Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Intervention recommendations to improve uptake of breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening among individuals living with serious mental illness

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Cancer Causes & Control Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Few efforts have been made to inform intervention design for increasing the uptake of cancer screening in individuals living with serious mental illness (ILSMI), who have lower cancer screening rates than the general population. This qualitative study explored ILSMI’s and their care team member’s (CTM) recommendations on the design of a breast, colorectal, and cervical cancer screening intervention for ILSMI.

Methods

Twenty-five ILSMI (mean age: 71.4 years; 60% female) and 15 CTM (mean age: 45.3 years; 80% female) were recruited through purposive sampling. Semi-structured in-depth interviews were used to collect participants’ intervention suggestions. Interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim, and imported into NVivo. Content analysis and the constant comparison method were used to analyze interview data.

Results

ILSMI and CTMs provided several salient recommendations. ILSMI should receive disease-specific, logistical, and screening education, and primary care staff should receive education on psychopathology. Mental health providers and patient navigators should be considered as the primary interventionist. The intervention should be delivered where ILSMI receive medical or mental health services, receive community and government services, and/or via various digital media. The intervention should improve the collaboration, communication, and coordination between primary and mental health care. Findings also pointed to the implementation of trauma-informed cancer care and integrated care models comprising mental health care and primary cancer care.

Conclusion

These findings bring the skills, knowledge, and expertise of ILSM and their care team to intervention design for increasing colorectal, breast, and cervical cancer screening in ILSMI attending an intensive outpatient program.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The dataset analyzed during the current study are not publicly available because a) the Institutional Review Board was not informed that the data would be shared, b) participants were not informed that their data would be shared, and c) the research team is actively working on additional manuscripts from these data. The corresponding author can answer further questions about data availability.

References

  1. Grassi L, Riba M (2020) Cancer and severe mental illness: Bi-directional problems and potential solutions. Psychooncology 29:1445–1451. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.5534

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Zhuo C, Tao R, Jiang R, Lin X, Shao M (2017) Cancer mortality in patients with schizophrenia: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Psychiatry 211:7–13. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.116.195776

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. National Institute of Mental Health (2021) Mental health information. https://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/statistics/mental-illness. Accessed 20 Aug 2022

  4. American Psychiatric Association (2013) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders : DSM-5. American Psychiatric Association, Arlington, VA

  5. World Health Organization (1992) The ICD-10 Classification of Mental and Behavioural Disorders: Clinical descriptions and diagnostic guidelines. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9241544228. Accessed May 17 2023

  6. Irwin KE, Park ER, Fields LE, Corveleyn AE, Greer JA, Perez GK et al (2019) Bridge: Person-centered collaborative care for patients with serious mental illness and cancer. Oncologist 24:901–910. https://doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0488

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Clifton A, Burgess C, Clement S, Ohlsen R, Ramluggun P, Sturt J et al (2016) Influences on uptake of cancer screening in mental health service users: A qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res 16:257. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1505-4

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Kahn LS, Fox CH, Krause-Kelly J, Berdine DE, Cadzow RB (2005) Identifying barriers and facilitating factors to improve screening mammography rates in women diagnosed with mental illness and substance use disorders. Women Health 42:111–126. https://doi.org/10.1300/j013v42n03_07

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Owen C, Jessie D, De Vries RM (2002) Barriers to cancer screening amongst women with mental health problems. Health Care Women Int 23:561–566. https://doi.org/10.1080/07399330290107322

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Miller E, Lasser KE, Becker AE (2007) Breast and cervical cancer screening for women with mental illness: Patient and provider perspectives on improving linkages between primary care and mental health. Arch Womens Ment Health 10:189–197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00737-007-0198-4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Weinstein LC, LaNoue M, Hurley K, Sifri R, Myers R (2015) Using concept mapping to explore barriers and facilitators to breast cancer screening in formerly homeless women with serious mental illness. J Health Care Poor Underserved 26:908–925. https://doi.org/10.1353/hpu.2015.0104

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Leahy D, Donnelly A, Irwin K, D’Alton P (2021) Barriers and facilitators to accessing cancer care for people with significant mental health difficulties: A qualitative review and narrative synthesis. Psychooncology 30:2012–2022. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.5848

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Solmi M, Firth J, Miola A, Fornaro M, Frison E, Fusar-Poli P et al (2020) Disparities in cancer screening in people with mental illness across the world versus the general population: Prevalence and comparative meta-analysis including 4 717 839 people. Lancet Psychiatry 7:52–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2215-0366(19)30414-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kisely S, Crowe E, Lawrence D (2013) Cancer-related mortality in people with mental illness. JAMA Psychiat 70:209–217. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. U.S Preventive Services Task Force (2021) Colorectal cancer: Screening. https://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/recommendation/colorectal-cancer-screening. Accessed 22 Feb 2022

