Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Reproducibility of intravascular ultrasound radiofrequency data analysis: implications for the design of longitudinal studies

  • Published:
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

The purpose of this study was to assess in vivo the reproducibility of tissue characterization using spectral analysis of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) radiofrequency data (IVUS-VH).

Background

Despite the need for reproducibility data to design longitudinal studies, such information remains unexplored.

Methods and results

IVUS-VH (Volcano Corp., Rancho Cordova, USA) was performed in patients referred for elective percutaneous intervention and in whom a non-intervened vessel was judged suitable for a safe IVUS interrogation. The IVUS catheters used were commercially available catheters (20 MHz, Volcano Corp., Rancho Cordova, USA). Following IVUS-VH acquisition, and after the disengagement and re-engagement of the guiding catheter, an additional acquisition was performed using a new IVUS catheter. Fifteen patients with 16 non-significant lesions were assessed by 2 independent observers. The relative inter-catheter differences regarding geometrical measurements were negligible for both observers. The inter-catheter relative difference in plaque cross-sectional area (CSA) was 3.2% for observer 1 and 0.5% for observer 2. The limits of agreement for (observer 1 measurements) lumen, vessel, plaque and plaque burden measurements were 0.82, −1.10 mm2; 0.80, −0.66 mm2; 1.08, −0.66 mm2; and 5.83, −3.89%; respectively. Limits of agreement for calcium, fibrous, fibrolipidic and necrotic core CSA measurements were 0.22, −0.25 mm2; 1.02, −0.71 mm2; 0.61, −0.65 mm2; and 0.43, −0.38 mm2 respectively. Regarding the inter-observer agreement, the limits of agreement for lumen, vessel, plaque and plaque burden measurements were 2.61, −2.09 mm2; 2.20–3.03 mm2; 1.70, −3.04 mm2; and 9.16, −16.41%; respectively, and for calcium, fibrous, fibrolipidic and necrotic core measurements of 0.08, −0.09 mm2; 0.89, −1.28 mm2; 0.74, −1.06 mm2; and 0.16, −0.20 mm2; respectively.

Conclusions

The present study demonstrates that the geometrical and compositional output of IVUS-VH is acceptably reproducible.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Guedes A, Keller PF, L’Allier PL, Lesperance J, Gregoire J, Tardif JC (2005) Long-term safety of intravascular ultrasound in nontransplant, nonintervened, atherosclerotic coronary arteries. J Am Coll Cardiol 45:559–564

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Wenguang L, Gussenhoven WJ, Zhong Y, et al (1991) Validation of quantitative analysis of intravascular ultrasound images. Int J Card Imaging 6(3–4):247–253

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. de  Jaegere P, Mudra H, Figulla H, et al. (1998) Intravascular ultrasound-guided optimized stent deployment. Immediate and 6 months clinical and angiographic results from the Multicenter Ultrasound Stenting in Coronaries Study MUSIC Study). Eur Heart J 19:1214–1223

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Fitzgerald PJ, Oshima A, Hayase M, et al. (2000) Final results of the Can Routine Ultrasound Influence Stent Expansion CRUISE study. Circulation 102:523–530

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Jeremias A, Huegel H, Lee DP, et al. (2000) Spatial orientation of atherosclerotic plaque in non-branching coronary artery segments. Atherosclerosis 152:209–215

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kimura BJ, Russo RJ, Bhargava V, McDaniel MB, Peterson KL, DeMaria AN (1996) Atheroma morphology and distribution in proximal left anterior descending coronary artery: in vivo observations. J Am Coll Cardiol 27:825–831

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Smits PC, Pasterkamp G, Quarles van Ufford MA, et al. (1999) Coronary artery disease: arterial remodelling and clinical presentation. Heart 82:461–464

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Nissen SE, Tsunoda T, Tuzcu EM, et al. (2003) Effect of recombinant ApoA-I Milano on coronary atherosclerosis in patients with acute coronary syndromes: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 290:2292–2300

