Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Oil Reservoir Sensitivities to Various Exposures

  • Published:
Chemistry and Technology of Fuels and Oils Aims and scope

The properties of Hongnan 2 block T1 oil reservoir in Xinjiang oilfield were analyzed in terms of petrological characteristics, rock granularity, clay composition, and other aspects. Experiments based on these results studied the sensitivities of the reservoir to velocity, acidity, alkalinity, stress, and water. The results showed moderate velocity sensitivity damage with an index in the range 42-56% and a critical flow velocity in the range 0.25-0.30 mL/min. Moderate and strong water sensitivities with indices varying from 52 to 65% and critical salinities from 5,000 to 10,000 mg/L were found. Water injected into a well should have salinity ≥ 10,000 mg/L to avoid water sensitivity damage. Weak sensitivity to alkalinity with an index varying from 31 to 36% with a critical pH of 8 was observed. Moderate and strong sensitivity to acidity was found for HCl fluid (15%); extremely strong, HCl (12%) + HF (3%); extremely strong, HCl (10%) + HF (3%) + HBF4 (8%); and no sensitivity, HCl (10%) + HBF4 (8%). The reservoir could be acidified by using HCl (10%) + HBF4 (8%). Significant changes in the reservoir core structure were not observed with large pressure differences. The critical pressure varied from 2 to 3.5 MPa. The permeability damage rate ranged from 13.33 to 18.68%. The stress sensitivity was weak.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shengming Hou, Shao Ran Ren, Wei Wang, et al., Feasibility Study of Air Injection for IOR in Low Permeability Oil Reservoirs of XinJiang Oilfield China, 2010, SPE 131087.

  2. Luo Juan, Pet. Explor Dev., 40, No. 4, 501-506 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. A. Shafield, Fuel, 108, 502-514 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Yang Jian-ping, Chen Wei-zhong, Tian Hong-ming, et al., Rock Soil Mech., 30, No. 12, 3588-3594 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  5. L. P. Qiao et al., J. Can. Pet. Technol., 51, No. 3, 193-197 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ye Tian. Experimental Study on Stress Sensitivity of Naturally Fractured Reservoirs, 2014, SPE-173463-STU.

  7. Xiao Wen-lian, Li Min, Zhao Jin-zhou, et al., Rock Soil Mech., 31, No. 3, 775-779 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Yu Zhong-liang, Xiong Wei, Gao Shu-sheng, et al., Acta Pet. Sin., 28, No. 4, 95-98 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Translated from Khimiya i Tekhnologiya Topliv i Masel, No. 2, pp. 67 — 70, March — April, 2018.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, FX., Liu, HL., Xu, JN. et al. Oil Reservoir Sensitivities to Various Exposures. Chem Technol Fuels Oils 54, 231–236 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10553-018-0918-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10553-018-0918-7

Keywords

Navigation