Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Left ventricular aneurysm in the scope of gated perfusion SPECT: accuracy of detection and ejection fraction calculation

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose The objective of this trial was to investigate the capacity of gated perfusion SPECT (GPS) to detect left ventricular aneurysm (ANV) by comparing QGS and 4D-MSPECT (4DM) algorithms with radionuclide ventriculography (RVG). Secondarily, the comparison of GPS ejection fraction (EF) measurements with those of contrast left ventriculography (LVG) and RVG was aimed. Methods Twenty-five patients with ANV confirmed by LVG were studied. The patients underwent RVG and rest Tc-99m-tetrofosmin GPS 1 week after LVG. A 9-segment model was used both in RVG and GPS evaluation. Aneurysm was defined by scoring the wall motion (WM) and phase analysis in RVG; perfusion, wall thickening and WM in GPS. Results The detection rate of ANV was 96%, 84% and 52% for RVG, QGS and 4DM, respectively. The LVG mean EF (43.52% ± 16.93%) was significantly higher (P < 0.01) than those of RVG (29.40% ± 10.90), QGS (30.04% ± 13.25%) and 4DM (34.92% ± 13.01%). Moderate to high EF correlation values were obtained between LVG and GPS (r = 0.71–0.79) and GPS–RVG (r = 0.69). There was no significant EF difference between the radionuclide methods except between 4DM–EF and RVG–EF (5.52%, P < 0.05). Wide Bland–Altman limits were observed between the radionuclide methods in EF comparisons (range: 30.5–38.5%). Conclusion GPS seems to have a role in the non-invasive investigation of ANV. QGS–GPS proved to be more reliable (84%) than 4DM–GPS (52%) in the ANV detection. The localization and the extent of the aneurysm itself as well as perfusion and function of adjacent segments may affect aneurysm diagnosis by means of GPS. RVG, QGS–GPS and 4DM–GPS seem not to be interchangeable for routine EF calculation in ANV patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rigo P, Murray M, Strauss HW et al (1974) Scintiphotographic evaluation of patients with suspected left ventricular aneurysm. Circulation 5:985–991

    Google Scholar 

  2. Friedman MI, Cantor RE (1979) Reliability of gated heart scintigrams for detection of left ventricular aneurysm: concise communication. J Nucl Med 20:720–723

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Williams KA, Taillon LA (1996) Left ventricular function in patients with coronary artery disease assessed by gated tomographic myocardial perfusion images. Comparison with assessment by contrast ventriculography and first-pass radionuclide angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 27:173–181

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Germano G, Kiat H, Kavanagh PB et al (1995) Automatic quantification of ejection fraction from gated sestamibi SPECT. J Nucl Med 36:2138–2147

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ioannidis JP, Trikalinos TA, Danias PG (2002) Electrocardiogram-gated single-photon emission computed tomography versus cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction: a meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 39:2059–2068

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Vourvouri EC, Poldermans D, Bax JJ et al (2001) Evaluation of left ventricular function and volumes in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy: gated single-photon emission computed tomography versus two-dimensional echocardiography. Eur J Nucl Med 28:1610–1615

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Higuchi T, Nakajima K, Taki J, Kinuya S, Bunko H, Tonami N et al (2001) Assessment of left ventricular systolic and diastolic function based on the edge detection method with myocardial ECG-gated SPET. Eur J Nucl Med 28:1512–1516

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Abe M, Kazatani Y, Fukuda H et al (2000) Left ventricular volumes, ejection fraction, and regional wall motion calculated with gated technetium-99m tetrofosmin SPECT in reperfused acute myocardial infarction at super-acute phase: comparison with left ventriculography. J Nucl Cardiol 7:569–574

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Germano G, Berman D (2003) Gated SPECT. In: Iskandrian AE, Verani MS (eds) Nuclear cardiac imaging. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 121–136

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gorlin R, Klein MD, Sullivan JM (1967) Prospective correlative study of ventricular aneurysm. Mechanistic concept and clinical recognition. Am J Med 42:512–531

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Moralidis E, Spyridonidis T, Arsos G et al (2004) Tl-201 gated single photon emission computed tomographic myocardial perfusion imaging in the assessment of global and regional left ventricular function. Would it be favoured over equilibrium radionuclide angiography? Nucl Med Commun 25:665–673

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hansen CL, Goldstein RA, Berman DS (2006) Imaging guidelines for nuclear cardiology procedures. A report of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology Quality Assurance Committee: myocardial perfusion and function single photon emission computed tomography. J Nucl Cardiol 13:97–120

    Google Scholar 

  13. Botvinick EH, Dae MW, O’Connel JW (1997) Functional imaging and phase analysis of blood pool imaging. In: Gerson MC (ed) Cardiac nuclear medicine, 3rd edn. McGraw Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mangschau A (1989) Akinetic versus dyskinetic left ventricular aneurysm diagnosed by gated scintigraphy: difference in surgical outcome. Ann Thorac Surg 47:746–751