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Fang JC, Kinlay S, Beltrame J, et al. (2002) Effect of vitamins C and E on progression of transplant-associated arteriosclerosis: a randomised trial. Lancet 359:1108–1113

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Nissen SE, Tuzcu EM, Schoenhagen P, et al. (2004) Effect of intensive compared with moderate lipid-lowering therapy on progression of coronary atherosclerosis: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 291:1071–1080

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Davies MJ, Richardson PD, Woolf N, Katz DR, Mann J (1993) Risk of thrombosis in human atherosclerotic plaques: role of extracellular lipid, macrophage, and smooth muscle cell content. Br Heart J 69:377–381

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Peters RJ, Kok WE, Havenith MG, Rijsterborgh H, van der Wal AC, Visser CA (1994) Histopathologic validation of intracoronary ultrasound imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 7:230–241

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Nair A, Kuban BD, Tuzcu EM, Schoenhagen P, Nissen SE, Vince DG (2002) Coronary plaque classification with intravascular ultrasound radiofrequency data analysis. Circulation 106:2200–2206

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Rodriguez-Granillo GA, Aoki J, Ong AT, et al. (2005) Methodological considerations and approach to cross-technique comparisons using in vivo coronary plaque characterization based on intravascular ultrasound radiofrequency data analysis: insights from the Integrated Biomarker and Imaging Study (IBIS). Int J Cardiovasc Intervent 7:52–58

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Rodriguez-Granillo GA, Serruys PW, Garcia-Garcia HM, et al. Coronary artery remodelling is related to plaque composition. Heart 2005 Jun 17; (Epub ahead of print)

  16. Rodriguez-Granillo GA, Garcia-Garcia H, Mc Fadden E, et al. (2005) In vivo intravascular ultrasound-derived thin-cap fibroatheroma detection using ultrasound radiofrequency data analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 46(11):2038–2042

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Rodriguez-Granillo GA, McFadden E, Valgimigli M, et al. Coronary plaque composition of non-culprit lesions assessed by in vivo intracoronary ultrasound radio frequency data analysis, is related to clinical presentation. Am Heart J 2006; In press

  18. Rodriguez-Granillo GA, Serruys PW, Mc Fadden E, et al. (2005) First-in-man prospective evaluation of temporal changes in coronary plaque composition by in vivo ultrasound radio frequency data analysis: an integrated biomarker and imaging study (IBIS) substudy. Eurointervention 3:282–288

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1:307–310

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Takagi T, Yoshida K, Akasaka T, Hozumi T, Morioka S, Yoshikawa J (1997) Intravascular ultrasound analysis of reduction in progression of coronary narrowing by treatment with pravastatin. Am J Cardiol 79:1673–1676

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Schartl M, Bocksch W, Koschyk DH, et al. (2001) Use of intravascular ultrasound to compare effects of different strategies of lipid-lowering therapy on plaque volume and composition in patients with coronary artery disease. Circulation 104:387–392

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kawasaki M, Sano K, Okubo M, et al. (2005) Volumetric quantitative analysis of tissue characteristics of coronary plaques after statin therapy using three-dimensional integrated backscatter intravascular ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol 45:1946–1953

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Yokoyama M, Komiyama N, Courtney BK, et al. (2005) Plasma low-density lipoprotein reduction and structural effects on coronary atherosclerotic plaques by atorvastatin as clinically assessed with intravascular ultrasound radio-frequency signal analysis: a randomized prospective study. Am Heart J 150:287

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patrick W. Serruys.

Additional information

We declare that G. Rodriguez-Granillo has received a research grant from Volcano Corp. No other author has a conflict of interest to disclose.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rodriguez-Granillo, G.A., Vaina, S., García-García, H.M. et al. Reproducibility of intravascular ultrasound radiofrequency data analysis: implications for the design of longitudinal studies. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 22, 621–631 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-006-9080-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-006-9080-0

Keywords

Navigation