Abstract
The reproducibility, interobserver and intraobserver variability of brachial artery flow-mediated dilation (FMD) has previously been reported. However, no study has compared the brachial artery FMD, detected by ultrasonography, simultaneously with reference imaging technique. The aim of this study was to assess the precision and accuracy of ultrasonography in detecting FMD compared to angiography. The study population consisted of 40 patients (13 females, mean age 56 ± 8 years) who underwent elective diagnostic coronary angiography. The ultrasonographic FMD (USFMD) measurements have been performed according to established standards with the subjects laying on the angiography table. Selective left brachial angiography was performed while ultrasonographic measurements of the brachial artery were obtained at baseline and during reactive hyperemia. To assess precision, USFMD was compared with angiographic FMD (AGFMD) by linear regression. The accuracy of the ultrasonographic measurement in comparison to the angiographic measurement was assessed by the Bland and Altman analysis. The mean ± SD of the testing USFMD and AGFMD measurements were 14.1 ± 7.3 and 14.7 ± 7.8%, respectively. Linear regression indicated a high correlation (r = 0.93, P < 0.0001) between ultrasonographic and angiographic measures, with a standard error of estimate of 2.7%. Agreement between measurements was reasonable (95% of limits of agreement, −5.481 to 4,674%). Ultrasonography seems to be reliable technique in detecting FMD.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Celermajer DS, Sorensen KE, Gooch VM et al (1992) Non-invasive detection of endothelial dysfunction in children and adults at risk of atherosclerosis. Lancet 340:1111–1115
Sorensen KE, Celermajer DS, Spiegelhalter DJ et al (1995) Non-invasive measurement of human endothelium dependent arterial responses: accuracy and reproducibility. Br Heart J 74:247–253
Welsch MA, Allen JD, Geaghan JP (2002) Stability and reproducibility of brachial artery flow-mediated dilation. Med Sci Sports Exerc 34:960–965
Simova I, Nossikoff A, Denchev S (2008) Interobserver and intraobserver variability of flow-mediated vasodilatation of the brachial artery. Echocardiography 25:77–83
Liang YL, Teede H, Kotsopoulos D et al (1998) Non-invasive measurements of arterial structure and function: repeatability, interrelationships and trial sample size. Clin Sci 95:669–679
de Roos NM, Bots ML, Katan MB (2001) Replacement of dietary saturated fatty acids by trans fatty acids lowers serum HDL cholesterol and impairs endothelial function in healthy men and women. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 21:1233–1237
de Roos NM, Bots ML, Schouten EG et al (2003) Within-subject variability of flow-mediated vasodilation of the brachial artery in healthy men and women: implications for experimental studies. Ultrasound Med Biol 29:401–406
Malik J, Wichterle D, Haas T et al (2004) Repeatability of noninvasive surrogates of endothelial function. Am J Cardiol 94:693–696
Corretti MC, Anderson TJ, Benjamin EJ et al (2002) International brachial artery reactivity task force. Guidelines for the ultrasound assessment of endothelial-dependent flow-mediated vasodilation of the brachial artery: a report of the international brachial artery reactivity task force. J Am Coll Cardiol 39:257–265
Sejda T, Pit’ha J, Svandová E et al (2005) Limitations of non-invasive endothelial function assessment by brachial artery flow-mediated dilatation. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging 25:58–61
West SG, Wagner P, Schoemer SL et al (2004) Biological correlates of day-to-day variation in flow-mediated dilation in individuals with Type 2 diabetes: a study of test-retest reliability. Diabetologia 47:1625–1631
Hijmering ML, Stroes ES, Pasterkamp G et al (2001) Variability of flow mediated dilation: consequences for clinical application. Atherosclerosis 157:369–373
Magnussen CG, Fryer J, Venn A et al (2006) Evaluating the use of a portable ultrasound machine to quantify intima-media thickness and flow-mediated dilation: agreement between measurements from two ultrasound machines. Ultrasound Med Biol 32:1323–1329
Benjamin EJ, Larson MG, Keyes MJ et al (2004) Clinical correlates and heritability of flow-mediated dilation in the community: the Framingham heart study. Circulation 109:613–619
Hardie KL, Kinlay S, Hardy DB et al (1997) Reproducibility of brachial ultrasonography and flow-mediated dilatation (FMD) for assessing endothelial function. Aust NZ J Med 27:649–652
Baile EM, Paré PD, D’yachkova Y et al (1999) Effect of contrast media on coronary vascular resistance: contrast-induced coronary vasodilation. Chest 116:1039–1045
Limbruno U, Petronio AS, Amoroso G et al (2000) The impact of coronary artery disease on the coronary vasomotor response to nonionic contrast media. Circulation 101:491–497
Myers SI, Wang L, Liu F et al (2006) Iodinated contrast induced renal vasoconstriction is due in part to the downregulation of renal cortical and medullary nitric oxide synthesis. J Vasc Surg 44:383–391
Conflict of interest statement
None of the authors had a conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pala, S., Kahveci, G., Akcakoyun, M. et al. Reliability of ultrasonography in detecting flow mediated dilation. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 25, 705–711 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-009-9475-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-009-9475-9