Skip to main content
Log in

Quantitative Effects of Different Factors on the Thermal Characteristics of New Submarine Hot Oil Pipeline During the Preheating Process

  • INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES OF OIL AND GAS
  • Published:
Chemistry and Technology of Fuels and Oils Aims and scope

Preheating is a key step for the start-up of new submarine hot oil pipelines, which is characterized by the unsteady hydraulic and thermal coupling, and affected by many factors, including the fluid flow rate and temperature of preheating medium, the properties of subsea soil, the temperature of seawater, etc. To investigate the quantitative effects on the preheating results caused by the above influential factors, simulation research is performed in this paper with a numerical methodology named DMOC-FEM established before by taking a new Chinese submarine crude oil pipeline as example. The factors studied include the flow rate and inlet temperature of preheating medium, riser, physical properties of subsea soil, temperature of seawater, etc. The results show that the preheating medium mainly warms submarine pipe walls rather than the surrounding subsea soil. Among the influencing factors, the fluid flow rate and temperature of preheating medium have the most notable and direct effect on the distribution and change of fluid temperature in the subsea pipe. That caused by other factors happens to be much lighter in comparison. Due to the excellent insulation effect of the pipe-in-pipe structure, the temperature drop happens on the subsea pipe risers can be ignored. Furthermore, among the properties of subsea soil, thermal conductivity has the greatest influence on the outlet temperature during the preheating process..

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 7.
Fig. 8.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. H. Zhang, Y. Liang, J. Ma, et al., “An improved PSO method for optimal design of subsea oil pipelines,” Ocean Eng., (141), 154-163 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. A. Hart, “A review of technologies for transporting heavy crude oil and bitumen via pipelines,” Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology, 4(3), 327-336 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Z. Yuan, Y. Wang, Y. Xie, et al., “Study improves subsea pipeline preheating,” Oil Gas J., (12), 88-94 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  4. X. Xing, D. Dou, Y. Li, et al., “Optimizing control parameters for crude pipeline preheating through numerical simulation,” Appl. Therm. Eng., 51(1), 890-898 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. S. Chakraborty, V. Talimi, “ Thermal analysis of offshore buried pipelines through expermental investigations and numerical analysis,” Proceedings of the ASME 2016 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition (IMECE2016), Phoenix, Arizona, USA (2016).

  6. S. Chakraborty, V. Talimi, Y. Muzychka, et al., “ Design of experimental and validation of model for offshore buried pipeline thermal analysis,” Proceedings of the 2016 11th International Pipeline Conference, Calgary, Alberta, Canada (2016).

  7. G. Chen, M. Zhao, B. Xu, “Thermal characteristics simulation of the commissioning process for new buried heated oil pipelines,” Adv. Mater. Res., 30(1), 610-616 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  8. H. Dong, J. Zhao, W. Zhao, et al., “Numerical study on the thermal characteristics and its influence factors of crude oil pipeline after restart,” Case Stud. Therm. Eng., 14, 100455 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. L. Wei, C. Du, J. Zhao, et al., “A three-dimensional numerical simulation of shut-down heat transfer process in overhead waxy crude oil pipeline,” Case Stud. Therm. Eng., 21, 100629 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. G. Zhou, G. Huang, C. Wang, et al., “Research on the initial state and safety of pipeline shutdown in crude oil forward and reverse transportation,” Case Stud. Therm. Eng., 22, 100733 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. G. Yu, B. Yu, D. Han, et al., “Unsteady-state thermal calculation of buried oil pipeline using a proper orthogonal decomposition reduced-order model,” Appl. Therm. Eng., 51(1), 177-189 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Y. Li, C. Wu, Y. Yu, “ Parallel computing on the preheating and commissioning of hot oil pipelines,” Proceedings of the 2013 International Conference on Advanced Information Engineering and Education Science (ICAIEES 2013), Beijing, China (2013).

