Skip to main content

Fish intake and risk of melanoma in the NIH-AARP diet and health study

Abstract

Purpose

Prior epidemiological studies evaluating the association between fish intake and melanoma risk have been few and inconsistent. Few studies distinguished different types of fish intake with risk of melanoma.

Methods

We examined the associations between intake of total fish and specific types of fish and risk of melanoma among 491,367 participants in the NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study. We used multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results

During 6,611,941 person-years of follow-up with a median of 15.5 years, 5,034 cases of malignant melanoma and 3,284 cases of melanoma in situ were identified. There was a positive association between higher total fish intake and risk of malignant melanoma (HR = 1.22, 95% CI = 1.11–1.34 for top vs. bottom quintiles, ptrend = 0.001) and melanoma in situ (HR = 1.28, CI = 1.13–1.44 for top vs. bottom quintiles, ptrend = 0.002). The positive associations were consistent across several demographic and lifestyle factors. There were also positive associations between tuna intake and non-fried fish intake, and risk of malignant melanoma and melanoma in situ. However, fried fish intake was inversely associated with risk of malignant melanoma, but not melanoma in situ.

Conclusions

We found that higher total fish intake, tuna intake, and non-fried fish intake were positively associated with risk of both malignant melanoma and melanoma in situ. Future studies are needed to investigate the potential biological mechanisms underlying these associations.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Data availability

The supporting data is available upon request.

References

  1. American Cancer Society (2020) Cancer facts & figures 2020. American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA

    Google Scholar 

  2. Begg CB, Hummer A, Mujumdar U, Armstrong BK, Kricker A, Marrett LD et al (2014) Familial aggregation of melanoma risks in a large population-based sample of melanoma cases. Cancer Causes Control 15:957–965

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gordon R (2013) Skin cancer: an overview of epidemiology and risk factors. Semin Oncol Nurs 29:160–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Maden V, Leah JT, Szeimies RM (2010) Non-melanoma skin cancer. Lancet 375:673–685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Whiteman DC, Stickley M, Watt P, Hughes MC, Davis MB, Green AC (2006) Anatomic site, sun exposure, and risk of cutaneous melanoma. J Clin Oncol 24:3172–3177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Yang K, Fung TT, Nan H (2018) An epidemiological review of diet and cutaneous malignant melanoma. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 27:1115–1122

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Loftfield E, Freedman ND, Graubard BI, Hollenbeck AR, Shebl FM, Mayne ST, Sinha R (2015) Coffee drinking and cutaneous melanoma risk in the NIH-AARP diet and health study. J Natl Cancer Inst. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/dju421

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Fortes C, Mastroeni S, Boffetta P, Antonelli G, Pilla MA, Botta G et al (2013) The protective effect of coffee consumption on cutaneous melanoma risk and the role of GSTM1 and GSTT1 polymorphisms. Cancer Causes Control 24:1779–1787

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wu S, Han J, Feskanich D, Cho E, Stampfer MJ, Willett WC et al (2015) Citrus consumption and risk of cutaneous malignant melanoma. J Clin Oncol 33:2500–2508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kubo JT, Henderson MT, Desai M, Wactawski-Wende J, Stefanick ML, Tang JY (2014) Alcohol consumption and risk of melanoma and non-melanoma skin cancer in the women’s health initiative. Cancer Causes Control 25:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Rivera A, Nan H, Li T, Qureshi A, Cho E (2016) Alcohol intake and risk of incident melanoma: a pooled analysis of three prospective studies in the United States. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 25:1550–1558

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Daniel CR, Cross AJ, Graubard BI, Hollenbeck AR, Park Y, Sinha R (2011) Prospective investigation of poultry and fish intake in relation to cancer risk. Cancer Prev Res 4:1903–1911

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Fortes C, Mastroeni S, Melchi F, Pilla MA, Antonelli G, Camaioni D, Alotto M, Pasquini P (2018) A protective effect of the mediterranean diet for cutaneous melanoma. Int J Epidemiol 37:1018–1029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Millen AE, Tucker MA, Hartge P, Halpern A, Elder DE, Guerry D, Holly EA, Sagebiel RW, Potischman N (2004) Diet and melanoma in a case-control study. Cancer Epidemiol Prev Biomark 13:1042–1051

