Skip to main content
Log in

Sample Fidelity of Formation Sampling While Drillings

  • INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES OF OIL AND GAS
  • Published:
Chemistry and Technology of Fuels and Oils Aims and scope

Formation sampling while drilling (FSWD) technology has become a research hotspot in oilfield development at home and abroad. The technology is characterized by a comparatively short operation time. Since the operation time is short, the obtained formation data are closer to the real situation in the reservoir. After the formation fluid enters the sample chamber from the sampling module, sealed, and returns from the downhole to the surface, the change in ambient temperature and pressure causes the sample volume to shrink and the sample pressure to decrease correspondingly. The change in temperature and pressure leads to irreversible phenomena such as phase transformation or degassing, which can affect the quality analysis of the sample. To avoid the phenomenon, the pressure in the sample chamber is maintained above the bubble point pressure by pre-charging nitrogen on the ground and boosting adjustment in the downhole, so that the formation sample fluid is consistent with the phase state in the original formation when it is retrieved from the ground. The described method is used to provide results close to the real parameters in the reservoir. As the pre-charged nitrogen and the final sample occupy different cavities of the same vessel, and the volume of the vessel is constant, the change in the parameters, including the sampling volume, temperature difference, and pressure difference between the ground and the well bottom, will cause a change in the pressure of the pre-charged nitrogen. Therefore, the problem of ensuring sample fidelity has become the key to sampling technology. To solve the problem, the method of combining ground pre-charged nitrogen pressure with downhole sample chamber pressurization has been introduced.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Q. Zhung and Z. Zhang, “New development of wireline logging technology abroad,” Log. Technol., 32(4), 380-384 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  2. F. G. Sanchez, A. Cartellieri, M. Meister, et al., “Fluid analysis and sampling: the next big step for logging while drilling tools,” SPE 152223, SPE Latin America and Caribbean Petroleum and Engineering Conference (2012).

  3. M. Proett, S. Eyuboglu, J. Wilson, et al., “New sampling and testing-while-drilling technology, a safe, cost-effective alternative,” SPE 140337, SPE/IADC Drilling Conference and Exhibition (2011).

  4. M. Djefel, C. Tigre, M. Proett, et al., “Potential economic value-added model using formation sampling-while-drilling in development fields,” SPE 138956, SPE Latin America and Caribbean Petroleum and Engineering Conference (2010).

  5. A. Zazovsky, “Monitoring and prediction of cleanup production during sampling,” SPE-112409-MS, SPE International Symposium and Exhibition on Formation Damage Control, Lafayette, Louisiana, USA (2008).

  6. M. Proett, J. Wilson, et al., New sampling and testing-while-drilling technology: a safe, cost-effective alternative,” SPE14033, SPE/IADC Drilling Conference and Exhibition (2011) .

  7. G. P. You, Y. Shen, X. D. Chu, Y. R. Feng, and X. S. Pang, “Study on multi-sampling technology for formation testing,” Pet. Instrum., 27(03), 65-66 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  8. M. G. Zhou, S. M. Liu, Y. R. Feng, et al., “Development and application of FCT during drilling,” Log. Technol., 32(1), 72-75 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Q. Yu, S. G. Liu, S. M. Liu, et al., “Reservoir tester (ERCT) and its application in Bohai oilfield,” Pet. Instrum., 25(6), 23-25 (2011).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Z. X. Zhao, Y. A. Han, X. Gao, et al., “SDC-I formation pressure tester while drilling,” Pet. Mash., 39(2), 52-54 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  11. G. P. You and Y. R. Feng, “Development and application of single-phase formation fluid sampler,” Log. Technol., 37(03), 310-313 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  12. F. G. Sanchez and F. Galvan, “Innovative single-phase tank technology for in-situ sample validation enhances fluid sampling integrity,” SPE/IPTC Challenging Technology and Economic Limits to Meet the Global Energy Demand, 2, 1047-1056 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  13. X. J. Gao, “Determination and correlation study of viscosity and density of crude oil related systems under high temperature and high pressure,” dissertation, Tianjin University (2016).

  14. H. G. Zhou, Y. H. Li, R. C. Wang, and H. L. Zhou, “Study on deep gas testing technology in Shengli Oilfield,” Pet. Instrum., 23(04), 49-51 (2009).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Y. P. Xu, Saturated vapor pressure of crude oil at different temperatures and its empirical formula,” Oil Gas Stor. Transp., 3, 47-50 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yang Zhang.

Additional information

Translated from Khimiya i Tekhnologiya Topliv i Masel, No. 3, pp. 94–99, May–June, 2021.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jiang, C., Zhang, Y., Sun, T. et al. Sample Fidelity of Formation Sampling While Drillings. Chem Technol Fuels Oils 57, 561–570 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10553-021-01278-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10553-021-01278-z

Keywords

Navigation