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Pennell DJ, Prvulovich E (1995) Image interpretation: nuclear cardiology. British Nuclear Medicine Society, London, pp 56–79

    Google Scholar 

  16. Berman DS, Germano G (2006) Interpretation and reporting of gated myocardial perfusion SPECT. In: Berman DS, Germano G (eds) Clinical gated cardiac SPECT, 2nd edn. Blackwell Publishing, UK

    Google Scholar 

  17. Matthias Bechtel JF, Tolg R, Graf B et al (2004) High incidence of sudden death late after anterior LV-aneurysm repair. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 25:807–811

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Movahed MR, Vu J, Lizotte P (2006) Failure of gated SPECT and echocardiography to detect large apical aneurysm secondary to hyperdynamic left ventricular wall at the aneurysm neck. Cardiovasc Revasc Med 7:250–254

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Konen E, Merchant N, Gutierrez C et al (2005) True versus false left ventricular aneurysm: differentiation with MR imaging—initial experience. Radiology 236:65–70

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Versteegh MI, Lamb HJ, Bax JJ et al (2003) MRI evaluation of left ventricular function in anterior LV aneurysms before and after surgical resection. Eur J Cardiothorac 23:609–651

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wagner A, Mahrholdt H, Holly TA et al (2003) Contrast-enhanced MRI and routine single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) perfusion imaging for detection of subendocardial myocardial infarcts: an imaging study. Lancet 361:374–379

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Nakajima K, Higuchi T, Taki J et al (2001) Accuracy of ventricular volume and ejection fraction measured by gated myocardial SPECT: comparison of 4 software programs. J Nucl Med 42:1571–1578

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Abe K, Hirakawa K, Yonenaga T et al (2005) Assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction measured by quantitative gated SPECT correlation with left ventriculography and first-pass radionuclide angiography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 22:223–230

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Atsma DE, Bavelaar-Croon CD, Germano G et al (2000) Good correlation between gated single photon emission computed myocardial tomography and contrast ventriculography in the assessment of global and regional left ventricular function. Int J Card Imaging 16:447–453

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kouris K, Abdel-Dayem HM, Taha B et al (1992) Left ventricular ejection fraction and volumes calculated from dual gated SPECT myocardial imaging with 99Tcm-MIBI. Nucl Med Commun 13:648–655

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Wright GA, McDade M, Keeble W et al (2000) Quantitative gated SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging with 201Tl: an assessment of the limitations. Nucl Med Commun 21:1147–1151

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Nichols K, DePuey EG, Rozanski A (1996) Automation of gated tomographic left ventricular ejection fraction. J Nucl Cardiol 3:475–482

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Canbaz F, Basoglu T, Yapici O et al (2006) Myocardial perfusion defects with near-to-absent count reduction: a comparison of gated SPECT to radionuclide ventriculography in the determination of left ventricular function. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 22:231–241

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Chua T, Yin LC, Thiang TH et al (2000) Accuracy of the automated assessment of left ventricular function with gated perfusion SPECT in the presence of perfusion defects and left ventricular dysfunction: correlation with equilibrium radionuclide ventriculography and echocardiography. J Nucl Cardiol 7:301–311

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Wynne J, Green LH, Mann T et al (1978) Estimation of left ventricular volumes in man from biplane cineangiograms filmed in oblique projections. Am J Cardiol 41:726–732

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Yoshioka J, Hasegawa S, Yamaguchi H et al (1999) Left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction calculated from quantitative electrocardiographic-gated 99mTc-tetrofosmin myocardial SPECT. J Nucl Med 40:1693–1698

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Lipke CS, Kuhl HP, Nowak B et al (2004) Validation of 4D-MSPECT and QGS for quantification of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction from gated 99mTc-MIBI SPET: comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 31:482–490

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Nichols K, Tamis J, DePuey EG et al (1998) Relationship of gated SPECT ventricular function parameters to angiographic measurements. J Nucl Cardiol 5:295–303

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Manrique A, Faraggi M, Ve´ra P et al (1999) A 201Tl and 99mTc-MIBI gated SPECT in patients with large perfusion defects and left ventricular dysfunction. Comparison with equilibrium radionuclide angiography. J Nucl Med 40:805–809

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Lum DP, Coel MN (2003) Comparison of automatic quantification software for the measurement of ventricular volume and ejection fraction in gated myocardial perfusion SPECT. Nucl Med Commun 24:259–266

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fevziye Canbaz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Canbaz, F., Basoglu, T., Durna, K. et al. Left ventricular aneurysm in the scope of gated perfusion SPECT: accuracy of detection and ejection fraction calculation. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 24, 585–596 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-008-9298-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-008-9298-0

Keywords

Navigation