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Naldi L, Gallus S, Tavani A, Imberti GL, La Vecchia C (2004) Oncology study group of the italian group for epidemiologic research in dermatology (GISED. Risk of melanoma and vitamin A, coffee and alcohol: a case–control study from Italy. Eur J Cancer Prev 13:503–508

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Le Marchand L, Saltzman BS, Hankin JH, Wilkens LR, Franke AA, Morris SJ, Kolonel LN (2006) Sun exposure, diet, and melanoma in Hawaii Caucasians. Am J Epidemiol 164:232–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Schatzkin A, Subar AF, Thompson FE et al (2011) Design and serendipity in establishing a large cohort with wide dietary intake distributions: the national institutes of health-American association of retired persons diet and health study. Am J Epidemiol 154:1119–1125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Thompson FE, Kipnis V, Midthune D, Freedman LS, Carroll RJ, Subar AF et al (2008) Performance of a food-frequency questionnaire in the US NIH- AARP (National institutes of health-American association of retired persons) diet and health study. Public Health Nutr 11:183–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Subar AF, Midthune D, Kulldorff M, Brown CC, Thompson FE, Kipnis V, Schatzkin A (2000) Evaluation of alternative approaches to assign nutrient values to food groups in food frequency questionnaires. Am J Epidemiol 152:279–286

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lin SW, Wheeler DC, Park Y, Cahoon EK, Hollenbeck AR, Freedman DM et al (2012) Prospective study of ultra- violet radiation exposure and risk of cancer in the United States. Int J Cancer 131:1015–1023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Groth IE (2010) Ranking the contributions of commercial fish and shellfish varieties to mercury exposure in the United States: implications for risk communication. Environ Res 110:226–236

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Mozaffarian D, Rimm EB (2006) Fish intake, contaminants, and human health: evaluating the risks and the benefits. JAMA 296:1885–1899

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. deCastro BR, Caldwell KL, Jones RL, Blount BC, Pan Y, Ward C et al (2014) Dietary sources of methylated arsenic species in urine of the United States population, NHANES 2003–2010. PLoS ONE 9:e108098

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Falk C, Hanrahan L, Anderson HA, Kanarek MS, Draheim L, Needham L et al (1999) Body burden levels of dioxin, furans, and PCBs among frequent consumers of Great Lakes sport fish. The Great Lakes Consort Environ Res 80:S19–S25

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Díez S, Montuori P, Pagano A, Sarnacchiaro P, Bayona JM, Triassi M (2008) Hair mercury levels in an urban population from southern Italy: fish consumption as a determinant of exposure. Environ Int 34:162–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Halldorsson TI, Thorsdottir I, Meltzer HM, Nielsen F, Olsen SF (2008) Linking exposure to polychlorinated biphenyls with fatty fish consumption and reduced fetal growth among Danish pregnant women: a cause for concern? Am J Epidemiol 168:958–965

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Turyk M, Anderson HA, Hanrahan LP, Falk C, Steenport DN, Needham LL, Patterson DG et al (2006) Relationship of serum levels of individual PCB, dioxin, and furan congeners and DDE with Great Lakes sport-caught fish consumption. Environ Res 100:173–183

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Gallagher RP, Macarthur AC, Lee TK, Weber JP, Leblanc A, Mark EJ et al (2011) Plasma levels of polychlorinated biphenyls and risk of cutaneous malignant melanoma: a preliminary study. Int J Cancer 128:1872–1880

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Donat-Vargas C, Berglund M, Glynn A, Wolk A, Åkesson A (2017) Dietary polychlorinated biphenyls, long-chain n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids and incidence of malignant melanoma. Eur J Cancer 72:137–143

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Matthews NH, Fitch K, Li WQ, Morris JS, Christiani DC, Qureshi AA et al (2019) Exposure to trace elements and risk of skin cancer: a systematic review of epidemiologic studies. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 28:3–21

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Schipani G, Del Duca E, Todaro G, Scali E, Dastoli S, Bennardo L et al (2020) Arsenic and chromium levels in hair correlate with actinic keratosis/non melanoma skin cancer: results of an observational controlled study. G Ital Dermatol Venereol. https://doi.org/10.23736/S0392-0488.20.06600-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Kim TH, Seo JW, Hong YS, Song KH (2017) Case-control study of chronic low-level exposure of inorganic arsenic species and non-melanoma skin cancer. J Dermatol 44:1374–1379