  16. U.S Preventive Services Task Force (2021) Cervical cancer: Screening. https://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/recommendation/cervical-cancer-screening. Accessed 22 Feb 2022

  17. U.S Preventive Services Task Force (2016) Breast cancer: Screening. https://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/recommendation/breast-cancer-screening. Accessed 22 Feb 2022

  18. Strunz M, Jiménez NP, Gregorius L, Hewer W, Pollmanns J, Viehmann K et al (2022) Interventions to promote the utilization of physical health care for people with severe mental illness: a scoping review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20010126

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Barley EA, Borschmann RD, Walters P, Tylee A (2016) Interventions to encourage uptake of cancer screening for people with severe mental illness. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 9:CD009641–CD009641. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009641.pub3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Abuelo C, Ashburner JM, Atlas SJ, Knudsen A, Morrill J, Corona P et al (2020) Colorectal cancer screening patient navigation for patients with mental illness and/or substance use disorder: Pilot randomized control trial. J Dual Diagn 16:438–446. https://doi.org/10.1080/15504263.2020.1802542

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Weinstein L, LaNoue M, Hurley K, Payton C, Sifri R, Myers R (2019) Feasibility pilot outcomes of a mammography decision support and navigation intervention for women with serious mental illness living in supportive housing settings. J Prim Care Community Health 10:2150132719867587. https://doi.org/10.1177/2150132719867587

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Fujiwara M, Inagaki M, Shimazu T, Kodama M, So R, Matsushita T et al (2019) A randomised controlled trial of a case management approach to encourage participation in colorectal cancer screening for people with schizophrenia in psychiatric outpatient clinics: Study protocol for the J-SUPPORT 1901 (ACCESS) study. BMJ Open 9:e032955–e032955. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032955

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Fujiwara M, Yamada Y, Shimazu T, Kodama M, So R, Matsushita T et al (2021) Encouraging participation in colorectal cancer screening for people with schizophrenia: A randomized controlled trial. Acta Psychiatr Scand 144:318–328. https://doi.org/10.1111/acps.13348

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Yamada Y, Fujiwara M, Shimazu T, Etoh T, Kodama M, So R et al (2022) Patients’ acceptability and implementation outcomes of a case management approach to encourage participation in colorectal cancer screening for people with schizophrenia: A qualitative secondary analysis of a mixed-method randomised clinical trial. BMJ Open 12:e060621. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060621

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Bartholomew Eldredge LK, Markham CM, Ruiter RAC, Fernández ME, Kok G, Parcel GS (2016) Planning health promotion programs : An intervention mapping approach. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA

    Google Scholar 

  26. Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J (2007) Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): A 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care 19:349–357. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzm042

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Booth A, Hannes K, Harden A, Noyes J, Harris J, Tong A (2014) COREQ (Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative studies). In: Moher D, Altman DG, Schulz KF, Simera I, Wager E (eds) Guidelines for reporting health research: a user’s manual. Wiley, West Sussex, UK, pp 214–226

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  28. McLeroy KR, Bibeau D, Steckler A, Glanz K (1988) An ecological perspective on health promotion programs. Health Educ Q 15:351–377. https://doi.org/10.1177/109019818801500401

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Weinstein LC, Stefancic A, Cunningham AT, Hurley KE, Cabassa LJ, Wender RC (2016) Cancer screening, prevention, and treatment in people with mental illness. CA Cancer J Clin 66:134–151. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21334

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. U.S Preventive Services Task Force (2016) Colorectal Cancer: Screening. https://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/recommendation/colorectal-cancer-screening-june-2016

  31. U.S Preventive Services Task Force (2012) Cervical Cancer: Screening. https://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/recommendation/cervical-cancer-screening-2012

  32. Patton MQ (2002) Qualitative research and evaluation methods Sage Publications, London

  33. Hsieh HF, Shannon SE (2005) Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res 15:1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Lukersmith S, Millington M, Salvador-Carulla L (2016) What is case management? A scoping and mapping review. Int J Integr Care 16:2. https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.2477

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Wells KJ, Valverde P, Ustjanauskas AE, Calhoun EA, Risendal BC (2018) What are patient navigators doing, for whom, and where? A national survey evaluating the types of services provided by patient navigators. Patient Educ Couns 101:285–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2017.08.017

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Peterson EB, Chou WS, Falisi A, Ferrer R, Mollica MA (2018) The role of medical social workers in cancer clinical trial teams: A group case study of multidisciplinary perspectives. Soc Work Health Care 57:688–704. https://doi.org/10.1080/00981389.2018.1477899

