Skip to main content
Log in

Thermodynamic Analysis of Alternating Cyclic Steam and Flue Gas Injection for Colombian Heavy Oils

  • RESEARCH
  • Published:
Chemistry and Technology of Fuels and Oils Aims and scope

Thermodynamic efficiency indicators of equipment for alternating cyclic steam and flue gas injection to increase oil recovery and reduce adverse environmental impact were analyzed applied to Colombian heavy oils production. The equipment consisted of two subsystems: steam generation and flue gas compression. The energy carrier parameters were chosen based on the depth of the producing wells and the experimental data provided by the Colombian partner. The thermodynamic analysis involved estimation of exergy losses of the subsystems operating both separately and jointly to ensure alternating cyclic steam and flue gas injection. Various steam to flue gas injection ratios were examined over a five-day cycle. It was found that the efficiency of integrated subsystems, which is determined by minimum total exergy losses, differs drastically, depending on whether centrally or locally generated electric power is used. It was concluded that, in addition to the thermodynamic analysis, it is essential to conduct an economic analysis of the variable part of the reduced costs for implementation of the alternating cyclic steam and flue gas injection process. Economic calculations showed that the optimum technological solution would be use steam and flue gas injection ratios of 4.5:0.5 in a 5-day cycle as well as a centrally generated power supply source is used.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. M. E. Austin-Adigio, Enhancing Steam-Assisted Gravity Drainage Applications in Challenging and Non-Challenging Oil Sands Reservoirs, Calgary, Alberta (2018), p. 227.

    Google Scholar 

  2. F. M. Nasab, H. Shahandeh, and Z. Li, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 57, No. 29, 9513-9526 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. О. Ashrafi, Ph. Navarri, and O. Zamor, Chemical Engineering Transactions,74, 835-840 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  4. M. V. Kok, Y. Yildirim, and S. Akin, Energy Sources. Part. A, Utilisation and Enviromental Effects, 31, No. 5, 377-386 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. A. E. Bayat, R. Junin, R. Kharrat, et al., International Journal of Oil, Gas and Coal Technology, 9, No. 4, 394-421 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. H. Liu, H. Wang, H. Xiong, et al., Energy & Fuels, 34 (5), 5777-5787 (2020)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. S. Gupta, S. Gittins, and P. Picherack, J. Can. Pet. Technol., 44, No. 11, 8-13 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Davi M. S. de B. Lima, A. Araujo Edson, et al., Computer Aided Chemical Engineering, 38, H, 1743-1748 (2016).

  9. Russian Federation Patent No. 2338060.

  10. Russian Federation Patent No. 2597039.

  11. J. Szargut and R. Patel, Exergy [Russian translation from English], Energiya, Мoscow (1968), p. 288.

    Google Scholar 

  12. V. M. Brodyanskii and N. B. Kalinin, Inzhenerno-Fiz. Zh., 10, No. 5, 596-599 (1966).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. V. M. Brodyanskii, W. Fratzscher, and K. Mikhalek, Exergy Method and Its Application [in Russian], Khimiya, Moscow (1988), p. 279.

  14. H. D. Baehr, Technische Thermodynamik, Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1965), p. 242.

    Google Scholar 

  15. L. Goldstein, B. Hedman, D. Knowles, et al., Gas-Fired Distributed Energy Resource Technology Characterizations. Report of National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 2003, p. 226.

Download references

The work was conducted with the financial support for research from the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation within the ambit of Research and Development in Priority Areas of Development of Scientific-Technical Complex of Russia for 2014-2020 (Project No. 14.583.21.0064, Unique Project Identifier RFMEFI58317X0064).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Yu. Naletov.

Additional information

Translated from Khimiya i Tekhnologiya Topliv i Masel, No. 6, pp. 51–56, November – December, 2021.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Naletov, V.A., Glebov, M.B., Naletov, A.Y. et al. Thermodynamic Analysis of Alternating Cyclic Steam and Flue Gas Injection for Colombian Heavy Oils. Chem Technol Fuels Oils 57, 926–932 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10553-022-01330-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10553-022-01330-6

Keywords

Navigation