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Gonzalez H, Lema C, Kirken RA, Maldonado RA, Varela-Ramirez A, Aguilera RJ (2015) Arsenic-exposed keratinocytes exhibit differential microRNAs expression profile; potential implication of miR-21, miR-200a and miR-141 in melanoma pathway. Clin Cancer Drugs 2:138–147

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Magnani C, Coggon D, Osmond C, Acheson E (1987) Occupation and five cancers: a case-control study using death certificates. Br J Ind Med 44:769–776

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Boyd AS, Seger D, Vannucci S, Langley M, Abraham JL, King LE Jr (2000) Mercury exposure and cutaneous disease. J Am Acad Dermatol 43:81–90

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Pérez-Gómez B, Aragonés N, Gustavsson P, Plato N, López-Abente G, Pollán M (2005) Cutaneous melanoma in Swedish women: occupational risks by anatomic site. Am J Ind Med 48:270–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Rhee J, Vance TM, Lim R, Christiani DC, Qureshi AA, Cho E (2020) Association of blood mercury levels with nonmelanoma skin cancer in the U.S.A using national health and nutrition examination survey data (2003–2016). Br J Dermatol 183:480–487

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Matthews NH, Koh M, Li WQ, Li T, Willett WC, Stampfer MJ et al (2019) A prospective study of toenail trace element levels and risk of skin cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 28:1534–1543

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Freedman LS, Carroll RJ, Wax Y (1991) Estimating the relation between dietary intake obtained from a food frequency questionnaire and true average intake. Am J Epidemiol 134:510–520

    Google Scholar 

  40. Freudenheim JL, Marshall JR (1988) The problem of profound mismeasurement and the power of epidemiologic studies of diet and cancer. Nutr Cancer 11:243–250

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Shamshak GL, Anderson JL, Asche F, Garlock T, Love DC (2019) US seafood consumption. J World Aquac Soc 50:715–727

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported in part by the Intramural Research Program of the US National Institutes of Health (NIH), National Cancer Institute. Cancer incidence data from the Atlanta metropolitan area were collected by the Georgia Center for Cancer Statistics, Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia. Cancer incidence data from California were collected by the California Cancer Registry, California Department of Public Health’s Cancer Surveillance and Research Branch, Sacramento, California. Cancer incidence data from the Detroit metropolitan area were collected by the Michigan Cancer Surveillance Program, Community Health Administration, Lansing, Michigan. The Florida cancer incidence data used in this report were collected by the Florida Cancer Data System (FCDC; Miami, Florida) under contract with the Florida Department of Health (FDOH), Tallahassee, Florida. The views expressed herein are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the FCDC or FDOH. Cancer incidence data from Louisiana were collected by the Louisiana Tumor Registry, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center School of Public Health, New Orleans, Louisiana. Cancer incidence data from New Jersey were collected by the New Jersey State Cancer Registry, Cancer Epidemiology Services, New Jersey State Department of Health, Trenton, New Jersey. Cancer incidence data from North Carolina were collected by the North Carolina Central Cancer Registry, Raleigh, North Carolina. Cancer incidence data from Pennsylvania were supplied by the Division of Health Statistics and Research, Pennsylvania Department of Health, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania. The Pennsylvania Department of Health specifically disclaims responsibility for any analyses, interpretations, or conclusions. Cancer incidence data from Arizona were collected by the Arizona Cancer Registry, Division of Public Health Services, Arizona Department of Health Services, Phoenix, Arizona. Cancer incidence data from Texas were collected by the Texas Cancer Registry, Cancer Epidemiology and Surveillance Branch, Texas Department of State Health Services, Austin, Texas. Cancer incidence data from Nevada were collected by the Nevada Central Cancer Registry, State Health Division, State of Nevada Department of Health and Human Services, Las Vegas, Nevada. We are indebted to the participants in the NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study for their outstanding cooperation. We also thank Sigurd Hermansen and Kerry Grace Morrissey from Westat for study outcomes ascertainment and management and Leslie Carroll at Information Management Services for data support and analysis.

Funding

The authors have not disclosed any funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eunyoung Cho.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have not disclosed any competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 57 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, Y., Liao, L.M., Sinha, R. et al. Fish intake and risk of melanoma in the NIH-AARP diet and health study. Cancer Causes Control 33, 921–928 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-022-01588-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-022-01588-5

Keywords

  • Melanoma
  • Fish intake
  • AARP
  • Survival analyses