Skip to main content
Log in

Prognostic value of dobutamine stress echocardiography in octogenarians

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The prognostic value of dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) for risk stratification of patients aged ≥80 years is not clearly defined. A follow-up of 3 ± 2 years for major cardiac events and all-cause mortality was obtained in 227 patients, age ≥80 years, who underwent DSE for known or suspected coronary artery disease. Stress function index (SFI), calculated as the ratio of peak wall motion score index to left ventricular ejection fraction, was analyzed both as continuous variable and categorized using the mean value of 5 as the cut-off. Only 95 patients (42%) of this group underwent a cycloergometer exercise stress test (EST). During DSE 118 patients developed inducible ischemia; SFI was 4.9 ± 2.6 and 60 subjects showed a value higher than 5. EST gave a positive result in 12 patients and a negative result in 8 patients; it was inconclusive for inadequate increase in heart rate in 75 (79%) subjects. Advanced age (HR: 1.184/year, 95% CI: 1.073–1.306, p = 0.001) and SFI ≥ 5 (HR: 2.682, 95% CI: 1.429–5.035, p = 0.002) were independent predictors of all-cause mortality; advanced age (HR: 1.252/year, 95% CI: 1.064–1.473, p = 0.007), SFI ≥ 5 (HR: 3.181, 95% CI: 1.174–8.621, p = 0.02) and presence of left bundle branch block (HR: 3.060, 95% CI: 1.057–8.862, p = 0.039) independently predicted an increased occurrence of major cardiac events. No parameter derived from EST showed an independent prognostic role. DSE showed a significant prognostic value in octogenarians, both for all-cause mortality and major cardiac events.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lye M, Donnellan C (2000) Heart disease in the elderly. Heart 84:560–566

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Biagini E, Elhendy A, Schinkel AF et al (2005) Long-term prediction of mortality in elderly persons by dobutamine stress echocardiography. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 60:1333–1338

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Riley CP, Oberman A, Lampton TD, Hurst DC (1970) Submaximal exercise testing in a random sample of an elderly population. Circulation 42:43–52

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Anthopoulos LP, Bonou MS, Kardaras FG et al (1996) Stress echocardiography in elderly patients with coronary artery disease: applicability, safety and prognostic value of dobutamine and adenosine echocardiography in elderly patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 28:52–59

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Poldermans D, Fioretti PM, Boersma E et al (1994) Dobutamine-atropine stress echocardiography in elderly patients unable to perform an exercise test. Hemodynamic characteristics, safety, and prognostic value. Arch Intern Med 154:2681–2686

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hiro J, Hiro T, Reid CL, Ebrahimi R, Matsuzaki M, Gardin JM (1997) Safety and results of dobutamine stress echocardiography in women versus men and in patients older and younger than 75 years of age. Am J Cardiol 80:1014–1020

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Poldermans D, Fioretti PM, Boersma E et al (1999) Long-term prognostic value of dobutamine-atropine stress echocardiography in 1737 patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease: a single-center experience. Circulation 99:757–762

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sicari R, Pasanisi E, Venneri L, Landi P, Cortigiani L, Picano E (2003) Stress echo results predict mortality: a large-scale multicenter prospective international study. J Am Coll Cardiol 41:589–595

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Armstrong WF, Zoghbi WA (2005) Stress echocardiography: current methodology and clinical applications. J Am Coll Cardiol 45:1739–1747

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bangalore S, Yao SS, Chaudhry FA (2005) Stress function index, a novel index for risk stratification and prognosis using stress echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 18:1335–1342

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Xu B, Li JJ, Yang YJ et al (2007) Age-based clinical and angiographic outcomes after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation in patients with coronary artery disease. Chin Med J (Engl) 120:447–451

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rathore S, Rhys J, Buchalter MB, Gerning NO, Groves PH, Penny W (2006) Impact of age on the outcomes of women following percutaneous coronary intervention in the bare-metal stent era. J Interv Cardiol 19:245–249

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Messinger-Rapport B, Pothier Snader CE, Blackstone EH, Yu D, Lauer MS (2003) Value of exercise capacity and heart rate recovery in older people. J Am Geriatr Soc 51:63–68

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Era P, Schroll M, Hagerup L, Schultz-Larsen JK (2001) Changes in bicycle ergometer test performance and survival in men and women from 50 to 60 and from 70 to 80 years of age: two longitudinal studies in the Glostrup (Denmark) population. Gerontology 47:136–144

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Myers J, Prakash M, Froelicher V, Do D, Partington S, Atwood JE (2002) Exercise capacity and mortality among men referred for exercise testing. N Engl J Med 346:793–801

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Prakash M, Myers J, Froelicher VF et al (2001) Clinical and exercise test predictors of all-cause mortality: results from > ; 6, 000 consecutive referred male patients. Chest 120:1003–1013

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kallinen M, Kauppinen M, Era P, Heikkinen E (2006) The predictive value of exercise testing for survival among 75-year-old men and women. Scand J Med Sci Sports 16:237–244

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Tsutsui JM, Xie F, Cloutier D, Kalvaitis S, Elhendy A, Porter TR (2008) Real-time dobutamine stress myocardial perfusion echocardiography predicts outcome in the elderly. Eur Heart J 29:377–385

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Cortigiani L, Bigi R, Sicari R, Landi P, Bovenzi F, Picano E (2007) Prognostic implications of dipyridamole or dobutamine stress echocardiography for evaluation of patients > or = 65 years of age with known or suspected coronary heart disease. Am J Cardiol 99:1491–1495

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Baudhuin T, Marwick T, Melin J, Wijns W, D’Hondt AM, Detry JM (1993) Diagnosis of coronary artery disease in elderly patients: safety and efficacy of dobutamine echocardiography. Eur Heart J 14:799–803

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Chaudhry FA, Qureshi EA, Yao SS, Bangalore S (2007) Risk stratification and prognosis in octogenarians undergoing stress echocardiographic study. Echocardiography 24:851–859

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Solomon SD, Anavekar N, Skali H et al (2005) Influence of ejection fraction on cardiovascular outcomes in a broad spectrum of heart failure patients. Circulation 112:3738–3744

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francesca Innocenti.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Innocenti, F., Totti, A., Baroncini, C. et al. Prognostic value of dobutamine stress echocardiography in octogenarians. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 27, 65–74 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-010-9655-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-010-9655-7

Keywords

Navigation