Skip to main content
Log in

Impact of intracardiac echocardiography on radiation exposure during adult congenital heart disease catheter-based interventions

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) is a widespread approach in many cardiovascular procedures in which it has the potential to reduce the fluoroscopy time and patients radiation exposure. We sought to assess the patient radiation exposure during transcatheter closure of interatrial communications with and without ICE-guidance.

Methods

In a prospective consecutive series of 25 consecutive patients who underwent transcatheter closure of interatrial communications between May and October 2005 with (15 patients) and without (10 patients) ICE-guidance in a single secondary care referral centre, we measured the dose-area product (DAP), the fluoroscopy dose-area product (FDAP), the total dose-area product (TDAP), and the mean procedural time.

Results

In patients underwent ICE-guided transcatheter closure procedure the mean fluoroscopy time, the mean DAP, mean FDAP, and mean TDAP resulted significantly lower than in control patients: 2.0  ±  0.21 (range 1.6–2.2) versus 5.05  ±  0.54 (range 4.2–5.8) minutes (P  <  0.001) , 13.72  ±  9.03 (range 11.36–14.63) versus 21.95  ±  6.93 (range 20.90–23.93) Gycm2 (P  <  0.001), 8.25  ±  1.22 (range 6.60–9.50) versus 20.15  ±  8.83 (range 18.90–20.93) Gycm2 (P  <  0.001), and 29.33  ±  1.51(range 27.16–31.00) versus 32.61  ±  2.53 (range 29.20–35.55) Gycm2 (P  <  0.01). On the contrary, the mean procedural time, was significantly higher in ICE-guided transcatheter closure patients: 30.2  ±  2.45 (range 23–40) versus 24.5  ±  2.45 (range 24–31) minutes (P = 0.03).

Conclusion

The radiation exposure during ICE-guided transcatheter closure of interatrial communications in this group of patients was quite lower than that reported in literature for such procedures and compared favourably with radiation exposure of patients in whom the intervention was performed without ICE guidance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mitchel JF, Gillam LD, Sanzobrino BW, Hirst JA, McKay RG (1995) Intracardiac ultrasound imaging during transseptal catheterization. Chest 108:104–108

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Mangrum JM, Mounsey JP, Kok LC, DiMarco JP, Haines DE (2002) Intracardiac echocardiography-guided, anatomically based radiofrequency ablation of focal atrial fibrillation originating from pulmonary veins. J Am Coll Cardiol 39:1964–1972

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hung JS, Fu M, Yeh KH, Wu CJ, Wong P (1996) Usefulness of intracardiac echocardiography in complex transseptal catheterization during percutaneous transvenous mitral commissurotomy. Mayo Clin Proc 71:134–140

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hijazi Z, Wang Z, Cao Q, Koenig P, Waight D, Lang R (2001) Transcatheter closure of atrial septal defects and patent foramen ovale under intracardiac echocardiographic guidance: feasibility and comparison with transesophageal echocardiography. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 52:194–199

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Zanchetta M, Rigatelli G, Onorato E (2003) Intracardiac echocardiography and transcranial Doppler ultrasound to guide closure of patent foramen ovale. J␣Invasive Cardiol 15:93–96

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rigatelli G (2005) Expanding the use of intracardiac echocardiography in congenital heart disease catheter-based interventions. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 18:1230–1231

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Rigatelli G, Hjiazi Z Intracardiac echocardiography guidance in cardiovascular interventions: different devices for different purposes. J Invas Cardiol (in press)

  8. Zanchetta M, Rigatelli G, Pedon L, Zennaro M, Onorato E, Maiolino P (2002) Intracardiac echocardiography during catheter-based procedures: ultrasound system, examination technique, and image presentation. Echocardiography 19:501–507

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Zanchetta M, Onorato E, Rigatelli G, Pedon L, Zennaro M, Maiolino P (2003) Intracardiac echocardiography-guided transcatheter closure of secundum atrial septal defect: a new efficient device selection method. J␣Am Coll Cardiol 42:1677–1682

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Thanopoulos BD, Laskari CV, Tsaousis GS, Zarayelyan A, Vekiou A, Papadopoulos GS (1998) Closure of atrial septal defects with the Amplatzer Occlusion device: preliminary results. J Am Coll Cardiol 31:1110–1116

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kocinaj D, Cioppa A, Ambrosini G, Tesorio T, Salemme L, Sorropago G, Rubino P, Picano E (2005) Radiation dose exposure during cardiac and peripheral arteries catheterisation. Int J Cardiol (Epub ahead of print)

  12. Geijer H, Larzon T, Popek R, Beckman KW (2005) Radiation exposure in stent-grafting of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Br J Radiol 78:906–912

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Tsalafoutas IA, Spanodimos SG, Maniatis PN, Fournarakis GM, Koulentianos ED, Tsigas DL (2005) Radiation doses to patients and cardiologists from permanent cardiac pacemaker implantation procedures. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 28:910–916

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Papadopoulou DI, Yakoumakis EN, Makri TK, Sandilos PH, Thanopoulos BD, Georgiou EK (2005) Assessment of patient radiation doses during transcatheter closure of ventricular and atrial septal defects with Amplatzer devices. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 65:434–441

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. King TD, Thompson SL, Mills NL (1978) Measurement of atrial septal defect during cardiac catheterization. Experimental and clinical results. Am J Cardiol 41:537–542

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Rao PS, Langhough R (1991) Relationship of echocardiographic, shunt flow, and angiographic size to the stretched diameter of the atrial septal defect. Am Heart J 122:505–508

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Godart F, Rey C, Francart C, et al (1993) Two-dimensional echocardiographic and color Doppler measurements of atrial septal defect, and comparison with the balloon-stretched diameter. Am J Cardiol 72:1095–1097

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Hellebrand WE, Fahey JT, Mc Gowan FX, et al (1990) Transesophageal echocardiographic guidance of transcatheter closure of atrial septal defect. Am J Cardiol 66:207–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ishii M, Kato H, Inoue O, et al (1993) Biplane transesophageal echo-Doppler studies of atrial septal defects: quantitative evaluation and monitoring for transcatheter closure. Am Heart J 125:1363–1375

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Hijazi Z, Wang Z, Cao Q, Koenig P, Waight D, Lang R (2001) Transcatheter closure of atrial septal defects and patent foramen ovale under intracardiac echocardiographic guidance: feasibility and comparison with transesophageal echocardiography. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 52:194–199

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gianluca Rigatelli.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rigatelli, G., Cardaioli, P., Roncon, L. et al. Impact of intracardiac echocardiography on radiation exposure during adult congenital heart disease catheter-based interventions. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 23, 139–142 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-006-9125-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-006-9125-4

Keywords

Navigation