Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Preliminary report on a sonographic method to determine the location of the intimal breach in Stanford type B aortic dissection

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Using a defined angle T, which can be measured noninvasively using Doppler ultrasound, we aim to determine the location of the intimal breach in Stanford type B aortic dissection (AD) and estimate the risk of AD using that measurement. Our subjects included 86 healthy volunteers, 60 hypertensive patients, and 42 patients with Stanford type B AD. We used dual functional color Doppler ultrasound to locate the central point of the high-speed flow zone within the descending aorta, and then calculated the angle T, using the law of cosines. In addition, we measured the degree of distortion within the descending aorta using Line BD, defined as the distance from the lateral edge of the left subclavian artery (LSA) to the center of the breach in the intima in AD. The value of T was approximately 24° ± 3° and was constant across all 3 groups. In addition, the increase in BD distance corresponded to increased distortion in the descending aorta between the LSA and the region of aortic artery ligament (RAALE). We found that when the preoperative BD was less than 2.6 cm, the aortic arch could be straightened, using a stent-graft, to approximate the normal aorta. When the preoperative BD is less than 2.6 cm, the aortic arch can be corrected using a stent. In addition, since the T angle is constant, we speculate that it can be used to predict the risk of intimal breach and estimate its location using digital subtraction angiography (DSA) to guide surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

RAALE:

Aortic artery ligament extension

AD:

Aortic dissection

DSA:

Digital subtraction angiography

LSA:

Left subclavian artery

References

  1. Prisant LM, Prasad NVR (2005) Aortic dissection. J Clin (Greenwich) Hypertens 7:367–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Tang J, Jing Z, Xiong J et al (2004) Relationship between undulate hypertension and divided artery middle membrane. Chin J Exp Surg 21:604–605

    Google Scholar 

  3. Wheat MWJR (1980) Acute dissecting aneurysms of the aorta: diagnosis and treatment-1979. Am Heart J 99(3):373–387

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hu JL, Xu LP (2000) The basic knowledge of rheology. Beijing Science Press, Beijing, pp 1–38

    Google Scholar 

  5. Juvonen T, Ergin MA, Galla JD et al (1999) Risk factors for rupture of chronic type B dissections. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 117:776–786

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Frangos SG, Gahtan V, Sumpio B (1999) Localization of atherosclerosis: role of hemodynamics. Arch Surg 134:1142–1149

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lh Z, Dong SH, Li C, Yang CY, Wen AH, Chen Y (2001) Ambulatory pulse pressure in hypertensive patients with carotid artery atherosclerosis studies. China J Arter 02:145

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ye Y, Zhao BZ, Tang JD (2007) Color Doppler ultrasound in the study of hemodynamics of descending aorta. J China Clin Med Imaging 02:104–105

    Google Scholar 

  9. Effmann E, Whitman SA, Smith BP (1986) Aortic arch development. Radiographics 6:1065–1189

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Eagle KA, Isselbacher EM, DeSanctis RW (2002) Cocaine-related aortic dissection in perspective. Circulation 105:1529

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhong M, Su H, Yue X, Zhao J, Zhang Y, Zhang W (2005) The relationship of essential hypertension and aortic dissection. Chin J Arter 13:491–493

    Google Scholar 

  12. Shimojo M, Tsuda N, Iwasaka T, Inada M (1991) Age-related changes in aortic elasticity determined by gated radionuclide angiography in patients with systemic hypertension or healed myocardial infarcts and in normal subjects. Am J Cardiol 68:950–953

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Marui A, Mochizuki T, Mitsui N et al (1999) Toward the best treatment for uncomplicated patients with type B acute aortic dissection: a consideration for sound surgical indication. Circulation 100:II275–II280

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Masuda Y, Yamada Z, Morooka N, Watanabe S, Inagaki Y (1991) Prognosis of patients with medically treated aortic dissection. Circulation 84:III7–III13

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Glower DD, Fann JI, Speier RH et al (1990) Comparison of medical and surgical therapy for uncomplicated descending aortic dissection. Circulation 82:IV39–IV46

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Haverich A, Miller DC, Scott WC, Mitchell RS, Oyer PE, Stinson EB (1985) Acute and chronic aortic dissections: determinates of long-term outcome for operative survivors. Circulation 72:II22–II34

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sueyoshi E, Sakamoto I, Hayashi K, Yamaguchi T, Imada T (2004) Growth rate of aortic diameter in patients with type B aortic dissection during the chronic phase. Circulation 110:II256–II261

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jingdong Tang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tang, J., Wang, Y., Hang, W. et al. Preliminary report on a sonographic method to determine the location of the intimal breach in Stanford type B aortic dissection. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 27, 83–90 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-010-9663-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-010-9663-7

Keywords

Navigation