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Gerrity M (2014) Integrating primary care into behavioral health settings: What works for individuals with serious mental illness. https://www.milbank.org/publications/integrating-primary-care-into-behavioral-health-settings-what-works-for-individuals-with-serious-mental-illness/. Accessed 3 Mar 2022

  38. Bachrach D, Anthony S, Detty A (2014) State strategies for integrating physical and behavioral health services in a changing Medicaid environment. https://www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/fund-reports/2014/aug/state-strategies-integrating-physical-and-behavioral-health. Accessed 21 Mar 2022

  39. Docherty M, Spaeth-Rublee B, Scharf D, Ferenchick EK, Humensky J, Goldman ML, et al. (2020) How practices can advance the implementation of integrated care in the COVID-19 era. https://www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/issue-briefs/2020/nov/practices-advance-implementation-integrated-care-covid. Accessed 26 Jun 2022

  40. D’Alton P, O’Meara R, Langford S, McDonnell Z, Nuzum A, Murthy VE et al (2021) Barriers to cancer care for people with significant mental health difficulties: What healthcare staff say? Psychooncology 30:2032–2038. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.5790

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (2014) SAMHSA’s concept of trauma and guidance for a trauma-informed approach. https://store.samhsa.gov/product/SAMHSA-s-Concept-of-Trauma-and-Guidance-for-a-Trauma-Informed-Approach/SMA14-4884. Accessed 5 Aug 2022

  42. Davidson CA, Kennedy K, Jackson KT (2022) Trauma-informed approaches in the context of cancer care in Canada and the United States: a scoping review. Trauma Violence Abuse. https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380221120836

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Batra S, Baker RA, Wang T, Forma F, DiBiasi F, Peters-Strickland T (2017) Digital health technology for use in patients with serious mental illness: a systematic review of the literature. Med Devices (Auckl) 10:237–251. https://doi.org/10.2147/mder.S144158

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Brunette MF, Achtyes E, Pratt S, Stilwell K, Opperman M, Guarino S et al (2019) Use of smartphones, computers and social media among people with SMI: Opportunity for intervention. Community Ment Health J 55:973–978. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-019-00431-7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. California Health Care Foundation (2023) Summary of Medicaid state plan amendments for community health workers. https://www.chcf.org/publication/summary-medicaid-state-plan-amendments-chws/. Accessed May 17 2023

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the patients and their care team who took the time to speak with us.

Funding

Mr. Cristian Garcia-Alcaraz’s and Ms. Rosa A. Cobian Aguilar’s efforts were supported by the UC San Diego Strategic Enhancement of Excellence through Diversity (SEED) Fellowship and the San Diego State University (SDSU) University Graduate Fellowship. Ms. Aleigha Binda’s efforts were supported by the National Cancer Institute’s Multidisciplinary Educational Approach to Reducing Cancer Disparities Program (YES) Grant R25CA2217779 and National Cancer Institute Creating Scientists Program (CSP) Grant R25CA132699. Mr. Nicholas C. Lucido’s efforts were supported by the National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health under award numbers U54CA12384 and U54CA132379. Dr. Kristen Wells’ efforts were supported by the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities of the National Institutes of Health under award number U54MD012397. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of any funding organization.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

CGA: Validation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Data Curation, Writing––Original Draft, Writing––Review & Editing, Visualization; AB: Formal analysis, Investigation, Data Curation, Writing––Original Draft, Writing––Review & Editing, Visualization; JRG: Conceptualization, Methodology, Validation, Investigation, Writing––Review & Editing; ENA: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing––Review & Editing; KLG: Conceptualization, Methodology, Resources, Writing––Review & Editing, Project administration; RACA: Validation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Data Curation, Writing––Review & Editing; NCL: Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing––Review & Editing; DK: Formal analysis, Writing––Review & Editing; CA: Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation, Writing––Review & Editing; MGP: Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation, Project administration, Writing––Review & Editing; KJW: Conceptualization, Methodology, Resources, Writing––Original Draft, Writing––Review & Editing, Visualization, Supervision, Project administration, Funding acquisition.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kristen J. Wells.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Ethical approval

The study procedures were approved by a non-profit psychiatric hospital’s Institutional Review Board.

Consent to participate

Written informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Consent to publish

The authors affirm that participants provided informed consent for publication of their de-identified data.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 484 kb)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Garcia-Alcaraz, C., Binda, A., Gordon, J.R. et al. Intervention recommendations to improve uptake of breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening among individuals living with serious mental illness. Cancer Causes Control 35, 451–463 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-023-01791-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-023-01791-y

Keywords

Navigation