  13. Q. Yuan, C. Wu, B. Yu, et al., “Study on the thermal characteristics of crude oil batch pipelining with differential outlet temperature and inconstant flow rate,” J. Pet. Sci. Eng., 160), 519-530 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Li. Zheng, M. Tang, J. Ding, et al., “ Analysis of direct timing of submarine pipeline,” Oil Gas Stor. Trans., 33(02), 20-24 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Y. Yang, S. Zeng, X. Zhong, et al., “Optimum design of preheating subsea pipe network,” Port Eng. Tech., 52(02), 63-65 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Y. Wang, N. Wei, D. Wan, et al., “Numerical simulation for preheating new submarine hot oil pipeline,” Energies, 12(18), 3518 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. T. Lu, J. Sun, P. Jiang, “The influence of ambient temperature and preheating water temperature on temperature field of soil during preheating buried hot crude oil pipeline for startup,” Acta Energiae Solars Sinica, 27(10), 1053-1057 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  18. L. Jiang, Q. Fu, Q. Zhang, “Numerical study for unsteady heat transfer of underground pipelines,” Pet. Refin. Eng., 37(5), 36-39 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  19. J. Zhang, Y. Wang, X. Wang, et al., “Study on optimizing operation of preheating commissioning for waxy crude oil pipelines,” Adv. Mech. Eng., 894256 (2014).

  20. Q. Lu, G. Ma, “Influence of hot oil pipeline preheat medium’s flowing speed on preheat time,” J. Liaoning Shihua Univ., 31(1), 28-31 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  21. A. Barletta, E. Zanchinia, S. Lazzaria, et al., “Numerical study of heat transfer from an offshore buried pipeline under steady–periodic thermal boundary conditions,” Appl. Therm. Eng., 28(10), 1168-1176 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. A. Barletta, S. Lazzari, E. Zanchini, et al., “Transient heat transfer from an offshore buried pipeline during start-up working conditions,” Heat Transfer Eng., 29(11), 942-949 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Y. Bai, J.M. Niedzwecki, M. Sanchez, “ Numerical investigation of thermal fields around subsea buried pipelines,” Proceedings of the ASME 33rd International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering, San Francisco, California, USA (2014).

  24. G. Wu, D. Li, H. Qi, “ Establishment of the model for the starting-up calculation of seafloor oil buried pipeline,” J. Xi’an Shiyou Univ. (Sci. ed.), 22(4), 96-99 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  25. H. Qi, “Study on heat transfer of shutdown and start-up of submarine oil pipeline,” Doctoral Dissertation, Daqing Petroleum Institute (2009).

  26. B. Yu, C. Li, Z. Zhang, et al., “Numerical simulation of a buried hot crude oil pipeline under normal operation,” Appl. Therm. Eng., 30(17), 2670-2679 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Y. Zhao, “Effect of pipe diameter on heat transfer characteristics of waxy crude oil pipeline during shutdown,” Case Stud. Therm. Eng. 19, 100628 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. F.J. Amp, A.D. Gosman, “Error analysis of the finite-volume method with respect to mesh type,” Numer. Heat Transfer, Part B, 57(6), 414-439 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. R. Boucetta, M. Zamoum, M. Tikobaini, “Numerical modeling of transients in gas pipeline,” Int. J. Phys. Sci., 9(9), 82-90 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Z.C. Li, X.Y. Cui, Y. Cai, “Analysis of heat transfer problems using a novel low-order FEM based on gradient weighted operation,” Int. J. Therm. Sci., 132, 52-64 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. X. Xing, G. Zhang, J. An, et al., “ Study on heat transfer characteristics of submarine double insulation pipeline,” Oil Gas Stor. Trans., 19(05), 31-34 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  32. X. Zhou, “Research on rules of heavy oil/water mixing transportation and process design methods”, Doctoral Dissertation, Southwest Petroleum University (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  33. P. Zheng, M. Wu, G. Zhang, et al., “Thermal simualtion calculation of underground oil pipeline at starting,” Sys, Simu. Tech., 5(3), 192-195 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Y. Wang, “Research on the preheating and commissioning process of subsea hot oil pipeline based on numerical simulation method,” Doctoral Dissertation, Southwest Petroleum University (2016).

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was funded by the Natural Science Basic Research Program of Shaanxi (Program No.2021JQ-593) and the Scientific Research Program Funded by the Shaanxi Provincial Education Department (Program No.18JK0629).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yong Wang or Zongming Yuan.

Additional information

Translated from Khimiya i Tekhnologiya Topliv i Masel, No. 4, pp. 66–73 July –August, 2022.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, Y., Quan, Q., Dai, K. et al. Quantitative Effects of Different Factors on the Thermal Characteristics of New Submarine Hot Oil Pipeline During the Preheating Process. Chem Technol Fuels Oils 58, 653–664 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10553-022-01433-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10553-022-01433-0

Keywords

Navigation