: a comparison with positron emission tomography. Circulation 105:162–167

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Adabag AS, Maron BJ, Appelbaum E, Harrigan CJ, Buros JL, Gibson CM, Lesser JR, Hanna CA, Udelson JE, Manning WJ, Maron MS (2008) Occurrence and frequency of arrhythmias in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in relation to delayed contrast enhancement on cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Am Coll Cardiol 51:1369–1374

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bogun F, Desjardins B, Good E, Gupta S, Crawford T, Oral H, Ebinger M, Pelosi F, Chugh A, Jongnarangsin K, Morady F (2009) Delayed-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in nonischemic cardiomyopathy: utility for identifying the ventricular arrhythmia substrate. J Am Coll Cardiol 53:1138–1145

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Schmidt A, Azevedo CF, Cheng A, Gupta SN, Bluemke DA, Foo TK, Gerstenblith G, Weiss RG, Marbán E, Tomaselli GF, Lima AC, Wu KC (2007) Infarct tissue heterogeneity by magnetic resonance imaging identifies enhanced cardiac arrhythmia susceptibility in patients with left ventricular dysfunction. Circulation 115:2006–2014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Fernandes VRS, Wu KC, Rosen BD, Schmidt A, Lardo AC, Osman N, Halperin HR, Tomaselli G, Berger R, Bluemke DA, Marbán E, Lima JAC (2007) Enhanced infarct border zone function and altered mechanical activation predict inducibility of monomorphic ventricular tachycardia in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. Radiology 245:712–719

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Moss AJ, Hall WJ, Cannom DS, Daubert JP, Higgins SL, Lein H, Levine JH, Saksena S, Waldo AL, Wilber D, Brown MW, Heo M, Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial Investigators (1996) Improved survival with an implanted defibrillator in patients with coronary disease at high risk for ventricular arrhythmia. N Engl J Med 335:1933–1940

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Moss AJ, Zareba W, Hall WJ, Klein H, Wilber DJ, Cannom DS, Daubert JP, Higgins SL, Brown MW, Andrews ML (2002) Prophylactic implantation of a defibrillator in patients with myocardial infarction and reduced ejection fraction. N Engl J Med 346:877–883

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hunt SA, Abraham WT, Chin MH, et al. ACC/AHA 2005 Guideline update for the diagnosis and management of chronic heart failure in the adult: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines (Writing Committee to Update the 2001 guidelines for the evaluation and management of Heart Failure). Circulation 2005; 112: 1825–1852

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hombach V, Grebe O, Merkle N, Waldenmaier S, Höher M, Kochs M, Wöhrle J, Kestler HA (2005) Sequelae of acute myocardial infarction regarding cardiac structure and function and their prognostic significance as assessed by magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Heart J 26:549–557

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bernhardt P, Spiess J, Levenson B, Pilz G, Höfling B, Hombach V, Strohm O (2009) Combined assessment of myocardial perfusion and late gadolinium enhancement in patients after percutaneous coronary intervention or bypass grafts: a multicenter study of an integrated cardiovascular magnetic resonance protocol. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2:1292–1300

    Google Scholar 

  20. Cerqueria MD, Weissman NJ, Dilsizian V et al (2002) Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart: a statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac imaging committee of the council on clinical cardiology of the American heart association. Circulation 105:539–542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wu KC, Weiss RG, Thiemann DR, Kitagawa K, Schmidt A, Dalal D, Shenghan L, Bluemke DA, Gerstenblith G, Marbán E, Tomaselli GF, Lima JAC (2008) Late gadolinium enhancement by cardiovascular magnetic resonance heralds and adverse prognosis in nonischemic cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol 51:2414–2421

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hombach V, Merkle N, Torzewski J, Kraus JM, Kunze M, Zimmermann O, Kestler HA, Wöhrle J (2009) Electrocardiographic and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging parameters as predictors of a worse outcome in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. Eur Heart J 30:2011–2018

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Assomull RG, Prasad SK, Lyne J, Smith G, Burman ED, Khan M, Sheppard MN, Poole-Wilson PA, Pennell DJ (2006) Cardiovascular magnetic resonance, fibrosis, and prognosis in dilated cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol 48:1977–1985

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Roes SD, Borleffs JW, van der Geest RJ, Westenberg JJM, Marsan NA, Kaandorp TAM, Reiber JHC, Zeppenfeld K, Lamb HJ, der Roos A, Schalij MJ, Bax JJ (2009) Infarct tissue heterogeneity assessed with contrast-enhanced MRI predicts spontaneous ventricular arrhythmia in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2:183–190

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Detsky JS, Paul G, Dick AJ, Wright GA (2009) Reproducible classification of infarct heterogeneity using fuzzy clustering on multicontrast delayed enhancement magnetic resonance images. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 28:1606–1614

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Yokota H, Heidary S, Katikireddy CK, Nguyen P, Pauly PM, McConnell MV, Yang PC (2008) Quantitative characterization of myocardial infarction by cardiovascular magnetic resonance predicts future cardiovascular events in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 10:17

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Bolick DR, Hackel DB, Reimer KA, Ideker R (1986) Quantitative analysis of myocardial infarct structure in patients with ventricular tachycardia. Circulation 74:1266–1279

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Bernhardt.

Additional information

Peter Bernhardt and Sascha Stiller authors contributed equally to the manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bernhardt, P., Stiller, S., Kottmair, E. et al. Myocardial scar extent evaluated by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in ICD patients: relationship to spontaneous VT during long-term follow-up. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 27, 893–900 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-010-9726-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-010-9726-9

Keywords

Navigation